Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023
Perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and willingness to communicate in the online class: The mediating role of learning enjoyment and group interaction for Chinese as a second language
Few previous studies have focused on the effect of online environment factors (teachers’ enthusiasm, group interaction, etc.) on learners’ willingness to communicate in the context of learning Chinese as a second language (CSL). To fill this gap, this study investigated 471 CSL learners (1) to explore the mediating role of online learning enjoyment and perceived group interaction on the perception of teachers’ enthusiasm and willingness to communicate in L2 in online CSL classes; and (2) to clarify whether gender, weekly self-online learning time and learning achievement moderate those relations. A moderated mediation structural equation model with good fitness revealed that both perceived group interaction and online learning enjoyment fully mediated the relationship between perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and willingness to communicate in L2, with perceived group interaction being a more vital mediator than learning enjoyment. The results illustrated that the structural mediating relationships significantly differ across genders, weekly self-learning times, and learners with different learning achievements. The findings advance the understanding of the pyramid model of willingness to communicate in online L2 learning and provide significant pedagogical implications.
AdamsG.A.WebsterJ.R. (2022). Relating supervisor interpersonal emotion management- and task-oriented leadership to adaptive performance: A moderated-mediation model incorporating trust and gender. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 41, 549–567.
2.
AhmadiH.S.AnsarifarA.AnsarifarM. (2015). Exploring the relationship between willingness to communicate in English, and social/cultural capital among Iranian undergraduate English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5, 413–420.
3.
Al MamunM.A.LawrieG.WrightT. (2022). Exploration of learner-content interactions and learning approaches: The role of guided inquiry in the self-directed online environments. Computers and Education, 178, 104398.
4.
Altunelİ. (2021). Insights into EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in online English classes during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study from Turkey. Language and Technology, 3, 13–20.
5.
AlqarniN. (2021). Language learners’ willingness to communicate and speaking anxiety in online versus face-to-face learning contexts. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20, 57–77.
6.
ArcherJ. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94, 1381–1415.
7.
AziziZ.Farid KhafagaA. (2023). Scaffolding via group-dynamic assessment to positively affect motivation, learning anxiety, and willingness to communicate: A case study of high school students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52, 831–851.
8.
BrawleyL.R.CarronA.V.WidmeyerW.N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9, 275–294.
9.
BrindleyJ.E.BlaschkeL.M.WaltiC. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3).
10.
BurićI.MoeA. (2020). What makes teachers enthusiastic: The interplay of positive affect, self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103008.
11.
CaiZ.FanX.DuJ. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 105, 1–13.
12.
CaoY. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468–479.
13.
CaoY.PhilpJ. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34, 480–493.
14.
CassarA.RigdonM. (2023). Sustaining the potential for cooperation as female competitive strategy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378, 20210440.
15.
ChenK. (2023). The relationship between learning styles and foreign language learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 801–806.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.
18.
Den BrokP.BrekelmansM.WubbelsT. (2006). Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 199–213.
19.
DerakhshanA.FathiJ. (2023). Grit and foreign language enjoyment as predictors of EFL learners’ online engagement: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00745-x
20.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2022). Enjoyment. In LiS.HiverP.PapiM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 190–206). Routledge.
21.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2023). The interplay between learner-internal variables and levels of anxiety and enjoyment among Spanish EFL learners. In KerstenK.WinslerA. (Eds.), Understanding variability in second language acquisition, bilingualism, and cognition (pp. 217–239). Routledge.
22.
DewaeleJ.-M.LiC. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25, 922–945.
23.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237–274.
24.
DewaeleJ.-M.SaitoK.HalimiF. (2023). How foreign language enjoyment acts as a buoy for sagging motivation: A longitudinal investigation. Applied Linguistics, 44, 22–45.
25.
DiciccioT.J.RomanoJ.P. (1988). A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 50, 338–354.
26.
EgbertJ. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 549–586.
