Research in language learning indicates that process drama (PD), an educational approach where students and teachers work in and out of role to explore themes and issues, can be well suited to the Japanese higher education (HE) context. Despite the benefits highlighted in the literature, PD remains a niche approach to language teaching and learning, with a limited number of practitioners in Japan. This study seeks to uncover language teachers’ experiences of becoming Process Drama Practitioners (PDPs) and using and sharing PD as an English language teaching approach in Japanese HE. Data were collected via in-depth interviews with six experienced PDPs. The findings indicate that prior positive experiences with drama was an encouraging factor of the adoption and self-directed initial use of PD in their teaching practices. Positive student outcomes and feedback were primary motivators for continued use of PD. Experiences of sharing PD led to a perceived need to distinguish PD from theatre-based approaches and establish connections to familiar approaches to language teaching.
AdamsJ.OwensA. (2016). Creativity and democracy in education: Practices and politics of learning through the arts. Routledge.
2.
Araki-MetcalfeN. (2007). Introducing creative language learning in Japan through educational drama. N J Drama Australia Journal, 31, 45–57.
3.
BowellP.HeapB. (2010). Drama is not a dirty word: Past achievements, present concerns, alternative futures. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 15(4), 579–592.
4.
BowellP.HeapB.S. (2013). Planning process drama: Enriching teaching and learning. (2nd ed.). Routledge.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
7.
BrownN.StockmanT. (2013). Examining the use of thematic analysis as a tool for informing design of new family communication technologies. In LoveS.HoneK.McEwanT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (pp. 1–6). British Computer Society.
8.
BundyP.PiazzoliE.DunnJ. (2015). Sociocultural theory, process drama and second language learning. In DavisS.FerholtB.ClemsonH.G.JanssonS.Marjanovic-ShaneA. (Eds.), Dramatic interactions in education: Vygotskian and sociocultural approaches to drama, education, and research (pp. 152–168). Bloomsbury Academic.
9.
ChoiD.S-Y.MorrisonP. (2014). Learning to get it right: Understanding change processes in professional development for teachers of English learners. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 416–435.
10.
CrantonP. (2016). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide to theory and practice. Stylus.
11.
DeenyP.JohnsonA.BooreJ.LeydenC.McCaughanE. (2001). Drama as an experiential technique in learning how to cope with dying patients and their families. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 99–112.
12.
DonneryE. (2010). Deconstructing the bully and victim dichotomy: Process drama in the Japanese EFL university classroom. Scenario, IV(2(2010)), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.4.2.3
13.
DonneryE. (2013). Jo-Ha-Kyu: Enticement–crux–consolidation. From study to learning: Process drama projects in the Japanese English language university classroom. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Available at: https://cora.ucc.ie/handle/10468/1084 (accessed November 2021).
14.
FeredayJ.Muir-Cochran (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
15.
HosokiY. (2011). English language education in Japan: Transitions and challenges (I). Kyushuu Kokusai Daigaku Kankei Gakuronshu (Kyushu International University Academic Journal Collection), 6, 199–215.
16.
HulseB.OwensA. (2017). Process drama as a tool for teaching modern languages: Supporting the development of creativity and innovation in early professional practice. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 17–30.
17.
KaoS.-M.O’NeillC. (1998). Words into worlds: Learning a second language through process drama. Ablex.
18.
KikuchiK.SakaiH. (2009). Japanese learners’ demotivation to study English: A survey study. JALT Journal, 31(2), 183–204.
19.
LiuJ. (2002). Process drama in second- and foreign-language classrooms. In BrauerG. (Ed.), Body and language: Intercultural learning through drama (pp. 51–70). Ablex.
20.
MaleyA.DuffA. (1978). Drama techniques in language learning: A resource book of communication activities for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
21.
MarschkeR. (2005). Creating context, characters and communications: Foreign language teaching and process drama. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Available at: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16104 (accessed November 2021).
22.
Mero-JaffeI. (2011). ‘Is that what I said?’ Interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 231–247.
23.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997, 5–12.
24.
MezirowJ.TaylorE.W. (2009). Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education. Jossey-Bass.
25.
NagatomoD.H. (2012). Exploring Japanese university English teachers’ professional identity. Multilingual Matters.
26.
O’NeillC. (1995). Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Heinemann.
27.
OrmstonR.SpencerL.BarnardM.SnapeD. (2013). The foundations of qualitative research. In RitchieJ.LewisJ.NichollsC.OrmstonR. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 1–25). Sage.
28.
PiazzoliE. (2011). Process drama: The use of affective space to reduce language anxiety in the additional language learning classroom. Research in Drama Education, The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 16(4), 557–573.
29.
PiazzoliE. (2016). Mapping an ethnography of change in teachers of Italian (L2) learning process drama. Teaching Italian Language and Culture Annuals (TILCA), 2016, 96–114.
30.
PiazzoliE. (2018). Embodying language in action: The artistry of process drama in second language education. Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
SakuiK. (2004). Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. ELT Journal, 58(2), 155–163.
32.
ScheweM. (2013). Taking stock and looking ahead: Drama pedagogy as a gateway to a performative teaching and learning culture. Scenario, VII(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.7.1.2
33.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
34.
StinsonM. (2009). ‘Drama is like reversing everything’: Intervention research as teacher professional development. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 14(2), 225–243.
35.
ToL.W.D.ChanY.-L.P.LamY.K.TsangS.-K.Y. (2011). Reflections on a primary school teacher professional development programme on learning English through process drama. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 16(4), 517–539.
Van ManenM. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
38.
YoshidaK. (2003). Education policy in Japan: The problem of espoused objectives versus practice. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 290–292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1193041
