Within the same learning context, learners’ outcomes in terms of oral fluency vary greatly. This study tracked the relative contributions that first language (L1) and initial second language (L2) fluency skill and working memory (WM) made to L2 fluency development. We assessed the performance of French-speaking Grade 6 learners’ (n = 47, mean age: 11) in a 10-month intensive English program in Quebec, Canada using a picture-cue monologic task based on The Suitcase Story and a semi-structured interview based on the Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI). Working memory was assessed using a backward digit span task and phonological memory (PM) via non-word repetition and serial non-word recognition tasks. Overall, results suggest that L1 fluency, WM and PM played only a minor role in learners’ L2 fluency outcomes, whereas learners’ pre-program levels of L2 fluency constituted an important predictor of L2 fluency development regardless of the speech task used to index fluency.
AbdallahF. (2010). The role of phonological memory in L2 acquisition in adults at different proficiency levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UniversitéLaval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
2.
ACTFL. (2012). Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI): Language Testing International.
3.
AdamsA.M.GathercoleS. (1995). Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 403–414.
4.
AdamsA.M.GathercoleS. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 95–116.
BaddeleyA. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
7.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.
8.
BaddeleyA. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
9.
BaddeleyA.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG.H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory:Volume 8 (pp. 47–89). Academic Press.
10.
BaddeleyA.GathercoleS.E.PapagnoC. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.
11.
BirdsongD. (2005). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In KrollJ.F.DeGrootA.M.B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 109–127). Oxford University Press.
12.
BirdsongD. (2006). Dominance, proficiency, and second language grammatical processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 46–49.
13.
BirdsongD. (2009). Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In BhatiaW.R.T. (Ed.), The new handbook of second language acquisition. Elsevier.
14.
BirdsongD. (2014). Dominance and age in bilingualism. Applied Linguistics, 35, 374–392.
15.
BoskerH.R.PingetA.-F.QuenéH.SandersT.de JongN.H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30, 159–175.
BrooksP.J.KempeV.SionovA. (2006). The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphologyApplied Psycholinguistics, 27, 185–209.
18.
ChambersF. (1997). What do we mean by fluency?System, 25, 535–544.
19.
CheungH. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 3, 867–873.
20.
CollinsL.WhiteJ. (2011). An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 107–133.
21.
CollinsL.WhiteJ. (2012). Closing the gap: Intensity and proficiency. In MunozC. (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 45–65). Multilingual Matters.
22.
CollinsL.LightbownP.M.HalterR.H.SpadaN.M. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 655–680.
23.
ConoverW.J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc
24.
CowanN. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford University Press.
25.
CucchiariniC.StrikH.BovesL. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 989–999.
26.
CucchiariniC.StrikH.BovesL. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between reading and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2862–2873.
27.
CumminsJ. (2001). The entry and exit fallacy in bilingual education. In BakerC.HornbergerN. H. (Eds.), An introductory Reader to the Writings of Jim Cummins (pp. 110–138). Multilingual Matters
28.
CumminsJ.SwainM. (1986). Bilingualism in Education. Longman Press
29.
De JongN.H.MoraJ.C. (2017). Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 227–239.
30.
De JongN.H.WempeT. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 385–390.
31.
De JongN.H.GroenhoutR.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ.H. (2015). Second language fluency: speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 223–243.
32.
DekeyserR. (2007). Study abroad as foreign language practice. In DekeyserR. (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press
33.
DekeyserR. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPattenB.WilliamJ. N. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp. 94–112). Routledge
34.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J.ThomsonR.I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, 359–380.
35.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J.ThomsonR.I.RossiterM.J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.
36.
DerwingT.M.RossiterM.J.MunroJ.M.ThomsonR.I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.
37.
Duran-KaraozZ.TavakoliP. (2020). Predicting L2 fluency from L1 fluency behavior: The case of L1 Turkish and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 671–695.
38.
EllisN.C. (2001). Memory for language. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge University Press.
39.
EllisN. C.FerreiraJ. F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370–385
40.
EngleR.W.TuholskiS.W.LaughlinJ.E.ConwayA.R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.
