Major advances have been made in understanding language learning strategies (LLS). However, rapid changes in human interaction induced by the internet and web 2.0 warrant a re-assessment of LLS in today’s context, especially vis-à-vis digital nativeness. Therefore, a large-scale quantitative investigation involving 891 college students was conducted. Their LLS use patterns and frequency and their level of digital fluency were examined using two instruments: Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and Teo’s Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). The participants reported moderate usage of all the strategies described in SILL. However, they reported using specific SILL categories (compensation, memory, and metacognitive) more frequently than others (social, cognitive, and affective). Participants with different levels of digital fluency showed significant variations in the frequency of use of LLS. Additionally, compared to previous generations, these modern participants adopted different usage patterns.
AkçayırM.DündarH.AkçayırG. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980?Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 435–440.
2.
AlhaysonyM. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7, 18–28.
3.
AmerstorferC. (2018). Past its expiry date? The SILL in modern mixed-methods strategy research. SSLLT, 8, 497–523.
4.
ArnoldJ. (1998). Towards more humanistic English teaching. ELT Journal, 52, 235–242.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
6.
BarakM. (2018). Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change. Computers and Education, 121, 115–123.
7.
BeatonA.GrunebergM.EllisN. (1995). Retention of foreign language vocabulary learned using the keyword method: A ten year follow up. Second Language Research, 11, 112–120.
8.
BennettS.MatonK. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26: 321–331.
9.
BoweB.J.WohnD.Y. (2015). Are there generational differences? Social media use and perceived shared reality. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 1–5). AMC Press.
10.
BremnerS. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 490–514.
11.
BruenJ. (2001). Strategies for Success: Profiling the effective learner of German. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 216–225.
12.
BruenJ. (2020). Language learning strategies for reading comprehension: Assessing the strategy use of young adults at beginners’ level taking Chinese, German, Japanese or Spanish as foreign languages at university. The Language Learning Journal, 48, 170–186.
13.
BugentalJ.F. (1964). The third force in psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 4, 19–26.
14.
BygateM. (1987). Speaking. Oxford University Press.
15.
Cáceres-LorenzoM. (2015). Teenagers learning Chinese as a foreign language in a European Confucius institute: The relationship between language learner strategies and successful learning factors. Language Awareness, 24, 255–272
16.
Calvo-FerrerJ.R. (2020). Exploring digital nativeness as a predictor of digital game-based L2 vocabulary acquisition. Interactive Learning Environments, 28, 902–914.
17.
ChamotA.U.El-DinaryP.B. (1999). Children’s learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 319–338.
18.
ChenA.H. (2009). Listening strategy instruction: Exploring Taiwanese college students’ strategy development. Asian EFL Journal, 11, 54–85.
19.
ChenM.L.HungL.M. (2012). Personality type, perceptual style preferences, and strategies for learning English as a foreign language. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40, 1501–1510.
20.
ChoiS. (2000). Teachers’ beliefs about communicative language teaching and their classroom teaching practices. English Teaching, 55, 3–32.
CohenA.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman.
23.
CohenA.D.GriffithsC. (2015). Revisiting LLS research 40 years later. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 414–429.
24.
CohenA.D.WeaverS.J.LiT.-Y. (1998). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. In CohenA.D. (Ed.), Strategies in learning and using a second language (pp. 107–156). Longman.
25.
CreswellJ.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Pearson.
26.
DabareraC.RenandyaW.A.ZhangL.J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473.
27.
De LariosJ.C.MurphyL.ManchonR. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: A study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 13–44.
28.
DonatoR.MacCormickD. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 453–464.
29.
DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
30.
DörnyeiZ.SkehanP. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In DoughtyC.J.LongM.H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Blackwell.
31.
EhrmanM.OxfordR.L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 72, 253–265.
32.
EhrmanM.OxfordR. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 311–327.
33.
FieldA. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition.Sage.
34.
ForbesK.FisherL. (2018). The impact of expanding advanced level secondary school students’ awareness and use of metacognitive learning strategies on confidence and proficiency in foreign language speaking skills. The Language Learning Journal, 46, 173–185.
35.
FornellC.LarckerD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
36.
GohC.KwahP. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 39–53.
37.
GreenJ.M.OxfordR. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261–297.
38.
GriffithsC. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367–383.
39.
GriffithsC. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In GriffithsC. (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83–98). Cambridge University Press.
40.
GriffithsC. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.
41.
GriffithsC. (2018). The strategy factor in successful language learning: The tornado effect. Multilingual Matters.
42.
GriffithsC. (2020). Language learning strategies: Is the baby still in the bathwater?Applied Linguistics, 41, 607–611.
43.
GriffithsC.OxfordR.L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1–10.
44.
GriffithsC.SoruçA. (2020). Language learning strategies. In GriffithsC.SoruçA. (Eds.), Individual differences in language learning (pp. 113–129). Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
GrigoryanT. (2018). Investigating digital native female learners’ attitudes towards paperless language learning. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1–17.
46.
GuS.-H.ChangY.-S.LeeJ.-Y.LinM.H. (2021). Broadcasting yourself via YouTube: Developing the speech of EFL students. TESOL Journal, 12, e00532.
47.
Gutiérrez-ÁngelN.Sánchez-GarcíaJ.N.Mercader-RubioI.García-MartínJ.Brito-CostaS. (2022). Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 896800.
48.
HabókA.MagyarA. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2358.
49.
HaythornthwaiteC.AndrewsR.FransmanJ.MeyersE.M. (Eds.). (2016). The Sage handbook of e-learning research. Sage.
50.
Hong-NamK.LeavellA.G. (2007). A comparative study of language learning strategy use in an EFL context: Monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean–Chinese university students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 71–88.
51.
HosenfeldC. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students’ strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9, 117–130.
52.
HsiaoT.OxfordR. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 368–383.
53.
HsuC.K.HwangG.J. (2014). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach for providing instant learning support in personal computer assembly activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 22, 687–703.
54.
HuG.W. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 635–660.
55.
HuangF.TeoT.HeJ. (2021). Digital nativity of university teachers in China: Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Digital Native Assessment Scale (DNAS). Interactive Learning Environments, 29, 385–399.
56.
HuangT. (2015). The technology transfer of the ICT curriculum in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35, 407–422.
57.
JangE.Y.JiménezR.T. (2011). A sociocultural perspective on second language learner strategies: Focus on the impact of social context. Theory into Practice, 50, 141–148.
58.
JinY.J.YooI.W. (2019). Why communicative language teaching has yet to work in Korea: Exploring teachers’ viewpoints. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16, 1332–1347.
59.
KarimiM.N. (2015). EFL learners’ multiple documents literacy: Effects of a strategy-directed intervention program. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 40–56.
60.
KelleyT.L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 17–24.
61.
KesharwaniA. (2020). Do (how) digital natives adopt a new technology differently than digital immigrants? A longitudinal study. Information and Management, 57, 103170.
62.
KhaldiehS.A. (2000). Learning strategies and writing processes of proficient vs. less-proficient learners of Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 522–533.
63.
KhodadadM.KaurJ. (2019). The relation of language learning strategy use with self-efficacy, motivation, and English language achievement. Journal of Modern Languages, 28, 1–19.
64.
KirschnerP.A.De BruyckereP. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
65.
KungF.W. (2017). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language in Taiwan: A socio-cultural analysis. TESL-EJ, 21, 1–15.
66.
LaiY.C. (2009). Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of university freshmen in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 255–280.
67.
LaiY.C. (2013). Integrating vocabulary learning strategy instruction into EFL classrooms. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 10, 37–76.
68.
LanR.OxfordR.L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41, 339–379.
69.
