Few studies have explored the influence of a speaker’s accent and visual (facial and gestural) cues on second-language (L2) listening comprehension. The current mixed-methods between-groups design investigated: (1) the effects of accent and visual cues on Arab students’ comprehension of recorded lectures delivered by two speakers: first language (L1) American English and second language (L2) English (strong Vietnamese accent), (2) students’ assessments of the comprehensibility and English nativelikeness of the accents, and (3) students’ perceptions of and preferences for visual cues in communication. A total of 120 Arab university students were distributed across three stimulus conditions: auditory-visual (AV)-gesture-face, AV-face, and A-only within two accent conditions (L1, L2 English). Materials included: a listening comprehension task, 9-point rating scales for comprehensibility and nativelikeness of accent, and a speaker’s accent and visual cues (SAVC) questionnaire. ANCOVAs were conducted on listening comprehension scores and the ratings, with students’ listening proficiency as the covariate. Students with higher listening proficiency received higher comprehension scores and tended to recognize the L1 English accent as nativelike; however, proficiency was not significantly related to their comprehensibility ratings of either accent. The L1 English speaker’s gestures were associated with higher comprehensibility ratings; the L2 English speaker’s gestures were associated with a stronger nonnativelike accent, which students found frustrating to comprehend. Although SAVC responses revealed a general preference for facial cues and gestures in daily communication, the L2 English speaker’s gestures in the study were not considered helpful. Thematic analysis of interviews emphasized: (1) the variable effectiveness of visual cues, (2) the important role of topic and accent familiarity, (3) the relationship between listening proficiency and interlocutor/instructor preference, and (4) strategies to deal with unfamiliar accents. Pedagogical implications include increased awareness of variability in visual cues across speakers and the need to build familiarity with various accents and gesture patterns.
AbdalhamidF. (2012). Listening comprehension strategies of Arabic-speaking ESL learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, Colorado State University. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10217/65198 (accessed April 2024).
2.
AbrahamssonN.HyltenstamK. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.
3.
AlibaliM.W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 307–331.
4.
AlibaliM.W.HeathD.C.MyersH.J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 169–188.
5.
AllenL.Q. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Applied Language Learning, 11, 155–176.
6.
AlsubhiM.S. (2017). How language and culture shape gesture in English, Arabic and second language speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England. Available at: https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8296/1/Alsubhi18PhD.pdf (accessed April 2024).
7.
BaileyK.M. (1982). Teaching in a second language: The communicative competence of non-native speaking teaching assistants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
8.
BallardL.WinkeP. (2017). Students’ attitudes towards English teachers’ accents: The interplay of accent familiarity, comprehensibility, intelligibility, perceived native speaker status, and acceptability as a teacher. In IsaacsT.TrofimovichP. (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment (pp. 121–140). Multilingual Matters.
9.
BergerK.W. (1972). Speechreading: Principles and methods. National Education Press.
10.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
11.
CobbT. (2008). Compleat lexical tutor. Available at: https://www.lextutor.ca (accessed April 2024).
12.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for language: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf (accessed April 2024).
13.
CreswellJ.W.CreswellJ.D. (2018) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
14.
DahlT.I.LudvigsenS. (2014). How I see what you’re saying: The role of gestures in native and foreign language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 98, 813–833.
15.
de BarrosP.C.M. (2010). ‘It’s easier to understand’: The effect of a speaker’s accent, visual cues, and background knowledge on listening comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kansas State University, Manhatten, KS, USA. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4492 (accessed April 2024).
16.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.
17.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2018). Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker.’Applied Linguistics, 39, 236–240.
18.
DimitrovaD.ChuM.WangL.ÖzyürekA.HagoortP. (2016). Beat that word: How listeners integrate beat gesture and focus on multimodal speech discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 1255–1269.
19.
DrijversL.ÖzyürekA. (2019). Non-native listeners benefit less from gestures and visible speech than native listeners during degraded speech comprehension. Language and Speech, 63, 209–220.
20.
EberhardD.M.SimonsG.F.FennigC.D. (Eds.). (2022). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (25th ed.). SIL International. Available at: http://www.ethnologue.com (accessed April 2024).
FieldA. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
24.
GassS.VaronisM. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34, 65–89.
25.
GorsuchG.J. (2003). The educational cultures of international teaching assistants and U.S. universities. TESL-EJ, 7(3).
26.
GregersenT.Olivares-CuhatG.StormJ. (2009). An examination of L1 and L2 gesture use: What role does proficiency play?The Modern Language Journal, 93, 195–208.
27.
GullbergM. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden. Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/4825091/3912717.pdf (accessed April 2024).
28.
GullbergM. (2006). Some reasons for studying gestures and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 103–124.
29.
GullbergM. (2011). Multilingual multimodality: Communicative difficulties and their solutions in second language use. In StreeckJ.GoodwinC.LeBaronC. (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 137–151). Cambridge University Press.
30.
GullbergM.RobertsL.DimrothC.VeroudeK.IndefreyP. (2010). Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60, 5–24.
31.
HardisonD.M. (1996). Bimodal speech perception by native and nonnative speakers of English: Factors influencing the McGurk effect. Language Learning, 46, 3–73.
32.
HardisonD.M. (2003). Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 495–522.
33.
HardisonD.M. (2014). Phonological literacy in L2 learning and teacher training. In LevisJ.MoyerA. (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp. 195–218). de Gruyter.
34.
HardisonD.M. (2018). Visualizing the acoustic and gestural beats of emphasis in multimodal discourse: Theoretical and pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4, 231–258.
35.
HendriksB.van MeursF.UsmanyN. (2021). The effects of lecturers’ non-native accent strength in English on intelligibility and attitudinal evaluations by native and non-native English students. Language Teaching Research, 27, 1378–1407.
36.
HirataY.KellyS.D. (2010). Effects of lips and hands on auditory learning of second-language speech sounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 298–310.
37.
HirataY.KellyS.D.HuangJ.ManansalaM. (2014). Effects of hand gestures on auditory learning of second-language vowel length contrasts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2090–2101.
38.
Institute of International Education. (2021). International student enrollment trends, 1948/49–2020/21. Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. Institute of International Education. Available at: http://www.opendoorsdata.org (accessed April 2024).
39.
IrwingP.BoothT.HughesD. (Eds.). (2018). The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale, and test development. Wiley Blackwell.
40.
JenkinsS.ParraI. (2003). Multiple layers of meaning in an oral proficiency test: The complementary roles of nonverbal, paralinguistic, and verbal behaviors in assessment decisions. Modern Language Journal, 87, 90–107.
41.
JohnsonK.MullennixJ.W. (Eds.). (1997). Talker variability in speech processing. Academic Press.
42.
JulianF.D. (1987). An overview of nonverbal gender differences. Tennessee Communication Association Journal, 13, 5–8.
43.
KamiyaN. (2022). The limited effects of visual and audio modalities on second language listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221096213
44.
KangO.RubinD. (2014). Listener expectations, reverse linguistic stereotyping, and individual background factors in social judgments and oral performance assessment. In LevisJ. M.MoyerA. (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp. 239–253). de Gruyter.
45.
KellermanS. (1992). ‘I see what you mean’: The role of kinesic behaviour in listening and implications for foreign and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 13, 239–257.
46.
KendonA. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech: An analysis of an example. In SegmanA.PopeB. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). Pergamon.
47.
KendonA. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.
48.
KennedyS.TrofimovichP. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 459–489.
49.
KraussR. M.HadarU. (1999). The role of speech-related hand/arm gestures in word retrieval. In MessingL.CampbellR. (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 93–116). Oxford.
50.
LauK.-L. (2017). Strategy use, listening problems, and motivation of high- and low-proficiency Chinese listeners. The Journal of Educational Research, 110, 503–514.
51.
LazaratonA. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54, 79–117.
52.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
53.
MajorR.C.FitzmauriceS.M.BuntaF.BalasubramanianC. (2005). Testing the effects of regional, ethnic, and international dialects of English on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55, 37–69.
54.
McCaffertyS.G. (2002). Gesture and creating zones of proximal development for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 192–203.
55.
McCroskeyJ.C.RichmondV.P.SallinenA.FayerJ.M.BarracloughR.L. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281–291.
56.
McNeillD. (1992). Hand and mind. University of Chicago Press.
57.
McNeillD. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.
58.
McNeillD. (2006). Gesture and communication. In BrownK. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 58–66). Elsevier.
59.
MerkerB.H.MadisonG.S.EckerdalP. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment. Cortex, 45, 4–17.
60.
MoussuL. (2010). Influence of teacher-contact time and other variables on ESL students’ attitudes towards native- and nonnative-English-speaking teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 746–768.
61.
NakataniY. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 151–168.
62.
NguyenT.IngramJ.C.L. (2016). Vietnamese accented English: Foreign accent and intelligibility judgement by listeners of different language backgrounds. Journal of English as an International Language, 11, 19–38.
63.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
64.
PeelleJ.E.SommersM.S. (2015). Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception. Cortex, 68, 169–181.
65.
PenningtonM.C.ChunD.M.HardisonD.M. (2002). VISI-PRO video-based pronunciation training system. University of Luton, Revenue Investment Fund Project.
66.
PerryL.K.MechE.N.MacDonaldM.C.SeidenbergM.S. (2018). Influences of speech familiarity on immediate perception and final comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 431–439.
67.
PisoniD.B. (1997). Some thoughts on ‘normalization’ in speech perception. In JohnsonK.MullennixJ.W. (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 9–32). Academic Press.
68.
RodriguezM.C. (2005). Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24, 3–13.
69.
RohrerP.L.Delais-RoussarieE.PrietoP. (2020). Beat gestures for comprehension and recall: Differential effects of language learners and native listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575929.
70.
Schmidt-OorbeekC.D.C. (2017). Impact of accented speech on the credibility of international exchange courses; Challenges for exchanging knowledge and experience in the Erasmus+ program. In Proceedings of Third Conference on Coastal and Delta Areas: Problem, Solution and Development of Coastal and Delta Areas, Indonesia, pp. 113–118. Available at: https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ICCDA/article/view/1990 (accessed April 2024).
71.
StamG.TellierM. (2021). Gesture helps second and foreign language learning and teaching. In MorgensternA.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Gesture in language: Development across the lifespan (pp. 336–363). de Gruyter Mouton.
72.
SubtireluN.C. (2015). ‘She does have an accent but . . .’: Race and language ideology in students’ evaluations of mathematics instructors on RateMyProfessors.com. Language in Society, 44, 35–62.
73.
SueyoshiA.HardisonD.M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second-language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55, 661–699.
74.
TreffnerP.PeterM.KleidonM. (2008). Gestures and phases: The dynamics of speech–hand communication. Ecological Psychology, 20, 32–64.
75.
VandergriftL. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89.
76.
VandergriftL.TafaghodtariM.H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.
77.
ZhengY.SamuelA.G. (2019). How much do visual cues help listeners in perceiving accented speech?Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 93–109.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
