This study examined changes in undergraduate students’ language mindsets and academic writing competence as a result of taking a one-semester English for academic purposes (EAP) writing course with a pre–post intervention on mindset. A total of 319 students participated in the study and completed a 10-week EAP course. The participants were administered the mindset questionnaire and the writing test at two different time-points. The results showed that the participants’ level in one component of growth language mindset (general language intelligence beliefs), and scores on the writing test increased significantly. The results of the latent profile analysis revealed three distinctive profiles among the participants at both time-points: Growth profile, Mixed profile, and Fixed profile. The Growth and Mixed profiles were found to perform significantly better than the Fixed profile on the writing tests. Finally, the result of a latent transition analysis revealed that dynamic shifts in the profile membership could occur through the mindset intervention.
BirdsongD. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In BirdsongD. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 1–22). Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BitchenerJ.FerrisD.R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
3.
BlackwellL.S.TrzesniewskiK.H.DweckC.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
4.
BurnetteJ.L.O’BoyleE.H.VanEppsE.M.PollackJ.M.FinkelE.J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701.
5.
CarrollJ.B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In DillerK.C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Newbury House.
6.
CeleuxG.SoromenhoG. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212.
7.
ChenJ.A.TutwilerM.S. (2017). Implicit theories of ability and self-efficacy: Testing alternative social cognitive models to science motivation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 127–136.
8.
CoxheadA. (2016). Acquiring academic and disciplinary vocabulary. In HylandK.ShawP. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 177–190). Routledge.
9.
CrossleyS.A.KyleK.McNamaraD.S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16.
10.
CrowtherD.KimS.LeeJ.LimJ.LoewenS. (2021). Methodological synthesis of cluster analysis in second language research. Language Learning, 71, 99–130.
11.
DeKeyserR.M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.
12.
DemarayM.K.MaleckiC.K.RyooJ.H.SummersK.H. (2021). Deconstructing bullying roles: A longitudinal latent profile analysis of bullying participant behaviors for students in grades 4 through 12. Journal of School Psychology, 86, 32–48.
13.
DweckC.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
14.
DweckC.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
15.
DweckC.S.LeggettE.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
16.
DweckC.S.YeagerD.S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 481–496.
17.
DweckC.S.ChiuC.Y.HongY.Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.
ErenA.Rakıcıoğlu-SöylemezA. (2020). Language mindsets, perceived instrumentality, engagement and graded performance in English as a foreign language students. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 22September2020. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820958400
21.
FerrisD.R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press.
22.
GardnerH. (1993) Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books.
23.
HagenaarsJ.A.McCutcheonA.L. (Eds.). (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press.
24.
HongY.-y.ChiuC.-y.DweckC.S.LinD.M.-S.WanW. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599.
25.
HorwitzE.K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294.
26.
HowardM.C.HoffmanM.E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods, 21, 846–876.
27.
HylandK. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164.
28.
HylandK. (2008). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41, 543–562.
29.
HylandK. (2016). General and specific EAP. In HylandK.ShawP. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 17–29). Routledge.
30.
JinS.LeeH. (2022). Willingness to communicate and its high-evidence factors: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41, 716–745.
31.
KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.HaririJ. (2021). A closer look at grit and language mindset as predictors of foreign language achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 379–402.
32.
KhajavyG.H.PourtahmasbF.LiC. (2022). Examining the domain-specificity of language mindset: A case of L2 reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16, 208–220.
33.
LaneJ.LangeE. (2011). Writing clearly: Grammar for editing. 3rd edition. Heinle.
34.
LeeH.LeeJ.H. (2022). Interpreting the effectiveness of academic English writing programmes in higher education: A meta-analysis. Oxford Review of Education. Epub ahead of print 17May2022. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2022.2072284
35.
LeeH.JungG.LeeJ.H. (2022). Simple view of second language reading: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26, 585–603.
36.
LeeH.WarschauerM.LeeJ.H. (2019). Advancing CALL research via data-mining techniques: Unearthing hidden groups of learners in a corpus-based L2 vocabulary learning experiment. ReCALL, 31, 135–149.
37.
LeeH.WarschauerM.LeeJ.H. (2020). Toward the establishment of a data-driven learning model: Role of learner factors in corpus-based second language vocabulary learning. The Modern Language Journal, 104, 345–362.
38.
LekiI. (2006). ‘You cannot ignore’: L2 graduate students’ response to discipline-based written feedback. In HylandK.HylandF. (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 266–285). Cambridge University Press.
39.
LiuM.Oga-BaldwinW.Q. (2022). Motivational profiles of learners of multiple foreign languages: A self-determination theory perspective. System, 106, 102762.
40.
LoY.MendellN.R.RubinD.B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.
41.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33.
42.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 214–243.
43.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019a). Language mindsets, meaning-making, and motivation. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 537–559). Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019b). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, 102126.
45.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019c). Sensitivity to language-based rejection in intercultural communication: The role of language mindsets and implications for migrants’ cross-cultural adaptation. Applied Linguistics, 40, 478–505.
46.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2020). Breaking the vicious cycle of language anxiety: Growth language mindsets improve lower-competence ESL students’ intercultural interactions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101847.
47.
LouN.M.ChaffeeK.E.NoelsK.A. (2022). Growth, fixed and mixed mindsets: Mindset system profiles in foreign language learners and their roles in engagement and achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44, 607–632.
48.
MatsumotoH.NakayamaA.HiromoriT. (2013). Exploring the development of individual difference profiles in L2 reading. System, 41, 994–1005.
49.
MazgutovaD.KormosJ. (2015). Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for academic purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3–15.
50.
MercerS.RyanS. (2010). A mindset for EFL: Learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal, 64, 436–444.
51.
NylundK.L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB.O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
52.
ParkJ. (2015). Implementing extensive reading in university EAP writing classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, HI, Honolulu.
53.
RyanS.MercerS. (2012). Implicit theories: Language learning mindsets. In MercerS.RyanS.WilliamsM. (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 74–89). Palgrave Macmillan.
SkehanP. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.
56.
StaplesS.BiberD. (2015). Cluster analysis. In PlonskyL. (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 243–274). Routledge.
57.
von EyeA.BogatG.A. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 52, 390–420. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/mpq/vol52/iss3/3/ (accessed November 2022).
58.
WallerL.PapiM. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65.
59.
WangH.PengA.PattersonM.M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99, 102529.
60.
YamamoriK.IsodaT.HiromoriT.OxfordR.L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 381–409.
61.
YaoY.GuoN.S.LiC.McCampbellD. (2021). How university EFL writers’ beliefs in writing ability impact their perceptions of peer assessment: Perspectives from implicit theories of intelligence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46, 151–167.
62.
YaoY.WangW.YangX. (2021). Perceptions of the inclusion of automatic writing evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study. Assessing Writing, 50, 100568.
63.
YeagerD.S.HanselmanP.WaltonG.M., et al. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369.
64.
YeagerD.S.RomeroC.PauneskuD., et al. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374–391.
65.
YuJ.McLellanR. (2020). Same mindset, different goals and motivational frameworks: Profiles of mindset-based meaning systems. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101901.
