A serial mediation model testing associations between teacher–student relationship,resilience,autonomous learning and academic performance in the Chinese EFL context
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2026
A serial mediation model testing associations between teacher–student relationship,resilience,autonomous learning and academic performance in the Chinese EFL context
The current study investigated the relationship between students’ perceived teacher–student relationship (SPTSR) and their performance in English via multiple mediation effects of resilience and autonomous learning in the Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) context. The participants were 15,184 eighth-graders from China. Results of the multilevel mediation model revealed that after controlling for students’ gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and school type, the positive association between SPTSR and students’ academic outcomes in English was partially and serially mediated by the resilience and autonomous learning. The current study sheds new light on the crucial mediating roles of resilience and autonomous learning in improving EFL learners’ English proficiency. We recommend that English language teachers establish a friendly and equal classroom climate, which may enhance students’ resilience to cope with learning setbacks. Such positive beliefs help stimulate students’ autonomy in English language learning, which in turn promotes performance in learning English.
AgasistiT.AvvisatiF.BorgonoviF.LongobardiS. (2018). Academic resilience: What schools and countries do to help disadvantaged students succeed in PISA. OECD Education Working Papers, 167. OECD.
2.
AhmedW.MinnaertA.van der WerfG.KuyperH. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 36–46.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
5.
BensonP. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge.
6.
BircanH.SungurS. (2016). The role of motivation and cognitive engagement in English achievement. Science Education International, 27, 509–529.
7.
BorgS.AlshumaimeriY. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23, 9–38.
8.
BostwickK.C.P.MartinA.J.CollieR.J., et al. (2022). Academic buoyancy in high school: A cross-lagged multilevel modeling approach exploring reciprocal effects with perceived school support, motivation, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114, 1931–1949.
9.
BowlbyJ.AinsworthM. (2013). The origins of attachment theory. Attachment Theory: Social, Developmental, and Clinical Perspectives, 45, 759–775.
10.
BrownG.T.L.GaoL. (2015). Chinese teachers’ conceptions of assessment for and of learning: Six competing and complementary purposes. Cogent Education, 2, 993836.
11.
BruceJ. (2008). Teacher–student relationships which promote resilience at school: A micro-level analysis of students’ views. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 36, 385–398.
12.
BryanJ.WilliamsJ.M.GriffinD. (2020). Fostering educational resilience and opportunities in urban schools through equity-focused school–family–community partnerships. Professional School Counseling, 23, 1–14.
13.
ChenJ.J.JiangT.N.LiuM.F. (2021). Family socioeconomic status and learning engagement in Chinese adolescents: The multiple mediating roles of resilience and future orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 714346.
14.
ChengC. (1998). Getting the right kind of support: Functional differences in the types of social support on depression for Chinese adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 845–849.
15.
ChengJ.RajG.S.AiJ.T.T. (2018). The correlations among learning motivation, autonomy and language proficiency in Chinese EFL context. Learn Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 11, 1–14.
16.
ChengL. (2008). The key to success: English language testing in China. Language Testing, 25, 15–37.
17.
ConnorK.M.DavidsonJ.R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor–Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76–82.
18.
DaneshJ.ShahnazariM. (2020). A structural relationship model for resilience, L2 learning motivation, and L2 proficiency at different proficiency levels. Learning and Motivation, 72, 101636.
19.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
20.
DemaC.SinwongsuwatK. (2020). Enhancing EFL students’ autonomous learning of English conversation during COVID-19 via language-in-talk log assignments. The Quarterly Review, 3, 598–615.
21.
DongQ.LinC.D. (2011). 儿童及青少年学业成就测验 [Children and adolescents’ academic achievement test]. In DongQ.LinC.D. (Eds.), 中国儿童青少年心理发育标准化测验简介 [Introduction to standardized tests about Chinese children’s and adolescent’s psychological development] (pp. 62–108). Science Press.
22.
EwijkR.V.SleegersP. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5, 134–150.
23.
FangG.ChanP.W.K.KalogeropoulosP. (2020). Social support and academic achievement of chinese low-income children: A mediation effect of academic resilience. International Journal of Psychological Research, 13, 19–28.
24.
FauziC.BasikinM.ShD.KassymovaG. (2020). Exploring EFL student teachers readiness and gender differences of learner autonomy. Научный Журнал «Вестник НАН РК», 1, 288–299.
25.
García-MartínezI.Augusto-LandaJ.M.Quijano-LópezR.LeónS.P. (2022). Self-concept as a mediator of the relation between university students’ resilience and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 747168.
26.
GaritaC.O.ElizondoL.B. (2013). A closer look into learner autonomy in the EFL classroom. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 19, 325–343.
27.
GhorbaniM.R.GolparvarS.E. (2020). Modeling the relationship between socioeconomic status, self-initiated, technology-enhanced language learning, and language outcome. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33, 607–627.
28.
