The effects of task-induced involvement load and gloss languages on incidental L2 vocabulary learning

Abstract

The current study investigated the interaction between task-induced involvement load and the languages used in vocabulary glosses on incidental second language (L2) word learning in low proficiency learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). Using computer-based tasks, the study also probed whether a task with a higher level of involvement load promoted a greater learner engagement with unfamiliar words, as measured by their hypertext gloss lookup frequencies. A total of 160 Thai EFL learners were equally divided into five task conditions based on the relative level of involvement load (low, high) and type of target word gloss (no glosses, L1 glosses, L2 glosses). The findings suggest that a task with a higher level of involvement load and first language (L1) glosses is most conducive to L2 word learning and that gloss language can mediate the effect of involvement load. Moreover, a task with a higher level of involvement load prompted learners to be more engaged with unfamiliar L2 words, irrespective of gloss language. The study provides partial support for the Involvement Load Hypothesis and reveals the differential effects of L1 and L2 glosses on L2 learning, which were not taken into account in the hypothesis. Pedagogical implications are also discussed.

Keywords

EFL learners hypertext glosses incidental vocabulary learning involvement load hypothesis L1 glosses L2 glosses second language vocabulary acquisition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cheng

Y.H.

Good

R.L.

(2009). L1 glosses: Effects on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 119–142. Available at: https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/item/196 (accessed May 2023).

Choi

(2016). Effects of L1 and L2 glosses on incidental vocabulary acquisition and lexical representations. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 137–143.

Coxhead

(2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.

De Ridder

. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning text comprehension and the reading process? Language Learning and Technology, 6, 123–146.

Eckerth

Tavakoli

(2012). The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research, 16, 227–252.

Gass

S.M.

(1999) Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 319–333.

Golonka

E.M.

Bowles

A.R.

Frank

V.M.

Richardson

D.L.

Freynik

(2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70–105.

Hazrat

Read

(2022). Enhancing the involvement load hypothesis as a tool for classroom vocabulary research. TESOL Quarterly, 56, 387–400.

Godfroid

(2019). Choosing words to teach: A novel method for vocabulary selection and its practical application. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 348–371.

10.

Hulstijn

J.H.

(2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In Robinson

(Ed.), Cognition and second language instructions (pp. 258–286). Cambridge University Press.

11.

Hulstijn

J.H.

Laufer

(2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.

12.

Jiang

(2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.

13.

Keating

G.D.

(2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12, 365–386.

14.

Kim

(2011). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition: Task-induced involvement and learner proficiency. Language Learning, 61, 100–140.

15.

Laufer

(2001). Reading, word-focused activities and incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Prospect, 16, 44–54. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ637433 (accessed May 2023).

16.

Laufer

(2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587.

17.

Laufer

(2013). Involvement load hypothesis. In Robinson

P.J.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 344–346). Routledge.

18.

Laufer

Girsai

(2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.

19.

Laufer

Goldstein

(2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399–436.

20.

Laufer

Hulstijn

(2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.

21.

Loewen

Plonsky

(2016). An A–Z of applied linguistics research methods. Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

Milton

(2010). The development of vocabulary breadth across the CEFR levels. In Bartning

Martin

Vedder

(Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 211–232). EuroSLA Monographs Series 1. European Second Language Association.

23.

Nation

I.S.P.

(2013). Learning vocabulary in another language. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.

24.

Schmitt

(2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.

25.

Schmitt

Clapham

(2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.

26.

Sonbul

Schmitt

(2010). Direct teaching of vocabulary after reading: Is it worth the effort? ELT Journal, 64, 253–260.

27.

Teng

(2020). Retention of new words learned incidentally from reading: Word exposure frequency, L1 marginal glosses, and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 24, 785–812.

28.

Vafaee

Suzuki

(2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 383–410.

29.

Webb

Nation

(2013). Teaching vocabulary. In Chappelle

(Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 5670–5677). Wiley-Blackwell.

30.

Webb

Newton

Chang

(2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91–120.

31.

Yanagisawa

Webb

(2022). Involvement load hypothesis plus: Creating an improved predictive model of incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44, 1279–1308.

32.

Yanagisawa

Webb

Uchihara

(2020). How do different forms of glossing contribute to L2 vocabulary learning from reading? A meta-regression analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 411–438.

33.

Zou

(2017). Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, sentence-writing and composition-writing: Extending the evaluation component of the involvement load hypothesis. Language Teaching Research, 21, 54–75.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB