This article explores intersections between two subfields of second language acquisition research: learner psychology (LP) and instructed second language acquisition (ISLA). Despite the common goal of discovering second language (L2) learning processes and products, the two inquiries have taken distinct paths. We argue that it is necessary to unite the knowledge and methods in the two inquiries, in order to answer theoretical and practical questions pertaining to classroom L2 teaching and learning. We make the case that the L2 classroom may be an ideal venue to explore the intersections of the two fields. Three intersections will be discussed. First, research can address the relationship between LP and interactional behaviors during classroom activities that have been investigated in ISLA research. Second, the roles of teachers, the classroom environment, and instruction – the primary variables in ISLA research – can be examined in relation to LP in the classroom. Third, research can target LP as a dependent variable in experimental designs that ISLA research often employs. LP is a primary concern of L2 teachers who face a range of LP (unmotivated students, silent students, anxious students, etc.). Some teachers are also concerned about the potential negative impact of a certain instructional technique on LP. Thus, combining LP and ISLA perspectives helps answer various pedagogical concerns, whether these are related to particular LP issues, or the impact of instructional techniques on LP. Throughout the article, we propose future research topics and make pedagogical recommendations addressing LP in the classroom.
AhmadianM.J. (2020). Explicit and implicit instruction of refusal strategies: Does working memory capacity play a role?Language Teaching Research, 24, 163–188.
2.
AubreyS. (2017). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21, 717–734.
3.
BuiG.KongA. (2019). Metacognitive instruction for peer review interaction in L2 writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11, 357–392.
4.
CaoY. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789–814.
5.
CaoY.PhilpJ. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34, 480–493.
6.
CsizérK. (2017). Motivation in the L2 classroom. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 418–432). Routledge.
7.
CsizérK. (2019). The language learning experiences and their perceived impact on teaching: An interview study with English teachers in Hungary. In SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 314–330). Routledge.
8.
CsizérK. (2020). Second language motivation research in a European context: The case of Hungary. Springer Nature.
9.
CsizérK.AlbertÁ. (in press). Trait and state perspectives of individual difference research. In MercerS.GregersenT. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of psychology of language learning. Routledge.
10.
CsizérK.SimonD. (in press). Surveys. In LiS.HiverP.PapiM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge.
11.
CsizérK.TankóG. (2015). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38, 386–404.
12.
de BoerH.DonkerA.S.KostonsD.D.van der WerfG.P. (2018). Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 98–115.
13.
DaoP.SatoM. (2021). Exploring fluctuations in the relationship between learners’ positive emotional engagement and their interactional behaviours. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print September 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211044238.
14.
DeKeyserR. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62, 189–200.
15.
DeKeyserR.Prieto BotanaG. (2019a). Current research on instructed second language learning: A bird’s eye view. In DeKeyserR.Prieto BotanaG. (Eds.), Doing SLA research with implications for the classroom: Reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability (pp. 1–7). John Benjamins.
16.
DeKeyserR.Prieto BotanaG. (Eds.). (2019b). Doing SLA research with implications for the classroom: Reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability. John Benjamins.
17.
DeKeyserR.M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514.
18.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2017). Psychological dimensions and foreign language anxiety. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 433–450). Routledge.
19.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2019). The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among English foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 523–535.
20.
DewaeleJ.-M.LiC. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 13 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211014538.
21.
DewaeleJ.-M.ChenX.PadillaA.M.LakeJ. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign/second language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2128.
22.
DörnyeiZ. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
23.
DörnyeiZ. (2019). Psychology and language learning: The past, the present and the future. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 1, 27–41.
24.
DörnyeiZ.CsizérK. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2, 203–229.
25.
DörnyeiZ.KormosJ. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300.
26.
DörnyeiZ.KubanyiovaM. (2014). Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
27.
DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
28.
DörnyeiZ.HenryA.MuirC. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. Routledge.
29.
DweckC. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
30.
GkonouC.DewaeleJ.-M.KingJ. (2020). The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
31.
GohC. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39, 188–213.
32.
GuilloteauxM.J.DörnyeiZ. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 55–77.
33.
HanZ.NassajiH. (2019). Introduction: A snapshot of thirty-five years of instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 23, 393–402.
34.
HenryA.SundqvistP.ThorsenC. (2019). Motivational practice: Insights from the classroom. Studentlitteratur.
35.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
36.
IbrahimZ. (2019). Sustained flow: Affective obsession in second language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2963.
37.
KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.BarabadiE. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 605–624.
38.
KormosJ.DörnyeiZ. (2004). The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 9, 1–19.
39.
KormosJ.PréfontaineY. (2017). Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks. Language Teaching Research, 21, 699–716.
40.
KormosJ.WilbyJ. (2020). Task Motivation. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 267–286). Springer.
41.
KubanyiovaM.FeryokA. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 435–449.
42.
LiS.EllisR.ZhuY. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 693–722.
43.
LiS.HiverP.PapiM. (Eds.). (in press). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge.
44.
LoewenS. (2020). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. 2nd edition.Routledge.
45.
LoewenS.SatoM. (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): An overview. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
46.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33.
47.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, 102126.
48.
MacIntyreP. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 111–131.
49.
MacIntyreP.D.WangL. (2021). Willingness to communicate in the L2 about meaningful photos: Application of the pyramid model of WTC. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 4 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211004645.
50.
MacIntyreP.D.GregersenT.MercerS. (2019). Setting an agenda for positive psychology in SLA: Theory, practice, and research. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 262–274.
51.
MacIntyreP.D.DörnyeiZ.ClémentR.NoelsK.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
52.
MacIntyreP.D.RossJ.TalbotK., et al. (2019). Stressors, personality and wellbeing among language teachers. System, 82, 26–38.
53.
MackayJ. (2019). An ideal second language self intervention: Development of possible selves in an English as a foreign language classroom context. System, 81, 50–62.
54.
MagidM.ChanL. (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualise their Ideal L2 Self: Lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 113–125.
55.
MercerS. (2018). Psychology for language learning: Spare a thought for the teacher. Language Teaching, 51, 505–525.
56.
MercerS.RyanS. (2010). A mindset for EFL: Learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal, 64, 436–444.
57.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
58.
MunezaneY. (2013). Motivation, ideal L2 self and valuing of global English. In AppleM.SilvaD.D.FellnerT. (Eds.), Language learning motivation in Japan (pp. 152–168). Multilingual Matters.
59.
MunezaneY. (2015). Enhancing willingness to communicate: Relative effects of visualization and goal setting. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 175–191.
60.
Mystkowska-WiertelakA.PawlakM. (2017). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Multilingual Matters.
61.
OngJ. (2014). How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers?Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 17–30.
62.
PapiM. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467–479.
63.
PapiM.AbdollahzadehE. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning, 62, 571–594.
64.
PapiM.WolffD.NakatsukasaK.BellwoarE. (2021). Motivational factors underlying learner preferences for corrective feedback: Language mindsets and achievement goals. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 12 June 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211018808.
65.
PawlakM. (2012). The dynamic nature of motivation in language learning: A classroom perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 249–278.
66.
PengJ.-E. (2020). Teacher interaction strategies and situated willingness to communicate. ELT Journal, 74, 307–317.
67.
PengJ.-E.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.
68.
PouporeG. (2016). Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2 learners’ task motivation and language production. Language Teaching Research, 20, 719–740.
69.
RassaeiE. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98–109.
70.
ReeveJ. (2015). Understanding motivation and emotion. 6th edition.Wiley.
71.
SampsonR. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16, 317–335.
72.
SatoM. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 611–633.
73.
SatoM. (2017). Interaction mindsets, interactional behaviors, and L2 development: An affective–social–cognitive model. Language Learning, 67, 249–283.
74.
SatoM. (2020a). Generating a roadmap for possible selves via a vision intervention: Alignment of L2 motivation and classroom behavior. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 427–457.
75.
SatoM. (2020b). Metacognitive instruction for collaborative interaction: The process and product of self-regulated learning in the Chilean EFL context. In LambertC.OliverR. (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp. 215–236). Multilingual Matters.
76.
SatoM. (in press). Metacognition. In LiS.HiverP.PapiM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge.
77.
SatoM.Dussuel LamC. (2021). Metacognitive instruction with young learners: A case of willingness to communicate, L2 use, and metacognition of oral communication. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 27 April 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211004639.
78.
SatoM.LaraP. (2019). Interaction vision intervention to increase second language motivation: A classroom study. In SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 287–313). Routledge.
79.
SatoM.LoewenS. (2018). Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68, 507–545.
80.
SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.). (2019a). Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies. Routledge.
81.
SatoM.LoewenS. (2019b). Methodological strengths, challenges, and joys of classroom-based quasi-experimental research: Metacognitive instruction and corrective feedback. In DeKeyserR.Prieto BotanaG. (Eds.), Doing SLA research with implications for the classroom: Reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability (pp. 31–54). John Benjamins.
82.
SatoM.LoewenS. (2019c). Towards evidence-based second language pedagogy: Research proposal and pedagogical recommendations. In SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
83.
SatoM.McDonoughK. (2020). Predicting L2 learners’ noticing of L2 errors: Proficiency, language analytical ability, and interaction mindset. System, 93, 102301.
84.
SatoM.OyanedelJ.C. (2019). ‘I think that is a better way to teach but. . .’: EFL teachers’ conflicting beliefs about grammar teaching. System, 84, 110–122.
85.
SatoM.StorchN. (2020). Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 27 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820923582.
86.
SheenY. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835–874.
87.
ShintaniN.EllisR. (2015). Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing?System, 49, 110–119.
88.
StefanouC.ReveszA. (2015). Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 263–282.
89.
Sugita McEownM.TakeuchiO. (2014). Motivational strategies in EFL classrooms: How do teachers impact students’ motivation?Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 20–38.
90.
SuzukiY.DeKeyserR. (2017). Exploratory research on second language practice distribution: An aptitude × treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 27–56.
91.
TanC.-C.ChenC.-M.LeeH.-M. (2019). Effectiveness of a digital pen-based learning system with a reward mechanism to improve learners’ metacognitive strategies in listening. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33, 785–810.
92.
TeimouriY.PlonskyL.TabandehF. (2020). L2 grit: Passion and perseverance for second-language learning. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 29 May 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820921895.
93.
TengF. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54, 29–39.
94.
TengL.S.ZhangL.J. (2019). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference?Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701.
95.
VandergriftL.TafaghodtariM.H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.
96.
VanPattenB.SmithM. (2015). Aptitude as grammatical sensitivity and the initial stages of learning Japanese as a L2: Parametric variation and case marking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 135–165.
97.
VlaevaD.DörnyeiZ. (2021). Vision enhancement and language learning: A critical analysis of vision-building in an English for Academic Purposes programme. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 10 June 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211014551.
98.
WeinertF.E. (1987). Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding. In WeinertF.E.KluweR.H. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 1–16). Lawrence Erlbaum.
99.
YalçınŞ.SpadaN. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 239–263.
100.
YashimaT.MacIntyreP.D.IkedaM. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22, 115–137.
101.
YashimaT.NishidaR.MizumotoA. (2017). Influence of learner beliefs and gender on the motivating power of L2 selves. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 691–711.
102.
YilmazY.GranenaG. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 147–161.
103.
ZhangD.ZhangL.J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching. In GaoA. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 883–897). Springer.
