Collaborative writing is a pedagogical activity increasingly used in second language education. Despite the increased research on L2 students’ participation in collaborative writing, scant attention has been paid to student engagement in project-based collaborative writing and the possible engagement changes. This article reports on a longitudinal case study investigating the changes in student engagement of a group of five Chinese EFL undergraduates in project-based collaborative writing. The analysis of the data gathered by observations of group interactions, interviews, and student texts reveals three patterns of engagement changes: from active collaborators to ‘team escapers’, from a supporter to a ‘free rider’, and unchanged dedicated writers. The findings are discussed concerning the factors that could account for the engagement changes, including students’ language proficiency and learning needs as the individual factors and activity type as the contextual factor.
AlghasabM. (2015). Student–student collaboration in wiki mediated collaborative writing activities: Exploring EFL teachers’ roles in the collaborative process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of York, York, UK.
2.
AskhamP. (2008). Context and identity: Exploring adult learners’ experiences of higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 85–97.
3.
AubreyS. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter?Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 59–86.
4.
AzkaraiA.KopinskaM. (2020). Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 94, 102338.
5.
BasterrecheaM.LeeserM.J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28, 97–113.
6.
BloorM.WoodF. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. Sage.
7.
BrintS.CantwellA.M.HannemanR.A. (2008). The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement. Research in Higher Education, 49, 383–402.
8.
CapleH.BogleM. (2013). Making group assessment transparent: What wikis can contribute to collaborative projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 198–210.
9.
ChaoY.J.LoH. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19, 395–411.
10.
ChenW.YuS. (2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83–96.
11.
CortesV. (2019). Considering the importance of L2 learners’ writing needs. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100679.
12.
DaiuteC. (1986). Do 1 and 1 make 2? Patterns of influence by collaborative authors. Written Communication, 3, 383–408.
13.
DaiuteC.DaltonB. (1988). ‘Let’s brighten it up a bit’: Collaboration and cognition in writing. In RafothB.A.RubinD.L. (Eds.), The social construction of written communication (pp. 249–269). Ablex.
14.
DaleH. (1994). Collaborative writing interactions in one ninth-grade classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 334–344.
15.
ElolaI.OskozA. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14, 51–71.
16.
Fernández-DobaoA. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
17.
Fernández-DobaoA. (2020). Collaborative writing in mixed classes: What do heritage and second language learners think?Foreign Language Annals, 53, 48–68.
18.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
19.
HuangL.S. (2010). Seeing eye to eye? The academic writing needs of graduate and undergraduate students from students’ and instructors’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 14, 517–539.
20.
KahuE.R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773.
21.
KesslerG.BikowskiD. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 41–58.
22.
KimY.J.McDonoughK. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15, 183–199.
23.
KopinskaM.AzkaraiA. (2020). Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 607–630.
24.
KowalM.SwainM. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73–93.
25.
KraussJ.BossS. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning: Guiding deeper inquiry. Corwin.
26.
LaurD. (2013). Authentic learning experiences: A real-world approach to project-based learning. Routledge.
27.
Lázaro-IbarrolaA.VillarrealI. (2021). Are EFL writers motivated or demotivated by model texts and task repetition? Evidence from young collaborative writers. International Journal of English Studies, 21, 29–55.
28.
LeeserM.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81.
29.
LiM.KimD. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42.
30.
LiM.ZhuW. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning and Technology, 21, 96–120.
31.
LiuM.LiuL.LiuL. (2018). Group awareness increases student engagement in online collaborative writing. Internet and Higher Education, 38, 1–8.
32.
LlorensS.SchaufeliW.BakkerA.SalanovaM. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841.
33.
LongM.H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In LongM.H. (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–78). Cambridge University Press.
34.
LunsfordA.EdeL. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Southern Illinois University Press.
35.
MatsudaP.K. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 65–83.
36.
McDonoughK. (2004). Learner–learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207–224.
37.
McDonoughK.García FuentesC. (2015). The effect of writing task and task conditions on Colombian EFL learners’ language use. TESL Canada Journal, 32, 67.
38.
MilesM.B.HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
39.
StorchN. (1998). A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52, 29–53.
40.
StorchN. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114.
41.
StorchN. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288.
42.
StorchN. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
43.
StorchN. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52, 40–59.
44.
SusserB. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 31–47.
45.
TanL.L.WigglesworthG.StorchN. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 1–24.
46.
TatzlD.HasslerW.MessnarzB.FlührH. (2012). The development of a project-based collaborative technical writing model founded on learner feedback in a tertiary aeronautical engineering program. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42, 279–304.
47.
VaismoradiM.TurunenH.BondasT. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.
48.
VillarrealI.Gil-SarrateaN. (2020). The effect of collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting. Language Teaching Research, 24, 874–897.
49.
VillarrealI.Munarriz-IbarrolaM. (2021). ‘Together we do better’: The effect of pair and group work on young EFL learners’ written texts and attitudes. In del P. García Mayo, M. (Ed.), Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 89–115). De Gruyter Mouton.
50.
VillarrealI.Bueno-AlastueyM.C.Sáez-LeónR. (2021). Computer-based collaborative writing with young learners: Effects on text quality. In García MayoM.P. (Ed.), Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 177–198). De Gruyter Mouton.
51.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
52.
VygotskyL.S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ.V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144−188). M.E. Sharpe.
53.
WallsL.C. (2018). The effect of dyad type on collaboration: Interactions among heritage and second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 638–657.
54.
WestR. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27, 1–19.
55.
YinR.K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
56.
YinR.K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th edition.Sage.
57.
ZepkeN. (2015). What future for student engagement in neo-liberal times?Higher Education, 69, 693–704.
58.
ZhaiM. (2021). Collaborative writing in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom: Learners’ perceptions and motivations. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100836.
59.
ZhangB. (2021). Engaging in dialogue during collaborative writing: The role of affective, cognitive, and social engagement. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 8November2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211054047.
60.
ZhangM. (2022). A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 26, 10–33.
61.
ZhengY.YuS.LeeI. (2021). Implementing collaborative writing in Chinese EFL classrooms: Voices from tertiary teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631561.