LeeJ.-Y. (2019a). Teaching test-taking strategies to EFL student readers with different language proficiencies: An empirical reassessment. ESP Today, 7, 165–181.
70.
LeeJ.-Y. (2019b). Pedagogical effects of teaching test-taking strategies to EFL college students. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31, 226–248.
71.
LiaoY.F. (2000). A study of Taiwanese junior high school students’ EFL learning motivation and learning strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
72.
LiawS.S.HuangH.M. (2003). Exploring the World Wide Web for online learning: A perspective from Taiwan. Educational Technology, 43, 27–32.
73.
LinM.H. (2021). Effects of data-driven learning on college students of different grammar proficiencies: A Preliminary empirical assessment in EFL classes. SAGE Open, 11, 1–15.
74.
LittlejohnA.BeethamH.McGillL. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 547–556.
75.
LiuZ.YangC.RüdianS., et al. (2019). Temporal emotion-aspect modeling for discovering what students are concerned about in online course forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 27, 598–627.
76.
MaR.OxfordR.L. (2014). A diary study focusing on listening and speaking: The evolving interaction of learning styles and learning strategies in a motivated, advanced ESL learner. System, 43, 101–113.
77.
MacaroE. (2000). Learner strategies in foreign language learning: Cross national factors. Tuttitalia, 22, 9–18.
78.
MacaroE. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 320–337.
79.
MagogweJ.M.OliverR. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338–352.
80.
MargaryanA.LittlejohnA.VojtG. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers and Education, 56, 429–440.
81.
McLaughlinB. (1987). Theories of second language learning. Arnold.
82.
MeyersE.M.EricksonI.SmallR.V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38, 355–367.
83.
MillerC.BartlettJ. (2012). ‘Digital fluency’: Towards young people’s critical use of the internet. Journal of Information Literacy, 6, 35–55.
84.
NgW. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?Computers and Education, 59, 1065–1078.
85.
NgoN. (2019). Understanding the impact of listening strategy instruction on listening strategy use from a socio-cultural perspective. System, 81, 63–77.
86.
NunanD. (2012). Learner-centered English language education: The selected works of David Nunan. Routledge.
87.
NunanD. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: An introduction. Routledge.
88.
OblingerD.G.OblingerJ.L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In OblingerD.G.OblingerJ.L.LippincottJ.K. (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). Educause.
89.
O’MalleyJ.M.ChamotA. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
90.
O’MalleyJ.M.ChamotA.U.Stewner-ManzanaresG.KupperL.RussoR.P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.
91.
OxfordR.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle.
92.
OxfordR.L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44, 167–180.
93.
OxfordR.L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. 1st edition. Routledge.
94.
OxfordR.L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. 2nd edition.Routledge.
95.
OxfordR.L.AmerstorferC.M. (Eds.). (2019). Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts. Bloomsbury.
96.
OxfordR.L.Burry-StockJ.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23, 1–23.
97.
OxfordR.L.NyikosM. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.
98.
PalfreyJ.GasserU. (2008). Opening universities in a digital era. New England Journal of Higher Education, 23, 22–24.
99.
PapadopoulouI.KantaridouZ.PlatsidouM.GavriilidouZ. (2018). The SILL revisited in light of the S2R model of language learning. The Language Learning Journal, 46, 544–556.
100.
ParkG. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean University students. Foreign Language Annuals, 30, 211–221.
101.
PawlakM. (2018). Grammar learning strategy inventory: Another look. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 351–379.
102.
PawlakM. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25, 817–835.
103.
PeacockM.HoB. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179–200.
104.
PengJ.E.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.
105.
PlonskyL. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61, 993–1038.
106.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
107.
PujadasG.MuñozC. (2020). Examining adolescent EFL learners’ TV viewing comprehension through captions and subtitles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 551–575.
108.
QinL.T.ZhangJ.L. (2019). English as a foreign language writers’ metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments. Journal of Writing Research, 12, 394–413.
109.
