There is an increasing recognition that effective deployment of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies is essential for the development of second/foreign language learners’ abilities to accomplish learning goals. Within models of SRL, a prerequisite for the active employment of SRL strategies is learners’ self-efficacy, which interacts with strategy use in all phases. In the domain of second language (L2) writing, previous research mainly adopted a variable-centred approach to investigate the relationship between SRL strategy use and self-efficacy whereas person-centred questions have largely been neglected. Performing latent profile analysis (LPA) with undergraduate students of English as a foreign language (EFL), we identified three SRL profiles that differed quantitatively concerning levels of self-efficacy. The efficacious self-regulators with the highest levels of cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational components of SRL reported the highest levels of self-efficacy, followed by the moderate strategists; EFL learners with the lowest levels on the main SRL components reported the lowest writing self-efficacy score. Learners of different profiles differed significantly in a writing performance test with the efficacious self-regulators outperforming the other two profiles. Implications for self-regulated language learning and L2 writing instruction are discussed.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.
2.
ArteltC.BaumertJ.Julius-McElvanyN.PescharJ. (2004). Learners for life: Student approaches to learning. Results from PISA 2000. OECD.
3.
BaiB.GuoW. (2018). Influences of self-regulated learning strategy use on self-efficacy in primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34, 523–536.
4.
BaiB.WangJ.ZhouH. (2021). An intervention study to improve primary school students’ self-regulated strategy use in English writing through e-learning in Hong Kong. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Epub ahead of print 4March2021. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1871030.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice.
6.
BanduraA. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In DienstbierR.A. (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation: Nebraska symposium on motivation, Volume 38 (pp. 69–164). University of Nebraska Press.
7.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
8.
BerlinK.S.WilliamsN.A.ParraG.R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (Part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 174–187.
9.
BernackiM.L.Nokes-MalachT.J.AlevenV. (2015). Examining self-efficacy during learning: variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 99–117.
10.
BruningR.DempseyM.KauffmanD.F.McKimC.ZumbrunnS. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 25–38.
11.
ButlerJ.A.BrittM.A. (2011). Investigating instruction for improving revision of argumentative essays. Written Communication, 28, 70–96.
ChenJ.ZhangL.J.WangX.ZhangT.T. (2021). Influences of SRSD revision instruction on English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students’ self-efficacy for text revision: A mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 670100.
14.
ChonY.V.ShinT. (2019). Profile of second language learners’ metacognitive awareness and academic motivation for successful listening: A latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 62–75.
15.
CsizérK.TankóG. (2017). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38, 386–404.
16.
DörrenbächerL.PerelsF. (2016). Self-regulated learning profiles in college students: Their relationship to achievement, personality, and the effectiveness of an intervention to foster self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 229–241.
17.
EfklidesA. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 6–25.
18.
EkholmE.ZumbrunnS.ConklinS. (2015). The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: Writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable. Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 197–207.
19.
FungD.MacaroE. (2019). Exploring the relationship between linguistic knowledge and strategy use in listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 25, 540–564.
20.
GrahamS.MacaroE. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–783.
21.
GrahamS.WooreR.PorterA.CourtneyL.SavoryC. (2020), Navigating the challenges of L2 reading: Self-efficacy, self-regulatory reading strategies, and learner profiles. Modern Language Journal, 104, 693–714.
22.
GrahamS.HarrisK.R.MasonL. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241.
23.
GuoW.BaiB. (2022). Effects of self-regulated learning strategy use on motivation in EFL writing: A comparison between high and low achievers in Hong Kong primary schools. Applied Linguistics Review, 13, 117–139.
24.
HarrisK.R.GrahamS. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 113–135.
25.
HoltomB.C.BurtonJ.P.CrossleyC.D. (2012). How negative affectivity moderates the relationship between shocks, embeddedness and worker behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 434–443.
26.
KaplanA.LichtingerE.GorodetskyM. (2009). Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 51–69.
27.
KarlenY. (2016) Differences in students’ metacognitive strategy knowledge, motivation, and strategy use: A typology of self-regulated learners. Journal of Educational Research, 109, 253–265.
28.
KimD.WangC.AhnH.S.BongM. (2015). English language learners’ self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 136–142.
29.
KormosJ.CsizérK. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behaviour in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 275–299.
30.
LangeheineR.PannekoekJ.vandePolF. (1996). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in categorical data analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 249–264.
31.
LiY.LiX.SuY.PengY.YuH. (2020). Exploring the role of EFL learners’ online self-regulation profiles in their social regulation of learning in wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. Journal of Computers in Education, 7, 575–595.
32.
LimpoT.AlvesR.A.FidalgoR. (2014). Children’s high-level writing skills: development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 177–193.
33.
LinL.GongY.XuN. (2021). Online self-regulated learning profiles: A study of Chinese as a foreign language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 797786.
34.