HiverP.SolarteA. C. S.WhitesideZ.KimC. J.WhiteheadG. E. (2021). The role of language teacher metacognition and executive function in exemplary classroom practice. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 484-506.
29.
HuangF.L. (2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 492–499.
30.
HughesJ.N. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and school adjustment: Progress and remaining challenges. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 319–327.
JenningsP.A.GreenbergM.T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525.
33.
JiangY. (2021). Challenges of implementing inquiry-based learning in Chinese secondary school EFL classrooms: A review of teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 16, 1–21.
34.
JiangY.SongR. (2019). Gender differences in freshmen’s English autonomous learning activities. In: 5th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2019) (pp. 56–59). Atlantis Press.
35.
JonesM.G.WheatleyJ. (1990). Gender differences in teacher–student interactions in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 861–874.
36.
KajabadiP.MohammadiR.PahlavaniP. (2016). The relationship between EFL learners’ resilience and autonomous learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5, 163–167.
37.
KaurA.HangB.T.T.NurA.H.B. (2017). A self-determination theory based motivational model on intentions to drop out of vocational schools in Vietnam. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14, 1–21.
38.
KimT.H.LeeS.M.YuK.LeeS.PuigA. (2005). Hope and the meaning of life as influences on Korean adolescents’ resilience: Implications for counselors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6, 143–152.
39.
KimT.Y.KimY.K. (2017). The impact of resilience on L2 learners’ motivated behavior and proficiency in L2 learning. Educational Studies, 43, 1–15.
40.
KingR.B.McInerneyD.M.WatkinsD.A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 814–819.
41.
KlingerD.A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25, 41–54.
42.
KormosJ.KiddleT. (2013). The role of socio-economic factors in motivation to learn English as a foreign language: The case of Chile. System, 41, 399–412.
LeeJ.C.K.YinH.ZhangZ. (2010). Adaptation and analysis of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in the Chinese setting. International Journal of Testing, 10, 149–165.
45.
LiC. (2005). Prestige stratification in the contemporary China: Occupational prestige measures and socio-economic index. Sociological Research, 2, 74–102.
46.
LiuH.LiuQ.DuX.LiuJ.SchumackerR.E. (2021). Teacher–student relationship as a protective factor for socioeconomic status, students’ self-efficacy and achievement: A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Current Psychology. Epub ahead of print 2 April 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01598-7
47.
LubisA. (2021). EFL teacher’s roles to foster learner autonomy: Ideals and realities in flipped learning. In Proceedings of the 11th AISOFOLL: Facing Industrial Revolution 4.0 through Language Education, Jakarta, Indonesia (pp. 89–103). SEAMEO QITEP in Language.
48.
Luceño-MorenoL.Talavera-VelascoB.García-AlbuerneY.Martín-GarcíaJ. (2020). Symptoms of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, levels of resilience and burnout in Spanish health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 5514.
49.
MaL.H.DuX.F.HauK.T.LiuJ. (2017). The association between teacher–student relationships and academic achievement in Chinese EFL context: A serial multiple mediation model. Educational Psychology, 38, 687–707.
50.
MartinA.J.DowsonM. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327–365.
51.
McLaughlinM.W.TalbertJ.E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement: Volume 45. Teachers College Press.
52.
McNealR.B. (2012). Checking in or checking out? Investigating the parent involvement reactive hypothesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 79–89.
53.
Mikocka-WalusA.StokesM.EvansS.OliveL.WestruppE. (2021). Finding the power within and without: How can we strengthen resilience against symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression in Australian parents during the COVID-19 pandemic?Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 145, 110433.
54.
MoralesE.E. (2008). Exceptional female students of color: Academic resilience and gender in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 197–213.
55.
MyersH.F.TaylorS. (1998). Family contributions to risk and resilience in African American children. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 215–229.
56.
NajafzadehM.GhanizadehA.JahedizadehS. (2018). A dynamic model of EFL learners’ personal best goals, resilience, and language achievement. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 267–296.
57.
Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. PISA, OECD.
58.
Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. PISA, OECD.
59.
Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. PISA, OECD.
60.
Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Low-performing students: Why they fall behind and how to help them succeed. PISA, OECD.
61.
Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. Revised edition. PISA, OECD.
62.
OzerO.YukselirC. (2023). ‘Am I aware of my roles as a learner?’ The relationships of learner autonomy, self-direction and goal commitment to academic achievement among Turkish EFL learners. Language Awareness, 32, 19–38.
63.
OzturgutO. (2011). Standardized testing in the case of china and the lessons to be learned for the US. Journal of International Education Research, 7(2), 1–6.
64.
Palomar-LeverJ.Victorio-EstradaA. (2017). Academic success of adolescents in poverty. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 669–691.
65.
PhuongY.H.VoP.Q. (2019). Students’ learning autonomy, involvement and motivation towards their English proficiency. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 4, 1–12.
66.
PutwainD.W.NicholsonL.J.ConnorsL.WoodsK. (2013). Resilient children are less test anxious and perform better in tests at the end of primary schooling. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 41–46.
