This study investigated which type of instructional modality is most conducive to vocabulary learning. A total of 6 classrooms (N = 121), all from one 6th grade cohort, were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) vocabulary training anchored in listening, (2) vocabulary training anchored in reading, or (3) vocabulary training anchored in writing. Three parallel versions of the tasks involved 21 target words embedded in contexts, but the students encountered these words explicitly through either listening or reading or writing modality. The study found, first, that there were statistically significant differences in favor of the reading and writing groups in terms of word association ability and vocabulary knowledge. Students in the reading and writing groups showed roughly the same level of vocabulary knowledge. Second, the study found that the results varied depending on the experience level of the teacher, which has implications for understanding how to improve vocabulary learning.
AldersonJ.C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. Continuum.
2.
BarcroftJ. (2007). Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57, 35–56.
3.
BasturkmenH. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40, 282–95.
4.
BatemanB. (2008). Student teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about using the target language in the classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 11–28.
5.
BergmannJ.WimmerH. (2008). A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: Evidence from phonological and orthographic lexical decisions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 653–676.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
CraikF. I.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268.
8.
CraikF.I.M.LockhartR.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
9.
CurranP.WestS.FinchJ. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonmorality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
10.
DobinsonT. (2001). Do learners learn from classroom interaction and does the teacher have a role to play?Language Teaching Research, 4, 189–211.
11.
ElgortI.WarrenP. (2014). L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, 64, 365–414.
12.
EllisN. C. (2019). Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 39–60.
13.
FolseK. (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 273–293.
14.
FolseK. (2010). Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher’s job?Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 139–160.
15.
GassS.M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Erlbaum.
16.
GraesserA. C.McNamaraD. S.LouwerseM. M.CaiZ. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193–202.
17.
Gurzynski-WeissL. (2017). L2 instructor individual characteristics. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 451–467). Routledge.
18.
HorstM.CobbT.MearaP. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.
19.
HorwitzE.K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294.
20.
HuM.NationI.S.P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403–430.
21.
HulstijnJ.H.LauferB. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.
22.
JeonI.J. (2010). Exploring the co-teaching practice of native and non-native English teacher in Korea. English Teaching, 65, 43–67.
23.
JeonJ.PaekJ. (2009). A study on policy assessment for English education. English Teaching, 64, 47–75.
24.
JinZ.WebbS. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning though listening to teacher talkModern Language Journal, 104, 550–566.
25.
KeatingG.D. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12, 365–386.
26.
KlineR.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
KrashenS. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464.
28.
LauferB. (2005a). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. In Foster-CohenS.H.Garcia MayoM.P.CenozJ. (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook5 (pp. 223–250). John Benjamins.
29.
LauferB. (2005b). Instructed second language vocabulary learning: The fault in the ‘default hypothesis’. In HousenA.PierrardM. (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 286–303). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30.
LauferB.HulstijnJ. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
31.
LiuS.ReynoldsB.L. (2022). Empirical support for the Involvement Load Hypothesis (ILH): A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 12, 354.
32.
LuM. (2013). Effects of four vocabulary exercises on facilitating learning vocabulary meaning, form, and use. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 167–176.
33.
MacGinitieW.H.MacGinitieR.K.MariaK.DreyerL.G. (2010). Gates–MacGinitie reading test (4th ed.). Riverside.
34.
MackeyA.PolioC.McDonoughK. (2004). The relationship between experience, education, and teachers’ use of incidental focus-on-form techniques. Language Teaching Research, 8, 301–327.
35.
MessickS. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11.
36.
MinH. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58(1), 73–115.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Institute of Health Pub. No. 00–4769). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
39.
NiuR.Helms-ParkR. (2014). Interaction, modality, and word engagement as factors in lexical learning in a Chinese context. Language Teaching Research, 18, 345–372.
40.
NunanD. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589–613.
41.
OrtonJ. (2014). Comparing teachers’ judgments of learners’ speech in Chinese as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 507–526.
42.
ParibakhtT.S.WescheM. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 155–178.
43.
PaviaN.WebbS.FaezF. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning through listening to songs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 745–768.
44.
PeacockM. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29, 177–195.
45.
PetersE.HulstijnJ.SercuL.LutjeharmsM. (2009). Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning, 59, 113–151.
46.
PichetteF.De SerresL.LafontaineM. (2012). Sentence reading and writing for second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33, 66–82.
47.
PigadaM.SchmittN. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1–28.
48.
PorterA.C.RaudenbushS.W. (1987). Analysis of covariance: Its model and use in psychological research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 383–392.
49.
RassaeiE. (2017). Effects of three forms of reading-based output activity on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 76–95.
50.
ReadJ. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355–371.
51.
ReadJ. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
52.
ReadJ. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146–161.
53.
SchmidtR. (2001). Attention. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
54.
SchmittN. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.
55.
SchoonenR.VerhallenM. (2008). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. Language Testing, 25, 211–236.
56.
ShinH.SokS.DoJ. (2023). Role of individual differences in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through listening to stories: Metacognitive awareness and motivation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(4), 1669–1695.
57.
SokS.ShinH. W. (2022). Investigating the role of cognitive variables in second language learners’ listening comprehension: Aptitude and metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Listening, 36(2), 138–151.
58.
StanovichK. (1998). Refining the phonological core deficit model. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3, 17–21.
59.
StataCorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.
60.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.MaddenC. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
61.
SwainM. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In CookG.SeidlhoferB. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
62.
TengM.F.ZhangD. (2021). Task-induced involvement load, vocabulary learning in a foreign language, and their association with metacognition. Language Teaching Research, 28, 531–555.
63.
Van LierL. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2–6.
64.
Van LierL. (2011). Language learning: An ecological–semiotic approach. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of second language teaching and learning (2nd ed., pp. 383–394). Erlbaum.
65.
Van ZeelandH.SchmittN. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41, 609–624.
66.
VandergriftL.BakerS. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390–416.
67.
VidalK. (2003). Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition?Applied Linguistics, 24, 56–86.
68.
WaringR.TakakiM. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 130–163.
69.
WebbS. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33–52.
70.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 817–838.
71.
WolffC.E.van den BogertN.JarodzkaH.BoshuizenH.P. (2014). Keeping an eye on learning differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 68–85.
72.
WongW.PyunD. (2012). The effects of sentence writing on second language French and Korean lexical retention. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 64–189.
73.
WooldridgeJ. (2000). Introductory econometrics. South-Western College Publishing.
74.
YanagisawaA.WebbS. (2021). To what extent does the involvement load hypothesis predict incidental L2 vocabulary learning? A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 71, 487–536.
75.
ZaharR.CobbT.SpadaN. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 541–572.
76.
ZhangP.GrahamS. (2020a). Learning vocabulary through listening: The role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. Language Learning, 70, 1017–1053.
77.
ZhangP.GrahamS. (2020b). Vocabulary learning through listening: Comparing L2 explanations, teacher codeswitching, contrastive focus-on-form and incidental learning. Language Teaching Research, 24, 765–784.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
