This article discusses, from a sociocognitive perspective, the integration of usage-based linguistics (UBL) models in favor of conversation analysis (CA) for second language acquisition (SLA). On this basis, it presents a pedagogical approach, viz. role-based interaction analysis (RBIA) for foreign language learning (FLL), by scaffolding, tracking and measuring learners’ behaviors of learning spoken grammatical and pragmatic features in intertextual affordances. Two groups were designated randomly as the experimental group (n = 30) and the comparison group (n = 32) to examine their uptake of the targeted features via explicit and implicit RBIA (i.e. two different ways of learning/processing in role-based interaction) respectively. Results showed: (1) there were significant differences between the two groups in the learning of grammatical features; (2) intergroup differences were significant in the development of pragmatic features; (3) the explicit RBIA learners outperformed the implicit RBIA learners in the appropriacy of expressing pragmatic meanings of social roles. These findings provide evidence for the integrated UBL model and the plausibility of the RBIA-for-FLL approach in instructed FLL contexts.
AmentJ.VidalC.P.ParesJ.B. (2018). The effects of English-medium instruction on the use of textual and interpersonal pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 28, 517–545.
2.
AndringaS.GlopperK.HacquebordH. (2011). Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language Learning, 1, 1–36.
3.
AtkinsonD. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 599–622.
4.
BarsalouL. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
5.
BehrensH. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47, 383–411.
6.
BoxerD.CohenA.D. (2004/2007). Studying speaking to inform second language learning. World Publishing Company.
7.
BrownH.D. (1991). Breaking the language barrier. Intercultural Press.
8.
BybeeJ. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 8, 711–733.
9.
CarterR.McCarthyM. (1997). Exploring spoken English. Cambridge University Press.
10.
ClarkE.V. (2018). Conversation and language acquisition: A pragmatic approach. Language Learning and Development, 14, 170–185.
11.
ClarkA.ChalmersD. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.
12.
DabrowskaE.DivjakD. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of cognitive linguistics. Mouton DeGruyter.
13.
DescartesR. (1637/1960). Discourse on method and meditations. Bobbs-Merrill.
14.
DikjstraK.KaschakM.ZwaanR. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102, 139–149.
15.
DoughtyC.WilliamsJ.1998. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge University Press.
16.
EgginsS. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. 2nd edition.Continuum.
EllisN.C. (1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit in and out of explicit cognitive mediation. In EllisN.C. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211–282). Academic Press.
19.
EllisN.C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: Word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In SchmittN.McCarthyM. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 122–139). Cambridge University Press.
20.
EllisN.C. (2016). Frequency in language learning and language change. In BehrensH.PfänderS. (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language (pp. 239–256). De Gruyter.
21.
EllisN.C.O’DonnellM.B.RömerU. (2013). Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63, 25–51.
22.
EllisN.C.RömerU.O’DonnellM.B. (2016). Constructions and usage-based approaches to language acquisition. Language Learning, 66, 23–44.
23.
EllisR. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
24.
EllisR. (2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.
25.
EvansV. (2009). How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction. Oxford University Press.
FukutaJ.YamashitaJ. (2021). The complex relationship between conscious/unconscious learning and conscious/unconscious knowledge: The mediating effects of salience in form–meaning connections. Second Language Research. Epub ahead of print 15September2021. DOI: 10.1177/02676583211044950.
28.
FungL.CarterR. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28, 410–439.
29.
GassS. (1998). Apples and oranges: Or, why apples are not orange and don’t need to be: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 82, 83–90.
30.
HallJ.K. (2004). Language learning as an interactional event. Modern Language Journal, 88, 607–611.
31.
HallidayM.A.K. (1985/1989). Part A. In HallidayM.A.K.HasanR. (Eds.), Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.
32.
HallidayM.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116.
33.
HallidayM.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
34.
HallidayM.A.K. (2002/2007). Linguistic studies of text and discourse. Edited by WebsterJ.J.Peking University Press.
35.
HamaM.LeowR.P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisited: Extending Williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465–491.
36.
HauserE. (2011). On the danger of exogenous theory in CA-for-SLA: A response to Hellermann and Cole (2009). Applied Linguistics, 32, 348–352.
37.
HellermannJ.ColeE. (2008). Practices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom: Disengagements from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30, 186–215.
38.
KasperG. (1997). ‘A’ stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81, 307–312.
39.
KasperG. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88, 551–567.
40.
KrashenS.D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
41.
LangackerR.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
42.
LeowR.P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584.
43.
LongM. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81, 318–323.
44.
MagaliacaneA.HowardM. (2019). The role of learner status in the acquisition of pragmatic markers during study abroad: The use of ‘like’ in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 72–86.
45.
MarkeeN. (2000). Conversation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
MarkeeN. (2008). Towards a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404–427.
47.
MartinJ.R. (1993). Genre and literacy: Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141–172.
48.
MartinJ.R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21.
49.
MatthiessenC.M.I.M. (2009). Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Language Learning, 59, 206–229.
50.
ParkE.S. (2011). Learner-generated noticing of written L2 input: What do learners notice and why?Language Learning, 61, 146–186.
51.
PolatB. (2011). Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3745–3756.
52.
RottS. (2007). The effect of frequency of input enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57, 165–199.
53.
SaikalukP.PexmanP.AguileraL.OwenW.SearsC. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443.
54.
SchegloffE.A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In OchsE.SchegloffE.A.ThompsonS. (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133) Cambridge University Press.
55.
SchegloffE.A.KoshikI.OlsherD.JacobyS. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3–31.
56.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
57.
SchmidtR. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.
58.
SkehanP. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
59.
SwainM.LapkinS. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391.
60.
The British National Curriculum. (2004). Introducing the grammar of talk. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
61.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
62.
TomaselloM. (2008). Origins of human communication. MIT Press.
63.
TrousdaleG.HoffmannT. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford University Press.
TylerA. (2010). Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270–291.
66.
VygotskyL.S. (1935/1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
67.
VygotskyL.S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
68.
WellsG. (1994). The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a ‘language-based theory of learning’. Linguistics and Education, 6, 41–90.
69.
WenQ.F. (2018). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51, 526–540.
70.
WilliamsJ.N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.
71.
XiaoH.Z. (2012). The role of sequenced interactional strata and frequencies in constructing L2 discourse domain: Sound–meaning mapping prioritizing hypothesis. Foreign Languages in China, 9, 57–64.
72.
XiaoH.Z.DaiC.Y.DongL.Z. (2021). The development of interlanguage pragmatic markers in alignment with role relationships. Pragmatics, 31, 617–646.