41.
ErlamR. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9, 147–171.
42.
FortierV.SimardD.FrenchL.M. (2012). La mesure de la mémoire phonologique auprès d’une population d’enfants linguistiquement hétérogène [Measuring phonological memory in a linguistically heterogeneous population of children]. Canadian Modern Language Review / Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 68, 291–315.
43.
FortkampM.B.P. (1998). Measures of working memory capacity and L2 oral fluency. Ilha do Desterro, 35, 201–238.
44.
FortkampM.B.P. (1999). Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech productionCommunication and Cognition, 32, 259–296.
45.
FortkampM.B.P. (2000). Working memory capacity and L2 speech production: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
46.
FosterP. (2020). Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching, 53, 446–461.
47.
FrenchL.M.O’BrienI. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463–487.
48.
FrenchL.M.GagnéN.CollinsL. (2020). Long-term effects of intensive instruction on fluency, comprehensibility and accentedness. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6, 380–401.
49.
GathercoleS. E.BaddeleyA. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 200–213
50.
GathercoleS.E.BaddeleyA. (2014). Working memory and language. Psychology Press.
51.
GathercoleS.E.FrankishC.R.PickeringJ.B.PeakerS.M. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 84–95.
52.
GathercoleS.E.PickeringS.J.HallM.PeakerS.M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54, 1–30.
53.
GathercoleS.E.TiffanyC.BriscoeJ.ThornA.S.C., &ALSPAC Team (2005). Developmental consequences of poor phonological short-term memory function in childhood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 598–611.
54.
GathercoleS.E.WillisC.S.EmslieH.BaddeleyA. (1991). The influences of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children’s repetition of nonwords. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 349–367.
55.
GeorgiadouE.Roehr-BrackinK. (2017). Investigating executive working memory and phonological short-term memory in relation to fluency and self-repair behavior in L2 speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 877–895.
56.
GilabertR.MuñozC. (2010). Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 19–42.
57.
Goldman EislerF. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. University of Michigan
58.
HiltonH. (2008a). Connaissances, procédures et production orale en L2 [Knowledge, procedures and oral production in L2]. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 27, 63–89.
59.
HiltonH. (2008b). The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36, 153–166.
60.
HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance et and proficiency: complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
61.
HuenschA.Tracy-VenturaN. (2017). Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 755–785.
62.
HulmeC.MaughanS.BrownJ.D. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 685–701.
63.
HulstijnJ.H.BossersB. (1992). Individual differences in L2 proficiency as a function of L1 proficiency. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 341–353.
64.
HummelK.M. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 225–249.
65.
HummelK.M.FrenchL.M. (2016). Phonological memory and aptitude components: Contributions to second language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 249–255.
66.
JuffsA.HarringtonM. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.
67.
KierasD.E.MeyerD.E.MuellerS.SeymourT. (1999). Insights into working memory from the perspective of the EPIC architecture for modeling skilled perceptual-motor and cognitive human performance. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 183–223). Cambridge University Press.
68.
KormosJ. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Routledge.
69.
KormosJ.SáfárA. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271.
70.
KormosJ.TrebitsA. (2012). The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62, 439–472.
71.
KudoM.Lee SwansonH. (2014). Are there advantages for additive bilinguals in working memory tasks?Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 96–102.
72.
LennonP. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417.
73.
LightbownP.M. (2001). L2 instruction: Time to teach. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 598–599.
74.
LightbownP.M. (2003). SLA research in the classroom/SLA research for the classroom. Language Learning Journal, 28, 4–13.
75.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN.M. (1991). Étude des effets à long terme de l’apprentissage intensif de l’anglais, langue seconde, au primaire [Study of the long-term effects of intensive learning of English as a second language in elementary school]. Canadian Modern Language Review / Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 48, 90–117.
76.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN.M. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL students in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 563–579.
77.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN.M. (1997). Learning English as a second language in a special school in Quebec. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 315–355.
78.
LinckJ.A.OsthusP.KoethJ.T.BuntingM.F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 861–883.
79.