27.
FallahN. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140–147.
28.
FatimahA.S.SantianaS.SaputraY. (2019). Digital comic: An innovation of using toondoo as media technology for teaching English short story. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7, 101–108.
29.
FreiermuthM.R.HuangH.C. (2018). Assessing willingness to communicate for academically, culturally, and linguistically different language learners: Can English become a virtual lingua franca via electronic text-based chat? In ZouB.ThomasM. (Eds.), Handbook of research on integrating technology into contemporary language learning and teaching (pp. 57–85). IGI Global.
30.
FreiermuthM.R.ItoM.F. (2020). Seeking the source: The effect of personality and previous experiences on university students’ L2 willingness to communicate. Learning and Motivation, 71, 101640.
31.
FreiermuthM.JarrellD. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help?International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 189–212.
32.
FujishinR. (2023). Creating effective groups: The art of small group communication. Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
GliemJ.A.GliemR.R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education (pp. 82–88). Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1805/344 (accessed November 2023).
34.
GokD.BozoglanH.BozoglanB. (2023). Effects of online flipped classroom on foreign language classroom anxiety and reading anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36, 840–860.
35.
GolonkaE.M.BowlesA.R.FrankV.M.RichardsonD.L.FreynikS. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70–105.
36.
HagenauerG.Gläser-ZikudaM.VoletS.E. (2016). University teachers’ perceptions of appropriate emotion display and high-quality teacher–student relationship: Similarities and differences across cultural-educational contexts. Frontline Learning Research, 4, 44–74.
37.
HartiganJ.A.WongM.A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28, 100–108.
38.
HeckelC.RingeisenT. (2017). Enjoyment and boredom in academic online-learning: Relations with appraisals and learning outcomes. In MooreK.A.BuchwaldP. (Eds.), Stress and anxiety: Coping and resilience (pp. 127–136). Logos Verlag Berlin.
39.
HrastinskiS. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information and Management, 45, 499–506.
40.
HsuL.L.-i. (2006). The relationship among teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy behaviors and students’ willingness to speak in English in central Taiwanese college classrooms. Oral Roberts University.
41.
JinS.LeeH. (2022). Willingness to communicate and its high-evidence factors: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41, 716–745.
42.
JongsmaM.V.ScholtenD.J.van Muijlwijk-KoezenJ.E.MeeterM. (2023). Online versus offline peer feedback in higher education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61, 329–354.
43.
KangS. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292.
44.
KellerM.M.HoyA.W.GoetzT.FrenzelA.C. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 743–769.
45.
KhajavyG.H.GhonsoolyB.Hosseini FatemiA.ChoiC.W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 154–180.
46.
KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.BarabadiE. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 605–624.
47.
KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.TaherianT.RossJ. (2021). Examining the dynamic relationships between willingness to communicate, anxiety and enjoyment using the experience sampling method. In ZarrinabadiN.PawlakM. (Eds.), New perspectives on willingness to communicate in a second language (pp. 169–197). Springer.
48.
KlineR.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edition.Guilford Publications.
49.
KohnkeL.MoorhouseB.L. (2022). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53, 296–301.
50.
KrukM. (2022). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in second life: The case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35, 190–216.
51.
KunnanA.J. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modelling for language assessment research. Language Testing, 15, 295–332.
52.
KunterM.TsaiY.-M.KlusmannU., et al. (2008). Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18, 468–482.
53.
LaiC.L.HwangG.J. (2014). Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem–solving, meta–cognitive awareness and creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8, 276–291.
54.
LazaridesR.GaspardH.DickeA.-L. (2019). Dynamics of classroom motivation: Teacher enthusiasm and the development of math interest and teacher support. Learning and Instruction, 60, 126–137.
55.
LeeJ.S. (2022). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43, 452–468.
56.
LeeJ.S.HsiehJ.C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73.
57.
