Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

When inferring the meaning of unknown words in a second language, learners make use of a variety of cues including the cross-linguistic formal similarities of loanwords and cognates. However, because learners do not always recognize these cross-linguistic relationships, cognate strategy training has been recommended. The present study investigated the impact of cognate strategy training on Japanese speakers’ accuracy when guessing the meaning of unknown English words. The findings revealed that participants were significantly more accurate in responding to cognates after training than prior to it, while responses to noncognates were similar in both rounds. Moreover, participants were more accurate in identifying cognates with common grapheme–phoneme correspondences in English (e.g. fleece) after training than those that had less-common correspondences (e.g. gauge). Considering error rates, the benefit-cost ratio of applying the strategy was four correct guesses to one incorrect guess. Together with insights from a small-scale qualitative follow-up study, the results reveal that both phonological decoding of English words and conversion into katakana script in Japanese contribute to difficulties in noticing cognate relationships. The primary implication of the study is that cognate strategy training may contribute positively to language teaching pedagogy in Japan and other contexts.

Keywords

cognate cross-linguistic similarity Japanese lexical inferencing loanword word guessing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2019a). Cognate frequency and assessment of second language lexical knowledge. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23, 1121–1136.

Allen

(2019b). Cognate frequency predicts accuracy in tests of lexical knowledge. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16, 312–327.

Allen

(2019c). The prevalence and frequency of Japanese–English cognates: Recommendations for future research in applied linguistics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57, 355–376.

Allen

Conklin

(2013). Cross-linguistic similarity and task demands for Japanese–English bilingual processing. PLoS One, 8, e72631.

Allen

Conklin

Miwa

(2021). Cross-linguistic lexical effects in different-script bilingual reading are modulated by task. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25, 168–188.

Bates

DM.

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

. (2021). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (accessed June 2022).

Bensoussan

Laufer

(1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7, 15–32.

Brysbaert

Warriner

A.B.

Kuperman

(2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911.

Carton

(1971). Inferencing: A process in using and learning language. In Pimsleur

Quinn

(Eds.), The psychology of second language learning (pp. 45–58). Cambridge University Press.

10.

Chern

C.L.

(1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. In Huckin

Haynes

Coady

(Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 67–85). Ablex.

11.

Comer

W.J.

(2012). Lexical inferencing in reading L2 Russian. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24, 209–230.

12.

Daulton

F.E.

(2008). Japan’s built-in lexicon of English-based loanwords. Multilingual Matters.

13.

Davies

(2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca (accessed June 2022).

14.

de Bot

Paribakht

Wesche

. (1997). Toward a lexical processing model for the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 309–329.

15.

Dressler

Carlo

M.S.

Snow

C.E.

August

White

C.E.

(2011). Spanish-speaking students’ use of cognate knowledge to infer the meaning of English words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 243–255.

16.

Fraser

C.A.

(1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 225–241.

17.

Granger

(1993). Cognates: An aid or a barrier to successful L2 vocabulary development. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 99–100, 43–56.

18.

Haastrup

(2008). Lexical inferencing procedures in two languages. In Albrechtsen

Haastrup

Henriksen

(Eds.), Vocabulary and writing in a first and second language: Processes and development (pp. 66–111). Palgrave Macmillan.

19.

Harris

(2019). Issues related to the presence of Japanese loanwords of English origin in vocabulary size tests. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 1–13. Available at: https://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/view/568 (accessed June 2022).

20.

Haynes

(1984). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In Handscombe

Orem

R.A.

Taylor

B.P.

(Eds.), On TESOL ’83 (pp. 163–176). TESOL.

21.

Helms-Park

Perhan

(2016). The role of explicit instruction in cross-script cognate recognition: The case of Ukrainian-speaking EAP learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 17–33.

22.

Holmes

Ramos

R.G.

(1993). False friends and reckless guessers: Observing cognate recognition strategies. In Huckin

Haynes

Coady

(Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 86–108). Ablex.

23.

Horst

White

Bell

(2010). First and second language knowledge in the language classroom. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(3), 331–349.

24.

H.C.M.

Nassaji

(2014). Lexical inferencing strategies: The case of successful versus less successful inferencers. System, 45, 27–38.

25.

Irwin

(2011). Loanwords in Japanese. John Benjamins.

26.

Kobayashi

(2012). Effects of L1 on L2 lexical inferencing. Tenri University Journal, 64, 15–32.

27.

Kvale

Brinkmann

(2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd edition. Sage.

28.

Miwa

Dijkstra

Bolger

Baayen

(2014). Reading English with Japanese in mind: Effects of frequency, phonology, and meaning in different-script bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 445–463.

29.

Moran

(1991). Lexical inferencing in EFL reading coursebooks: Some implications of research. System, 19, 389–400.

30.

Moss

(1992). Cognate recognition: Its importance in the teaching of ESP reading courses to Spanish speakers. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 141–158.

31.

Molnar

(2010). Cognate recognition and L3 vocabulary acquisition. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 2, 337–349. Available at: http://www.acta.sapientia.ro/acta-philo/C2-2/philo22-11.pdf (accessed June 2022).

32.

Nassaji

(2003). L2 vocabulary learning from context: strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 645–670.

33.

National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. (2013). BCCWJ word list. Available at: https://clrd.ninjal.ac.jp/bccwj/en/freq-list.html (accessed June 2022).

34.

Odlin

(1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press.

35.

Otwinowska-Kasztelanic

(2009). Raising awareness of cognate vocabulary as a strategy in teaching English to Polish adults. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 131–147.

36.

Palmberg

(1987). On lexical inferencing and the young foreign-language learner. System, 15, 69–76.

37.

Palmberg

(1988). On lexical inferencing and language distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 207–214.

38.

Paribakht

T.S.

(2005). The influence of first language lexicalisation on second language lexical inferencing: A study of Farsi-speaking learners of English as a foreign language. Language Learning, 55, 701–48.

39.

Paribakht

T.S.

Wesche

M.B.

(1999). Reading and ‘incidental’ L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 195–221.

40.

Ringbom

(2007). Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.

41.

Seibert

L.C.

(1945). A study of the practice of guessing word meanings from a context. Modern Language Journal, 29, 296–323.

42.

Uchida

(2007). Oral and written identification of L2 loanword cognates by initial Japanese learners of English. The Language Teacher, 31, 19–22. Available at: https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf/the_language_teacher/09_2007tlt.pdf (accessed June 2022).

43.

Wesche

M.B.

Paribakht

T.S.

(2010). Lexical inferencing in a first and second language: Cross-linguistic dimensions. Multilingual Matters.

44.

White

J.L.

Horst

(2012). Cognate awareness-raising in late childhood: Teachable and useful. Language Awareness, 21, 181–196.

45.

Yoshioka

(2019). Japanese L1 cognate knowledge use in English lexical inferencing. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

The impact of cognate strategy training on guessing accuracy for unknown visually-presented words: The case of Japanese learners of English

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material