The present study examines the direct and indirect relationships between classroom environment (CE), L2 (second/foreign language) learner emotions (i.e. enjoyment, anxiety and boredom), and their willingness to communicate (WTC) in classes for English as a foreign language (EFL). Participants were 2,268 university students in China. Pearson correlation analyses showed significant correlations between CE, L2 emotions, and WTC, with effect sizes ranging from small to large. In addition, the three L2 emotions were found to mediate the relationship between CE and WTC in parallel, with enjoyment having the largest mediating effect, followed by anxiety and boredom. The findings offer insights into how to improve students’ WTC in an L2.
BotesE.van der WesthuizenL.DewaeleJ.M.MacIntyreP.GreiffS. (2022). Validating the short-form Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale. Applied Linguistics. Epub ahead of print 20 April 2022. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amac018.
2.
CaoY.PhilpJ. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34, 480–493.
3.
ClémentR.BakerS.C.MacIntyreP.D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 190–209.
4.
ComptonL. (2004). Using text chat to improve willingness to communicate. In SonJ.-B. (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts, and practices (pp. 123–144). iUniverse.
5.
ComptonL. (2007). The impact of content and context on international teaching assistants’ willingness to communicate in the language classroom. TESL-EJ, 10, 1–20.
6.
CsíkszentmihályiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins.
7.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2019) The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behaviour on Willingness to Communicate among English foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 523–535.
8.
DewaeleJ.-M.DewaeleL. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of willingness to communicate in the FL Classroom. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2, 24–37.
9.
DewaeleJ.-M.LiC. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World, 196, 34–49.
10.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237–274.
11.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of the language learner. In MacIntyreP. D.GregersenT.MercerS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Multilingual Matters.
12.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2019). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety. In SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 263–286). Routledge.
13.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2022). ‘You can’t start a fire without a spark’: The emergence of flow in foreign language classrooms. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0123
14.
DewaeleJ.-M.PavelescuL. (2021). The relationship between incommensurable emotions and willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: A multiple case study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15, 66–80.
15.
DewaeleJ.-M.Franco MagdalenaA.SaitoK. (2019). The effect of perception of teacher characteristics on Spanish EFL Learners’ anxiety and enjoyment. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 412–427.
16.
DewaeleJ.-M.WitneyJ.SaitoK.DewaeleL. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety in the FL classroom: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22, 676–697.
17.
DonovanL.A.MacIntyreP.D. (2005). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 21, 420–427.
18.
DormanJ.P.FisherD.L.WaldripB.G. (2006). Classroom environment, students’ perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy and attitude to science: A Lisrel analysis. In DarrellF.SweK.M. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: Worldviews (pp. 1–28). World Scientific.
19.
DormanJ.P.FraserB.J. (2009). Psychosocial environment and affective outcomes in technology-rich classrooms: Testing a causal model. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 77–99.
FraserB.J.TreagustD.F.DennisN.C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education, 11, 43–54.
22.
GoetzT.HallN.C. (2014). Academic boredom. In PekrunR.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 311–330). Routledge.
23.
HamreB.K.PiantaR.C. (2007). Learning opportunities in preschool and early elementary classrooms. In PiantaR.C.CoxM.J.SnowK.L. (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (pp. 49–83). Paul H. Brookes.
24.
HarveyS.T.BimlerD.EvansI.M.KirklandJ.PechtelP. (2012). Mapping the classroom emotional environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 628–640.
25.
HashimotoY. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20, 29–70.
26.
HayesA.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Publications.
27.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
28.
JenningsP.A.GreenbergM.T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525.
29.
JiangY.DewaeleJ.-M. (2019). How unique is the foreign language classroom enjoyment and anxiety of Chinese EFL learners?System, 82, 13–25.
30.
KhajavyG.H.GhonsoolyB.FatemiA.H.ChoiC.W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 154–180.
31.
KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.BarabadiE. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 605–624.
32.
KimY.-J. (2017). Cognitive-interactionist approaches to L2 instruction. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 126–145). Routledge.
33.
KrukM. (2021a). Changes in self-perceived willingness to communicate during visits to Second Life: A case study. The Language Learning Journal, 49, 240–250.
34.
KrukM. (2021b). Investigating dynamic relationships among individual difference variables in learning English as a foreign language in a virtual world. Springer.
35.
KrukM. (2022). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in Second Life: the case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35, 190–216.
36.
KrukM.PawlakM.ZawodniakJ. (2021). Another look at boredom in language instruction: The role of the predictable and the unexpected. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11, 15–40.
37.
LarsonR.W.RichardsM.H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99, 418–433.