RadwanA.A. (2011). Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by university students majoring in English. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13, 114–163.
110.
RaoZ. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: Interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44, 90–106.
111.
Rees-MillerJ. (1993). A critical appraisal of learner training: Theoretical bases and teaching implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 679–689.
112.
RigneyJ.W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In O’NeilH.FJr.. (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp. 165–205). Academic.
113.
RubinJ. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.
114.
SalahshourF.SharifiM.SalahshourN. (2013). The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 634–643.
115.
SandarsJ.MorrisonC. (2007). What is the Net Generation? The challenge for future medical education. Medical Teacher, 29, 85–88.
116.
SavignonS.J. (1987). Communicative language teaching. Theory into Practice, 26, 235–242.
117.
SavignonS.J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 261–278.
118.
SchwartzA.I.MendozaL.MeyerB. (2017). The impact of text structure reading strategy instruction in a second language: Benefits across languages. The Language Learning Journal, 45, 263–281.
119.
ShangH.F. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12, 18–42.
120.
SternH.H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner?Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304–318.
121.
StevickE.W. (1980). Teaching languages: A way and ways. Newbury House.
122.
StevickE.W. (1990). Humanism in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
123.
SunZ.LinC.H.YouJ., et al. (2017). Improving the English-speaking skills of young learners through mobile social networking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 304–324.
124.
Suša VugecD.StjepićA.M. (2022). Digital literacy of digital natives. In MachadoC. (Ed.), Technological challenges (pp. 61–91). Springer.
125.
SuwanarakK. (2019). Use of learning strategies and their effects on English language learning of Thai adult learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 25, 99–120.
126.
TanK.E.NgM.L.Y.SawK.G. (2010). Online activities and writing practices of urban Malaysian adolescents. System, 38, 548–559.
127.
TangM.TianJ. (2015). Associations between Chinese EFL graduate students’ beliefs and language learning strategies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18, 131–152.
128.
TapscottD. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net generation. McGraw-Hill.
129.
TapscottD. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill.
130.
TeoT. (2013). An initial development and validation of a digital natives assessment scale (DNAS). Computers and Education, 67, 51–57.
131.
TeoT.YurdakulI.K.UrsavaşÖ.F. (2016). Exploring the digital natives among pre-service teachers in Turkey: A cross-cultural validation of the digital native assessment scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1231–1244.
132.
ThomasN.BowenN.E.J.A.RoseH. (2021). A diachronic analysis of explicit definitions and implicit conceptualizations of language learning strategies. System, 103, 102619.
133.
ThompsonP. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers and Education, 65, 12–33.
134.
TsaiC.C.ChenN.S.ChenG.D. (2010). The current status and future of e-learning in Taiwan. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 5–7.
135.
TsaiC.I. (2003). Anxiety and beliefs about language learning: A study of Taiwanese college students learning English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA.
136.
VandergriftL. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387–409.
137.
WendenA. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In WendenA.RubinJ. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 3–13). Prentice Hall.
138.
WhartonG. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50, 203–243.
139.
WilsonM.L.HallJ.A.MulderD.J. (2022). Assessing digital nativeness in pre-service teachers: Analysis of the digital natives assessment scale and implications for practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54, 249–266.
140.
WoodrowL. (2005). The challenge of measuring language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 90–98.
141.
WuP.H.HwangG.J.MilradM.KeH.R.HuangY.M. (2012). An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 217–232.
142.
YangS.C.ChenY.J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 860–879.
143.
YangW. (2017). From similarity to diversity: The changing use of language learning strategies in content and language integrated learning at the tertiary level in Taiwan. English Teaching and Learning, 41, 1–32.
144.
YılmazC. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 682–687.
145.
ZhangL.J.GuP.Y.HuG. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean primary school pupils’ use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 245–271.
146.
ZhangL.J.ThomasN.QinT.L. (2019). Language learning strategy research in System: Looking back and looking forward. System, 84, 87–92.
