This study addresses a gap in research by investigating the role of the Blackboard platform in information communication technology based (ICT-based) language education, particularly among Chinese master’s students in the UK. Aiming to enhance the proficiency of Blackboard utilization, the research involved 54 postgraduate students, utilizing questionnaires and interviews to gather data. The findings reveal a positive impact on English language learning, emphasizing improvements in listening (β = 0.180), reading (β = 0.151) and interaction (β = 0.130). This research contributes to the understanding of the efficacy of Blackboard in foreign language education, offering insights for both educators and learners.
AbdulkadirM. G.MusaH.AbuI. O. (2023). Services and impact of ICT application on job performance in the dissemination of information in special library: A case study of Niger state judiciary library, Minna.
2.
AkindeleA.T.ArulogunO.T.TayeG.T., et al. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 and FAIR data innovation on distance education in Africa. Data Intelligence, 4, 1013–1032.
3.
AndreouG.VlachosF.AndreouE. (2005). Affecting factors in second language learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 429–438.
4.
AqshaM.PeiC. (2009). Language learning via ICT: Uses, challenges and issues. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 6, 1453–1467.
5.
Arango-CaroS.WalshL.L.WesterE.R.Callis-DuehlK. (2022). The role of educational technology on mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. In WitchelH.J.LeeM.W. (Eds.), Technologies in biomedical and life sciences education: Approaches and evidence of efficacy for learning (pp. 451–490). Springer.
6.
Arteaga SánchezR.Duarte HuerosA.García OrdazM. (2013). E-learning and the University of Huelva: A study of WebCT and the technological acceptance model. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30, 135–160.
7.
BangertA. W. (2006). The development of an instrument for assessing online teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(3), 227–244.
BolingE. C.HoughM.KrinskyH.SaleemH.StevensM. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126.
10.
BonkC. J. (2012). Technology enhanced teaching: From tinkering to tottering to totally extreme learning. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on open and distance learning, Manila, the Philippines (pp. 1–33).
11.
BradfordP.PorcielloM.BalkonN.BackusD. (2007). The Blackboard learning system: The be all and end all in educational instruction?Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35, 301–314.
12.
ChenV.SandfordA.LaGroneM.CharbonneauK.KongJ.RagavalooS. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 512–533.
13.
ChughR.TurnbullD.CowlingM.A.VanderburgR.VanderburgM.A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 16403–16429.
14.
DörnyeiZ.DewaeleJ.M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
15.
DörnyeiZ.TaguchiT. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
16.
ElleyW.B.MangubhaiF. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 53–67.
17.
FathmanA.K.KesslerC. (1992). Cooperative language learning in school contexts. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 127–140.
18.
GaffasZ.M. (2023). Students’ perceptions of e-learning ESP course in virtual and blended learning modes. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 10329–10358.
19.
GetieA.S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7, 1738184.
20.
GrayJ. A.DiLoretoM. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), n1.
21.
HeeksR. (2017). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge.
22.
KhamidovnaP.O. (2023). Features of the use of modern didactic tools in technical higher educational institutions. Telematique, 21, 7630–7634.
23.
KilagO.K.T.LechadoresV.M.B.TolinJ.E. (2023). Moving beyond the new normal: Understanding Flexible Learning Options (FLOs) on the parameters of Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP). Science and Education, 4, 866–873.
24.
LazaratonA. (1991). A Computer Supplement to Accompany: Hatch and Lazaraton-The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Newbury House Publishers.
25.
LeongL.M.AhmadiS.M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skill. International Journal Research in English Education, 2, 34–41.
26.
LiS.ZhangC.LiuQ.TongK. (2022). E-Learning during COVID-19: Perspectives and experiences of the faculty and students. BMC Medical Education, 22, 328.
27.
LiawS.S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51, 864–873.
28.
ManegreM.Gutiérrez-ColónM. (2023). Foreign language learning through collaborative writing in knowledge building forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 1364–1376.
29.
MarachiR.QuillL. (2020). The case of Canvas: Longitudinal datafication through learning management systems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25, 418–434.
30.
OliverR. (2002). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change agent for education. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228920282 (accessed February 2024).
31.
PerratonH. (2012). Open and distance learning in the developing world. Routledge.
32.
PratiwiD.I.WaluyoB. (2023). Autonomous learning and the use of digital technologies in online English classrooms in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15, ep423.
33.
PusuluriS.MahasnehA.AlsayerB.A.M. (2017). The application of blackboard in the English courses at Al Jouf University: Perceptions of students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7, 106.
34.
QaddumiH.SmithM.MasdK.BakeerA.Abu-UlbehW. (2023). Investigating Palestinian in-service teachers’ beliefs about the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) into teaching English. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12785–12805.
35.
QiuX.B.ShanC.YaoJ.FuQ.K. (2023). The effects of virtual reality on EFL learning: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11738-0
36.
RahimiM.FathiJ. (2022). Employing e-tandem language learning method to enhance speaking skills and willingness to communicate: The case of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–37.
37.
RobinsonO.C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, 25–41.
38.
Rosario-LebrónA. (2022). If these blackboards could talk 2: The Fem-Crit classroom. Family Court Review, 60, 793–817.
39.
ShahmirS.HamidiF.BagherzadehZ. (2011). Role of ICT in the curriculum educational system. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 623–626.
40.
ShamoailE. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions and experiences in adopting ‘Blackboard’ computer program in a Victorian secondary school: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
41.
ThabaneL.MaJ.ChuR., et al. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1–10.
42.
ZouB. (2013). Teachers’ support in using computers for developing students’ listening and speaking skills in pre-sessional English courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 83–99.