LeeJ.S.LuY. (2023). L2 motivational self system and willingness to communicate in the classroom and extramural digital contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36, 126–148.
58.
LeeJ.S.XieQ.LeeK. (2021). Informal digital learning of English and L2 willingness to communicate: Roles of emotions, gender, and educational stage. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1918699
59.
LeeJ.S.YeungN.M.OsburnM.B. (2022). Foreign language enjoyment as a mediator between informal digital learning of English and willingness to communicate: A sample of Hong Kong EFL secondary students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2112587
60.
LiC.DewaeleJ.M.PawlakM.KrukM. (2022). Classroom environment and willingness to communicate in English: The mediating role of emotions experienced by university students in China. Language Teaching Research.
61.
LiC.JiangG.DewaeleJ.-M. (2018). Understanding Chinese high school students’ foreign language enjoyment: Validation of the Chinese version of the foreign language enjoyment scale. System, 76, 183–196.
62.
LiC.WeiL. (2023). Anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom in language learning amongst junior secondary students in rural China: How do they contribute to L2 achievement?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 93–108.
63.
LiR.MengZ.TianM.ZhangZ.XiaoW. (2021). Modelling Chinese EFL learners’ flow experiences in digital game-based vocabulary learning: The roles of learner and contextual factors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34, 483–505.
64.
LinC.H.ZhengB.ZhangY. (2017). Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 730–748.
65.
LuQ.MustafaZ. (2021). Toward the impact of EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and collective efficacy on students’ engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 744586.
66.
MacIntyreP. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 111–131.
67.
MacIntyreP.D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576.
68.
MacIntyreP.D.BakerS.C.ClémentR.DonovanL.A. (2003). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 53, 137–166.
69.
MacIntyreP.D.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
70.
MacIntyreP.D.WangL. (2021). Willingness to communicate in the L2 about meaningful photos: Application of the pyramid model of WTC. Language Teaching Research, 25, 878–898.
71.
MandouitL.HattieJ. (2023). Revisiting ‘the power of feedback’ from the perspective of the learner. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101718.
72.
McCroskeyJ.C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16–25.
73.
MerchantK. (2012). How men and women differ: Gender differences in communication styles, influence tactics, and leadership styles. CMC Senior Theses, Claremont McKenna College.
74.
MohammadiM.MahdivandZ. (2019). Is willingness to communicate a reliable predictor of learner autonomy in an EFL context?CEPS Journal, 9, 9–26.
75.
MoosD.C.RingdalA. (2012). Self-regulated learning in the classroom: A literature review on the teachers’ role. Education Research International, 2012, 423284.
76.
MorinA.J.MeyerJ.P.CreusierJ.BiétryF. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 231–254.
77.
NemetzP.L.EagerW.M.LimpaphayomW. (2017). Comparative effectiveness and student choice for online and face-to-face classwork. Journal of Education for Business, 92, 210–219.
78.
OzH. (2014). Big five personality traits and willingness to communicate among foreign language learners in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42, 1473–1482.
79.
PatrickB.C.HisleyJ.KemplerT. (2000). ‘What’s everybody so excited about?’: The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 217–236.
80.
PavelescuL.M. (2023). Emotion, motivation and willingness to communicate in the language learning experience: A comparative case study of two adult ESOL learners. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221146884
81.
PavelescuL.M.PetrićB. (2018). Love and enjoyment in context: Four case studies of adolescent EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 73–101.
82.
PekrunR.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2014). Introduction to emotions in education. In PekrunR.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 11–20). Routledge.
83.
PengJ.E.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.
84.
PengY.YanW.ChengL. (2021). Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK): A multi-level, multi-purpose proficiency test. Language Testing, 38, 326–337.
85.
PinielK.AlbertÁ. (2019). Motivation and flow. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 579–597). Palgrave Macmillan.
86.
QaziA.HasanN.Abayomi-AlliO., et al. (2022). Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4225–4258.
87.
