Lexical availability studies provide valuable insights into learners’ breadth and depth of controlled productive vocabulary, and structure of their lexicon. Yet, little is known about the performance of different-L1 learners on different prompts. Likewise, this study compared the available lexicon of three different-L1 groups of learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) (L1-Persian, L1-Arabic, and L1-Turkish) to explore whether first language (L1) background and type of prompt (concrete vs. abstract) yield quantitative and qualitative differences in retrieving available lexicon. An online New Vocabulary Levels Test and a lexical availability task were administered to 116 tertiary different-L1 EFL learners. Studying concrete and abstract prompts would uncover the intricate cognitive processes in word processing and retrieval, and semantic organization. The findings revealed that both L1 background and type of prompt impacted their lexical availability output, resulting in differences between the groups in the words generated for different prompts on the task. L1-Persian learners outperformed L1-Arabic and L1-Turkish learners in terms of number and quality of the words for the task. Moreover, the type of prompt meaningfully interacted with L1 background in eliciting words on the task; the three groups differed in word retrieval on both prompts but generated more words on concrete, than abstract, prompts. Thus, EFL teachers and materials developers can improve vocabulary instruction via considering L1 background in selecting or designing teaching materials or syllabi. Additionally, more tasks with abstract words would increase exposure to such words, and thus their ease in retrieval.
Agustín LlachM.P. (2016). Does L1 make a difference? Evidence from the receptive vocabulary size of Spanish and German EFL primary school learners. The Language Learning Journal, 44, 214–235.
2.
Agustín LlachM.P. (2019). CLI in lexical accessibility. In Martínez-AdriánM.Gallardo-del-PuertoF. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence: From empirical evidence to classroom practice (pp. 49–63). Springer.
3.
Agustín LlachM.P.FontechaA.F. (2014). Lexical variation in learners’ responses to cue words: The effect of gender. In Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 69–81). Springer.
AkbarianI.FarrokhiJ. (2021). Lexical availability and writing ability of EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31, 48–64.
6.
AliakbariM. (2005). The place of culture in the Iranian ELT textbooks in high school level. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied linguistics, 9, 163–179.
7.
AlonsoA.C. (2017). Spanish L1 speakers’ and EFL learners’ available lexicon. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 40, 5–23.
8.
Álvarez GilF.J.Melián MejíasJ. (2019). A contrastive analysis of lexical availability in Spanish and English as a second language at tertiary level. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6, 51–58. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/60099 (accessed May 2024).
9.
ChiswickB.R.MillerP.W. (2005). Linguistic distance: A quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26, 1–11.
10.
CoxJ.G.LynchJ.M.MendesN.ZhaiC. (2019). On bilingual aptitude for learning new languages: The roles of linguistic and nonlinguistic individual differences. Language Learning, 69, 478–514.
11.
CoxheadA. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.
12.
DimitrijevicN. (1969). Lexical availability: A new aspect of the lexical availability of secondary school children. Julius Gross.
13.
DimitrijevićN. (1981). A comparative study of the lexical availability of monolingual and bilingual schoolchildren. Studia Anglicata Ponsaniensia, 13, 109–130.
14.
Fernández OrioS.Jiménez CatalánR.M. (2015). Lexical availability of EFL learners at the end of Spanish secondary education: The effect of language program and prompt. ES: Revista de Filología Inglesa, 36, 103–127. Available at: http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/22681 (accessed May 2024).
15.
Ferreira CamposR.A.Echeverría WeassonM.S. (2014). Lexical availability of basic and advanced semantic categories in English L1 and English L2. In Jiménez CatalanR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 15–35). Springer.
16.
Gallardo-del-PuertoF.Martínez-AdriánM. (2014). The incidence of previous foreign language contact in a lexical availability task: A study of senior learners. In Jiménez CatalanR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 53–68). Springer.
17.
Gutierrez-MangadoM.J.Martínez-AdriánM.Gallardo-del-PuertoF. (Eds.). (2019). Cross-linguistic influence: From empirical evidence to classroom practice. Springer.
18.
Hernández-MuñozN.IzuraC.EllisA.W. (2006). Cognitive aspects of lexical availability. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 730–755.
19.
Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.). (2014). Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language. Springer.
20.
Jiménez CatalánR.M.Agustín LlachM.P.FernándezA.CangaA. (2014). The effect of age on EFL learners’ lexical availability: Word responses to the cue words ‘town’ and ‘countryside’. In Jiménez CatalanR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 37–68). Springer.
21.
Jiménez CatalánR.M.DewaeleJ.M. (2017). Lexical availability of young Spanish EFL learners: Emotion words vs. non-emotion words. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 30, 283–299.
22.
Jiménez CatalánR.M.FitzpatrickT. (2014). Frequency profiles of EFL learners’ lexical availability. In Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 83–100). Springer.
23.
Jiménez CatalánR.M.Ojeda AlbaJ. (2009). Girls’ and boys’ lexical availability in EFL. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 158, 57–76.
24.
KoizumiR. (2012). Relationships between text length and lexical diversity measures: Can we use short texts of less than 100 tokens. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 1, 60–69.
25.
LauferB. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.
26.
López GonzálezA.M. (2014). The effect of instruction on Polish Spanish learners’ lexical availability. In Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 139–169). Springer.
27.
López MoralesH. (2014). Lexical availability studies. In Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 1–11). Springer.
28.
López RiveroE. (2008). Estudio de disponibilidad léxica en 43 estudiantes de ELE [Study of lexical availability in 43 students of Spanish as a foreign language]. Master’s dissertation in teaching Spanish as a foreign language. Antonio de Nebrija University, Madrid, Spain.
29.
Martínez-AdriánM.Gallardo-del-PuertoF. (2017). The effect of language typology on L2 lexical availability and spelling accuracy. International Journal of English Studies, 17, 63–79.
30.
Martínez-AdriánM.Gallardo-del-PuertoF. (Eds.). (2019). Cross-linguistic influence: From empirical evidence to classroom practice. Springer.
31.
McLeanS.KramerB. (2015). The creation of a new vocabulary levels test. Shiken, 19, 1–11.
32.
MoraJ.Jiménez CatalánR.M. (2019). Prototypical associations in the production and lexical availability of Spanish and Slovene adolescents in Spanish and in English as foreign languages. Verba Hispanica, 27, 73–91.
33.
NationP. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Heinle and Heinle.
34.
NationP.WaringR. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In SchmittN.McCarthyM. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge University Press.
35.
RichardsJ.C.SchmidtR.W. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge.
36.
Samper HernándezM. (2002). Disponibilidad léxica en alumnos de español como lengua extranjera, Colección Monografías [Lexical availability in students of Spanish as a foreign language, Monograph Collection]. Volume 4. ASELE.
37.
Samper HernándezM. (2014). The relationship of language proficiency to the lexical availability of learners of Spanish. In Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 103–124). Springer.
38.
SanduB. (2013). Romanian students’ lexical availability in Spanish as a foreign language. Estudios Interlingüísticos, 1, 121–133.
39.
SchmittN. (2010). Researching vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
40.
SchmittN.McCarthyM. (Eds.). (2002). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
41.
Šifrar KalanM. (2009). Disponibilidad léxica en español como lengua extranjera: El cotejo de las investigaciones en Eslovenia, Salamanca y Finlandia [Lexical availability in Spanish as a foreign language: Comparison of research in Slovenia, Salamanca and Finland]. Verba Hispánica, 17, 165–182.
42.
Šifrar KalanM. (2014). Slovene students’ lexical availability in English and Spanish. In Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 125–138). Springer.