38.
LiC. (2021). A control-value theory approach to boredom in english classes among university students in china. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 317–334.
39.
LiC. (2022). Foreign language learning boredom and enjoyment: The effects of learner variables and teacher variables. Language Teaching Research. doi.org/10.1177/13621688221090324.
40.
LiC.DewaeleJ.-M. (2020). The role of trait emotional intelligence and online learning achievement perception on foreign language class boredom among Cchinese university. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 5, 33–44.
41.
LiC.WeiL. (2022). Anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom in language learning amongst junior secondary students in rural China: How do they contribute to L2 achievement?Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Epub ahead of print 8 March 2022. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263122000031.
42.
LiC.DewaeleJ.-M.HuY. (2021). Foreign language learning boredom: Conceptualization and measurement. Applied Linguistics Review. Epub ahead of print 13 March 2021. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2020-0124.
43.
LiC.HuangJ.LiB. (2021). The predictive effects of classroom environment and trait emotional intelligence on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety. System, 96, 102393.
44.
LiC.JiangG.DewaeleJ.-M. (2018). Understanding Chinese high school students’ foreign language enjoyment: Validation of the Chinese version of the foreign language enjoyment scale. System, 76, 183–196.
45.
LiuY.ParkH. (2012). A study of Korean EFL learners’ WTC and motivation. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16, 35–58.
46.
MacIntyreP.D.BakerS.ClémentR.DonovanL.A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589–607.
47.
MacIntyreP.D.CharosC. (1996). Personality, attitudes and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3–26.
48.
MacIntyreP.D.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
49.
MacIntyreP.D.LegattoJ.J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32, 149–171.
50.
McCroskeyJ.C.BaerJ.E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO, USA.
51.
McCroskeyJ.C.RichmondV.P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In McCroskeyJ.C.DalyJ.A. (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129–156). Sage.
52.
MercerS.DörnyeiZ. (2020). Engaging learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
53.
Mystkowska-WiertelakA.PawlakM. (2017). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Multilingual Matters.
54.
NettU.E.GoetzT.HallN.C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 49–59.
55.
PawlakM.Mystkowska-WiertelakA. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1–9.
56.
PawlakM.KrukM.ZawodniakJ. (2021). Individual trajectories of boredom in learning English as a foreign language at the university level: Insights from three students’ self-reported experience. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15, 263–278.
57.
PawlakM.KrukM.ZawodniakJ. (2022). Investigating individual trajectories in experiencing boredom in the language classroom: The case of 11 Polish students of English. Language Teaching Research, 26, 598–616.
58.
PawlakM.KrukM.ZawodniakJ.PasikowskiS. (2020). Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners. System, 91, 1–10.
59.
PawlakM.ZawodniakJ.KrukM. (2020). Boredom in the foreign language classroom: A micro-perspective. Springer International.
60.
PekrunR.GoetzT.DanielsL.M.StupniskyR.H.PerryR.P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531–549.
61.
PekrunR.GoetzT.FrenzelA.C.BarchfeldP.PerryR.P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48.
62.
PengJ. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: Acultural perspective. In LiuJ. (Ed.), English language teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives and standards (pp. 250–269). Continuum.
63.
PengJ.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.
64.
Piechurska-KucielE. (2011). Willingness to communicate in L2 and self-perceived levels of FL skills in Polish adolescents. In ArabskiJ.WojtaszekA. (Eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 235–250). Springer.
65.
PlonskyL.OswaldF.L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
66.
ReyesM.R.BrackettM.A.RiversS.E.WhiteM.SaloveyP. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 700–712.
67.
WeaverC. (2005). Using the Rasch model to develop a measure of second language learners’ willingness to communicate within a language classroom. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 396–415.
68.
WeaverC. (2007). Willingness to communicate: A mediating factor in the interaction between learners and tasks. In Van den BrandenK.Van GorpK.VerhelstM. (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 159–193). Cambridge Scholars Press.
69.
WuC.-P.LinH.-J. (2014). Anxiety about speaking a foreign language as a mediator of the relation between motivation and willingness to communicate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 119, 785–798.
70.
XiaY.XuY. (2018). On the influence of classroom environment on negative academic emotions of English majors. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 3, 65–76.
71.
YashimaT. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66.
72.
ZawodniakJ.KrukM. (2019). Boredom in the English language classroom: An investigation of three language learners. Konin Language Studies, 7, 197–214.
73.
ZawodniakJ.KrukM.ChumasJ. (2017). Towards conceptualizing boredom as an emotion in the EFL academic context. Konin Language Studies, 5, 425–441.