RyanA.M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101–111.
88.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
89.
SafapourE.KermanshachiS.TanejaP. (2019). A review of nontraditional teaching methods: Flipped classroom, gamification, case study, self-learning, and social media. Education Sciences, 9, 273.
90.
ShaoK.StockingerK.MarshH.W.PekrunR. (2023). Applying control-value theory for examining multiple emotions in L2 classrooms: Validating the achievement emotions questionnaire – Second language learning. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221144497
91.
SheybaniM. (2019). The relationship between EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and their teacher immediacy attributes: A structural equation modelling. Cogent Psychology, 6, 1607051.
92.
SiddiqF.SchererR. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205–217.
93.
SongY. (2022). The constructive role of teacher enthusiasm and clarity in reducing Chinese EFL students’ boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874348.
94.
SpadaroG.JinS.BallietD. (2023). Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: A meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378, 20210438.
95.
StephanW.G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 239–255.
96.
SyedH.KuzborskaI. (2020). Dynamics of factors underlying willingness to communicate in a second language. The Language Learning Journal, 48, 481–500.
97.
TanakaM. (2023). Motivation, self-construal, and gender in project-based learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17, 306–320.
98.
VianelloM.SchnabelK.SriramN.NosekB. (2013). Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 994–999.
99.
WangC.TsengW.-T.ChenY.-L.ChengH.-F. (2020). Classroom interactions in the target language: Learners’ perceptions, willingness to communicate, and communication behavior. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 393–404.
100.
WangM.-T.EcclesJ.S.KennyS. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24, 770–775.
101.
WangY.CaoY.GongS.WangZ.LiN.AiL. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94, 102128.
102.
WangY.DerakhshanA.ZhangL.J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731721.
103.
WeiX.XuQ. (2022). Predictors of willingness to communicate in a second language (L2 WTC): Toward an integrated L2 WTC model from the socio-psychological perspective. Foreign Language Annals, 55, 258–282.
104.
WuS.-Y.WangS.-M. (2023). Exploring the effects of gender grouping and the cognitive processing patterns of a Facebook-based online collaborative learning activity. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 576–590.
105.
YashimaT.MacIntyreP.D.IkedaM. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22, 115–137.
106.
YashimaT.Zenuk-NishideL. (2008). The impact of learning contexts on proficiency, attitudes, and L2 communication: Creating an imagined international community. System, 36, 566–585.
107.
YufrizalH. (2023). An introduction to second language acquisition. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.
108.
ZadorozhnyyA.LeeJ.S. (2023). Informal digital learning of English and willingness to communicate in a second language: Self-efficacy beliefs as a mediator. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2215279
109.
ZakianM. (2021). The effects of recast on the speaking accuracy and willingness to communicate (WTC) of Iranian EFL learners across gender. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 9, 75–80.
110.
ZareM.ShooshtariZ.G.JalilifarA. (2022). The interplay of oral corrective feedback and L2 willingness to communicate across proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research, 26, 1158–1178.
111.
ZareiN.SaeidiM.AhangariS. (2019). Exploring EFL teachers’ socioaffective and pedagogic strategies and students’ willingness to communicate with a focus on Iranian culture. Education Research International, 2019, 1–11.
112.
ZhangJ.BeckmannN.BeckmannJ.F. (2018). To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom. System, 72, 226–239.
113.
ZhangZ.LiuT.LeeC. B. (2021). Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 98, 102478.
114.
ZhouL.XiY.LochtmanK. (2023). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: The moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44, 129–143.
115.
ZhaoX.SunP.P.GongM. (2023). The merit of grit and emotions in L2 Chinese online language achievement: a case of Arabian students. International Journal of Multilingualism. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2202403.
116.
ZohrabiM.FarshbafanL.B. (2022). Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions of strategies for promoting learners’ willingness-to-communicate in online classes. Applied Research on English Language, 11, 89–110.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