67.
QiG.Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China: Perceptions of students. Multilingual Education, 6, 1–18.
68.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd edition.Sage.
69.
ReeveJ. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In ChiaL.W.KengJ.W.CRyanR.M. (Eds.), Building autonomous learners (pp. 129–152). Springer.
70.
ReeveJ.CheonS.H.YuT.H. (2020). An autonomy-supportive intervention to develop students’ resilience by boosting agentic engagement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44, 325–338.
71.
RoordaD.L.KoomenH.M.Y.SpiltJ.L.OortF.J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.
72.
Şakrak-EkinG.BalcikanliC. (2019). Does autonomy really matter in language learning?Journal of Language and Education, 5, 98–111.
73.
Salazar-AyalaC.M.Gastélum-CuadrasG.HernándezE.H.Moreno-MurciaJ.A. (2021). Autonomy support in student’s resilience through a cognitive-social model of motivation. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 14, 1–16.
74.
SariF.W. (2020). Inquiry based teaching in writing classroom: The effectiveness to the students’ creativity. Journal of English Language Teaching and Islamic Integration, 3, 244–264.
75.
SaseA.S.AbdelaalN.M.AmhimmidN.S. (2015). Investigating motivation among Libyan high school students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5, 59–65.
76.
ScalesP.C.BoekelM.V.PekelK.SyvertsenA.K.RoehlkepartainE.C. (2020). Effects of developmental relationships with teachers on middle-school students’ motivation and performance. Psychology in the Schools, 57, 1–32.
77.
SchunkD.H. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In HarrisK.R.GrahamS.UrdanT., et al. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Volume 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 101–123). American Psychological Association.
78.
ShanZ.MengQ. (2006). The development of autonomous learning questionnaire for middle school students. Psychological Science, 29, 1422–1424.
79.
ShiL. (2006). The successors to Confucianism or a new generation? A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, culture and curriculum, 19, 122–147.
80.
SprattM.HumphreysG.ChanV. (2002). Autonomy & motivation: Which comes first?Language Teaching Research, 6, 245–266.
81.
TengY.WangX. (2021). The effect of two educational technology tools on student engagement in Chinese EFL courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1–15.
82.
TianL.LiuB.HuangS.HuebnerE.S. (2013). Perceived social support and school well-being among Chinese early and middle adolescents: The mediational role of self-esteem. Social Indicators Research, 113, 991–1008.
83.
TılfarlıoğluF. Y.ÇiftçiF. Ş. (2011). Supporting self-efficacy and learner autonomy in relation to academic success in EFL classrooms (A case study). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 1284–1294.
84.
TomblinJ.B.OlesonJ.AmbroseS.E.WalkerE.A.MoellerM.P. (2020). Early literacy predictors and second-grade outcomes in children who are hard of hearing. Child Development, 91, e179.
85.
UçarF.M.SungurS. (2017). The role of perceived classroom goal structures, self-efficacy, and engagement in student English achievement. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35, 149–168.
86.
VerschuerenK.KoomenH.M. (2012). Teacher–child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 205–211.
87.
VuT.Magis-WeinbergL.JansenB.R.J., et al. (2022). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 39–71.
88.
WangC.BaiB. (2017). Validating the instruments to measure ESL/EFL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 931–947.
89.
WangC.XiaY.LiW., et al. (2016). Parenting behaviors, adolescent depressive symptoms, and problem behavior: The role of self-esteem and school adjustment difficulties among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 520–542.
90.
WangL.ShiZ.ZhangY.ZhangZ. (2010). Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese earthquake victims. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 64, 499–504.
91.
WeiM.Den BrokP.ZhouY. (2009). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and student achievement in English as a foreign language classrooms in China. Learning Environments Research, 12, 157–174.
92.
WeiM.ZhouY.BarberC.BrokP.D. (2015). Chinese students’ perceptions of teacher–student interpersonal behavior and implications. System, 55, 134–144.
93.
WeiX. (2019). Research on the development strategy of cross-cultural ecological education in English translation teaching at colleges. Ekoloji, 28, 1665–1669.
94.
WigfieldA.TonksS. (2002). Adolescents’ expectancies for success and achievement task values during the middle and high school years. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 53–82). Information Age.
95.
XuanX.XueY.ZhangC., et al. (2019). Relationship among school socioeconomic status, teacher–student relationship, and middle school students’ academic achievement in China: Using the multilevel mediation model. PLoS ONE, 14, e0213783.
96.
YangC.BearG.G.ChenF.F.ZhangW.BlankJ.C.HuangX. (2013). Students’ perceptions of school climate in the US and China. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 7–24.
97.
YangY. (2004). A brief introduction to high school education in China. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 21–22, 6–14.
98.
YipW.M.C. (2013). The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI-C). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 396–403.
99.
ZhangM.BaiY.LiZ. (2020). Effect of resilience on the mental health of special education teachers: Moderating effect of teaching barriers. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 537–544.
