We investigated the extent to which English learners developed knowledge of pragmatically-appropriate request-making forms through task-based gameplay involving virtual dialogues with fictional professors, employers, and friends on a virtual US campus. The digital game presents players with several scenarios, asking them to select the most appropriate dialogue option given a situation presented in both text and video. Depending on their dialogue choice, one of three videos plays depicting an authentic reaction to the option selected (e.g. happily accepting the request; refusing the request with dismay). Undergraduate students at a Chinese university (n = 105) played the game involving 10 hypothetical request-making scenarios. Two versions of the game were developed. In one version, participants were only given one opportunity to watch a single reaction video while the second version allowed selection of multiple request forms and viewing multiple reaction videos. Regardless of the game version, participants improved their productive knowledge of request-making after playing the game and maintained knowledge at the delayed posttest, even though their receptive knowledge showed no improvement. Higher English proficiency had a positive impact on their immediate gains in productive knowledge, while motivation to learn English had a negative impact on receptive knowledge.
BelzJ.KingingerC. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatics competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53, 591–647.
2.
BrownP.LevinsonS.D. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. 2nd edition.Cambridge University Press.
3.
BygateM.SamudaV. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interaction approach. In MackeyA.PolioC. (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 90–116). Taylor and Francis/Routledge.
4.
BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Longman.
5.
DeKeyserR. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPattenB.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Theories in Second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94–113). Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
DixonD.H. (2022). The linguistic environments of digital games: A discriminant analysis of language use in game mechanics. CALICO Journal, 39(2), 150–171.
7.
DixonD.H.DixonT.JordanE. (2022). Second language (L2) gains through digital game-based language learning (DGBLL): A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 26, 1–25.
8.
DörnyeiZ. (2019). Task motivation: What makes an L2 task engaging? In WenZ.AhmadianM.J. (Eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan (pp. 53–66). John Benjamins.
9.
EgbertJ. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87, 499–518.
10.
EkiertM.LampropoulouS.RévészA.TorgersenE. (2018). The effects of task types and proficiency on discourse appropriacy in oral task performance. In TaguchiN.KimY. (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 247–264). John Benjamins.
11.
EllisR. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.
12.
EslamiR.Z.AhnS.J. (2014). Motivation, amount of interaction, length of residence, and ESL learners’ pragmatic competence. Applied Research on English Language, 3, 9–28.
13.
GardnerR.C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model: Volume 10. Peter Lang.
14.
GassS.BehneyJ.PlonskyL. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. 5th edition.Routledge.
15.
GeranpayehA. (2003). A quick review of the English Quick Placement Test. Research Notes, 12, 8–10.
16.
González-LloretM. (2016). The construction of emotion in multilingual computer-mediated interaction. In PriorM.T.KasperG. (Eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction (pp. 291–313). John Benjamins.
17.
González-LloretM. (2019). Technology and L2 pragmatics learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 113–127.
18.
González-LloretM.OrtegaL. (2018). Pragmatics, tasks, and technology: A synergy. In TaguchiN.KimY. (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 191–216). John Benjamins.
19.
González-LloretM.OrtegaL. (Eds.). (2014). Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. John Benjamins.
20.
KimY. (2009). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 285–325.
21.
KimY.TaguchiN. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom context: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677.
22.
KoS.EslamiZ.R. (2021). Developing pragmatic competence in digital game worlds: A systematic review. TESL-EJ, 25, 1–26.
23.
LevkinaM. (2018). Developing pragmatic competence through tasks in EFL contexts: Does proficiency play a role? In TaguchiN.KimY. (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 137–158). John Benjamins.
24.
LiQ. (2019). L2 Chinese learners’ pragmatic developmental patterns in data-driven instruction and computer-mediated communication (CMC): A case of Chinese sentence final particlene. Applied Pragmatics, 1, 154–183.
25.
LoewenS.CrowtherD., et al. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31, 293–311.
26.
LongM. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.
27.
MayerR.E. (2014). Computer games for learning: An evidence-based approach. MIT Press.
28.
Neary-SundquistC. (2013). Task type effects on pragmatic marker use by learners at varying proficiency levels. L2 Journal, 5, 1–21.
29.
PattonM.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd edition.Sage.
30.
PhilpJ.DuchesneS. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.
31.
PlonskyL.OswaldF. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
32.
PrenskyM. (2007). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.
33.
ReinhardtJ. (2019). Gameful second and foreign language teaching and learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
ReinhardtJ. (2021). Not all MMOs are created equal: A design-informed approach to the stud of L2 learning in multiplayer online games. In PetersonM.YamazakiK.ThomasM. (Eds.), The state of play: Digital games and language learning (pp. 69–87). Bloomsbury.
35.
RobinsonP. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 193–213.
36.
SagdicA. (2022). Learning by simulating: Second language pragmatic development in a technology-mediated task-based simulation with feedback. Unpublished dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
37.
SalenK.ZimmermanE. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
38.
SykesJ.M. (2009). Learner request in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatics acquisition. In LomikaL.LordG. (Eds.), The second generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL (pp. 199–234). CALICO Monograph. CALICO.
39.
SykesJ.M. (2013). Multiuser virtual environments: Apologies in Spanish. In TaguchiN.SykesJ.M. (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 71–100). John Benjamins.
40.
SykesJ.M.DubreilS. (2019). Pragmatics learning in digital games and virtual environments. In TaguchiN. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 387–399). Routledge.
41.
SykesJ.M.ReinhardtJ. (2012). Language at play: Digital games in second and foreign language teaching and learning. Pearson-Prentice Hall.
42.
TaguchiN. (2012). Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. Multilingual Matters.
43.
TaguchiN. (in press). Game-based pragmatics learning: Learning request-making through perlocutionary effects. Language Learning & Technology.
44.
TaguchiN.DixonD. (in press). A comparison of the effectiveness of feedback game mechanics for learning request-making in English. CALICO Journal.
45.
TaguchiN.KimY. (2016). Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatics-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 37, 416–437.
46.
TaguchiN.KimY. (Eds.) (2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. John Benjamins.
47.
TaguchiN.KostromitinaM.WheelerH. (2022). Individual differences in L2 pragmatics. In LiS.HiverP.PapiM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences. Routledge.
48.
TakahashiS. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency?Applied Linguistics, 26, 90–120.
49.
TangX.TaguchiN. (2020). Designing and using a scenario-based digital game to teach Chinese formulaic expressions. CALICO Journal, 37, 1–22.
50.
TangX.TaguchiN. (2021). Digital game-based learning of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese. Modern Language Journal, 105, 740–769.