MacArthurC.A. (2015). Instruction in Evaluation and Revision. In MacArthurC.A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 272–287). Guilford Publications.
35.
MillsS.J. (2012). The effects of instruction in peer-revision on the persuasive writing of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. Unpublished doctoral thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
36.
MuthénB. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In MarcoulidesG.A.SchumackerR.E. (Eds.). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Erlbaum.
37.
MuthénB. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In KaplanD. (Ed.). Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Sage.
38.
MuthénB.MuthénL.K. (2006). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.
39.
NylundK.L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB.O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569.
40.
OxfordR.L. (2013). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. 2nd edition.Pearson.
41.
PanaderoE. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.
42.
PapiM.TeimouriY. (2014). Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study. Language Learning, 64, 493–525.
43.
RoseH.BriggsJ.G.BoggsJ.A.SergioL.Ivanova-SlavianskaiaN. (2018). A systematic review of language learner strategy research in the face of self-regulation. System, 72, 151–163.
44.
SchwarzG. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
45.
ShenB.BaiB. (2022). Chinese university students’ self-regulated writing strategy use and EFL writing performance: influences of self-efficacy, gender, and major. Applied Linguistics Review. Epub ahead of print 25April2022. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2020-0103.
46.
SpurkD.HirschiA.DriesN. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of objective versus subjective career success. Competing Journal of Management, 1, 35–69.
47.
StaplesS.BiberD. (2015). Cluster analysis. In PlonskyL. (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 243–274). Routledge.
48.
SunT.WangC. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, 102221.
49.
SunQ.Y.ZhangL.J. (2022). Examining the effects of English as a foreign language student-writers’ metacognitive experiences on their writing performance. Current Psychology. Epub ahead of print 27July2022. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03416-0.
50.
SunQ.Y.ZhangL.J.CarterS. (2021). Investigating students’ metacognitive experiences: Insights from the English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing Metacognitive Experiences Questionnaire (EFLLWMEQ). Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 744842.
51.
TeinJ.Y.CoxeS.ChamH. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 640–657.
52.
TengL.S. (2021). Individual differences in self-regulated learning: Exploring the nexus of motivational beliefs, self-efficacy, and SRL strategies in EFL writing. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 16April2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211006881.
53.
TengL.S.ZhangL.J. (2016). A Questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 100, 674–701.
54.
TengL.S.ZhangL.J. (2018). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 213–240.
55.
TengL.S.ZhangL.J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference?Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701.
56.
TengL.S.ZhangL.J. (2022). Can self-regulation be transferred to second/foreign language learning and teaching? Current status, controversies, and future directions. Applied Linguistics, 43, 587–595.
57.
TengL.S.SunP.P.XuL. (2018). Conceptualizing writing self-efficacy in English-as-a-foreign-language contexts: Scale validation through structural equation modelling. TESOL Quarterly, 52, 911–942.
58.
TengM.F.WangC.ZhangL.J. (2022). Assessing self-regulatory writing strategies and their predictive effects on young EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 51, 100573.
59.
VargheseS.A.AbrahamS.A. (1998). Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 287–306.
60.
WangY.ShenB.YuX. (2021). A latent profile analysis of EFL learners’ self-efficacy: Associations with academic emotions and language proficiency. System, 103, 102633.
61.
WinneP.H.HadwinA.F. (2010). Self-regulated learning and socio-cognitive theory. In PenelopeP.EvaB.McGawB. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 503–508). Elsevier.
62.
YamamoriK.IsodaT.HiromoriT.OxfordR.L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language, 41, 381–410.
63.
YusoffY.M. (2012). Self-efficacy, perceived social support, and psychological adjustment in international undergraduate students in a public higher education institution in Malaysia. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16, 353–371.
64.
ZhangL.J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 320–353.
65.
ZhangL.J. (2022). L2 writing: Toward a theory-practice praxis. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning (pp. 331–343). Routledge.
66.
ZhangL.J.QinL.T. (2018). Validating a questionnaire on EFL writers’ metacognitive awareness of writing strategies in multimedia environments. In HaukåsÅ.BjørkeC.DypedahlM. (Eds.), Metacognition in language learning and teaching (pp. 156–178). Routledge.
67.
ZhangL.J.SaeedianB.FathiJ. (2022). Testing a model of growth mindset, ideal L2 self, boredom, and WTC in an EFL context. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Epub ahead of print 19July2022. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2022.2100893.
68.
ZhangL.J.ZhangD. (2018). Metacognition in TESOL: Theory and practice. In LiontasJ.ShehadehA. (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopaedia of English language teaching: Volume 2 (pp. 682–792). Wiley.
69.
ZhangD.ZhangL.J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning in second/foreign language teaching. In GaoX. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 883–898). Springer Nature.
70.
ZimmermanB.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.
71.
ZimmermanB.J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48, 135–147.
72.
ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 289–308). Erlbaum.
73.
ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In SchunkD.H.ZimmermanB.J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