LordG. (2006). Defining the indefinable: Study abroad and phonological memory abilities. In KleeC.A.FaceT.L. (Eds.) Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 40–46). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
80.
MackeyA.AdamsR.StaffordC.WinkeP. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60(3), 501–533
81.
MariniA.EliseevaN.FabbroF. (2019). Impact of early second-language acquisition on the development of first language and verbal short-term and working memory. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 165–176. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2016.1238865
82.
MasouraV.M.GathercoleS.E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383–388.
83.
MizeraG.J. (2006). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
84.
MuñozC.SingletonD. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0261444810000327
85.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285–310
86.
MunroM.J.DerwingT.M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285–310.
87.
NeilsonK.B. (2014). Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity?Language testing Research, 18, 272–293.
88.
O’BrienI.SegalowitzN.CollentineJ.FreedB. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377–402.
89.
O’BrienI.SegalowitzN.FreedB.CollentineJ. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–581.
90.
PeltonenP. (2018). Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 676–692.
91.
PonceletM.Van der LindenM. (2003). L’évaluation du stock phonologique de la mémoire de travail: élaboration d’une épreuve de répétition de non-mots pour population francophone [Evaluation of the phonological stock of working memory: Development of a non-word repetition test for the French-speaking population]. Revue de neuropsychologie, 13, 377–407.
92.
PréfontaineY.KormosJ. (2015). The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. Modern Language Journal, 99, 96–112.
93.
RiazantsevaA. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing : a study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(04), 497–526. doi: 10.1017/S027226310100403X
94.
RiggenbachH. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14, 423–441.
95.
RobinsonP. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.
96.
SegalowitzN. (2010). The cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.
97.
SegalowitzN. (2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54, 79–95.
98.
SegalowitzN.FreedB. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(02), 173–199
99.
SegalowitzN.FrenchL.M.GuayJ.D.CallahanM. (2014). A la recherche des caractéristiques critiques de l’aisance à l’oral en français langue seconde [In search of the critical features of oral fluency in French as a second language]. Unpublished paper presented at the ‘Les perspectives actuelles sur le développement de la compétence à l’oral en français langue seconde’, annual meeting of the Association francophone pour le savoir (ACFAS), Montréal, QC.
100.
SegalowitzN.HulstijnJ. H. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In KrollJ. A.GrootDe (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371-388). Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press
101.
ShapiroS. S.WilkM. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52((3/4)), 591–611
102.
SkehanP.FosterP.ShumS. (2016). Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54, 97–111.
SpecialeG.EllisN.C.BywaterT. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293–321.
105.
SuzukiY.DekeyserR. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–790.
106.
TowellR.DewaeleJ.-M. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. In DewaeleJ.-M. (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 210–239). Multilingual Matters.
107.
TowellR.HawkinsR.BazerguiN. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84–119.
108.
TrebitsA.KormosJ. (2008). Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. Unpublished paper presented at the 33rd international LAUD symposium, Essen, Germany.
109.
VallarG.BaddeleyA.D. (1984a). Fractionation of working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for a phonological short-term store. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 151–162.
110.
VallarG.BaddeleyA.D. (1984b). Phonological short-term store, phonological processing and sentence comprehension: A neuropsychological case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 121–141.
111.
Valls-FerrerM.MoraJ.C. (2014). L2 fluency development in formal instruction and study abroad. In Pérez-VidalC. (Ed.) Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts, (pp. 111–136). John Benjamins.
112.
VulchanovaM.FoynC.H.NilsenR.A.SigmundssonH. (2014). Links between phonological memory, first language competence and second language competence in 10-year-old children. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 87–95.
113.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – 4th Edition (WISC-IV). Harcourt Assessment.
114.
WhiteJ.L.TurnerC.E. (2005). Comparing children’s oral ability in two ESL programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 491–517.
115.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838
116.
ZabihiR.GhominejadS.Javad AhmadianM. (2021). Can willingness to communicate, communication in English anxiety, behavioural inhibition and behavioural action predict perceived l2 fluency?Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 20September2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211044071.
117.
ZhangG.SimonH.A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and the acoustic loop hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 13, 93–201.
