Implementing social-emotional learning skills into Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR), the current study intended to extend the efficacy of CSR for teaching reading strategies when applying it to students in rural areas from a working-class community. To this purpose, forty-four students who made the comparison and the experimental groups were taught reading strategies through CSR and ECSR (Extended Collaborative Strategic Reading), respectively. A reading comprehension test with different question types was given to the students as pretest and posttest, and an interview was given at the end of the study to investigate the perception of the students toward reading strategy instruction through CSR and ECSR. Analysis of data indicated that only the ECSR group improved significantly in overall reading comprehension, but the componential analysis of the reading test showed that despite the fact that the CSR group showed no significant improvement in the reading tests in four formats (true–false, multiple-choice, matching, and cloze), the ECSR group improved significantly in reading tests with multiple-choice and cloze test formats. Moreover, although the students in both groups showed a positive view toward the interventions, the students in the ECSR group improved in social-emotional and communication skills. It seems that CSR can be improved to be effective by implementing the emotional component to it.
AldersonJ.C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BernhardtE.B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
3.
BlatchfordP.KutnickP.BainesE.GaltonM. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153–172.
4.
BoardmanA.G.BoeléA.L.KlingnerJ.K. (2018). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 175–195.
5.
CohenE. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. 2nd edition.New York: Teacher College Press.
CreswellJ.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nd edition.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
8.
DennisD.V. (2009). ‘I’m not stupid’: How assessment drives (in) appropriate reading instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53, 283–290.
9.
DiDonatoN.C. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25–47.
10.
DonatoR.MacCormickD. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 453–464.
11.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
DurlakJ.A.WeissbergR.P.DymnickiA.TaylorR.D.SchellingerK.B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
13.
EliasM.J.ZinsJ.E.WeissbergR.P., et al. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14.
FanY.C. (2009). Implementing Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) in an EFL context in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
15.
FanY.-C. (2010). The effect of comprehension strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Asian Social Science, 6, 19–29.
16.
FosterP.OhtaA.S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430.
17.
FowlerW.S.CoeN. (1976). Nelson English language tests. London: Butler & Tanner.
18.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of the multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
19.
GardnerH. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.
20.
GolemanD. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
21.
GrabeW. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375–406.
22.
HidiS.RenningerK.A.KrappA. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In DayD.Y.StenbergR.J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
HofstedeG. (2003). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
HudsonT. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HuangC.Y. (2004). Think to win: An inquiry-based approach via Collaborative Strategic Reading technique to teach English reading in a senior high EFL classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
27.
JacobsG.RenandyaW.A. (2019). Student centered cooperative learning: linking concepts in education to promote student learning. Singapore: Springer Nature.
28.
JitendraA.K.BurgessC.GajriaM. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77, 135–159.
29.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonR.T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In SharanS. (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 23–37). New York: Praeger.
30.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonF. (2006). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. 7th edition.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
JonesB.PalinscarA.OgleD.CarrE. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the current areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32.
KlingnerJ.K.VaughnS. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 275–293.
KlingnerJ.K.VaughnS. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52, 738–747.
35.
KlingnerJ.K.VaughnS.SchummJ.S. (1998). Collaborative Strategic Reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–22.
36.
KlingnerJ.K.VaughnS.BoardmanA.SwansonE. (2012). Now we get it! Boosting comprehension with Collaborative Strategic Reading. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
KobayashiM. (2002). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organization and response format. Language Testing, 19, 193–220.
38.
LantolfJ.P.AppelG. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Greenwood Publishing Group.
39.
LongM.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In RitchieW.C.BhatiaT.K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
López-MondéjarL.M.PastorL.M.T. (2017). Development of socio-emotional skills through cooperative learning in a university environment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 432–437.
41.
MacIntyreP.D. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 45–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42.
MahnH.John-SteinerV. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In WellsG.ClaxtonG. (Eds.) Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
MansteadA.S. (1991). Emotion in social life. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 353–362.
44.
MariaK. (2000). Conceptual change instruction: A social constructivist perspective. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16, 5–22.
45.
MartinN.D.TissenbaumC.D.GnesdilowD.PuntambekarS. (2019). Fading distributed scaffolds: The importance of complementarity between teacher and material scaffolds. Instructional Science, 47, 69–98.
46.
MarulandaZ.K. (2010). Social and emotional learning strategies to support students in challenging schools. Unpublished masters dissertation, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, CA, USA. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509463 (accessed April 2021).
47.
MaynardD.W. (1988). Transcript conventions. Social Problems, 35, 1–2.
48.
McEwanE.K (2004). Seven strategies of highly effective readers. Using cognitive research to boost K-8 achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49.
Memari HanjaniA.LiL. (2017). Cooperative learning pedagogy: a response to an urgent need in the Iranian EFL reading comprehension context. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 36, 33–58.
50.
MokhtariK.DimitrovD.M.ReichardC.A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 219–246.
51.
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). (2011). The impact of Collaborative Strategic Reading on the reading comprehension of grade 5 students in linguistically diverse schools (NCEE 2011-4001). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED517770 (accessed April 2021).
52.
OxfordR.L. (2015). Emotion as the amplifier and the primary motive: Some theories of emotion with relevance to language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 371–393.
53.
PalincsarA.S.BrownA.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
54.
PallantJ. (2016). Survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 6th edition.New York: McGraw-Hill.
55.
PalumboA.LoiaconoV. (2009). Understanding the causes of intermediate and middle school comprehension problems. International Journal of Special Education, 24, 75–81.
PekrunR.GoetzT.TitzW.PerryR.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–106.
58.
PressleyM. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
59.
PressleyM.Beard El-DinaryP.BrownR. (1992). Skilled and not-so-skilled reading: Good information processing and not-so-good information processing. In PressleyM.HarrisK.GuthrieJ. (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools (pp. 91–127). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60.
PressleyM.El-DinaryP.B.GaskinsI., et al. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 513–555.
61.
ReyesO.GillockK.L.KobusK.SanchezB. (2000). A longitudinal examination of the transition into senior high school for adolescents from urban, low-income status, and predominantly minority backgrounds. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 519–544.
62.
RoehlerL.R.DuffyG.G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension process. In DuffyG.G.RoehlerL.R.MasonJ. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265–280). New York: Longman.
63.
SadeghiK.RichardsJ.C. (2016). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37, 419–434.
SchweisfurthM. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem?International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 425–432.
66.
SchweisfurthM. (2013). Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development?Abingdon: Routledge.
ShohamyE.InbarO. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8, 23–40.
69.
SlavinR.E. (1997). Co-operative learning among students. In SternD.HuberG.L. (Eds.), Active learning for students and teachers. (pp. 159–173). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
70.
SpathL.M. (2009). Using social emotional skills in cooperative groups to improve student performance. Unpublished masters dissertation, St John Fisher College, Pittsford, NY, USA. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/mathcs_etd_masters/21 (accessed April 2021).
71.
SwainM. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46, 195–207.
72.
TurukM.C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the second language classroom. Annual Review of Education, Communication, and Language Sciences, 5, 244–262.
73.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
WangY.YangZ.ZhangY., et al. (2019). The effect of social-emotional competency on child development in western China. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1282.
75.
WeaverR.R.QiJ. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 570–601.
76.
WendenA. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. London: Prentice-Hall.
77.
WymanP. (2018). Academic achievement with cooperative learning using homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects 1707. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1707 (accessed April 2021).
78.
ZambranoJ.KirschnerF.SwellerJ.KirschnerP.A. (2019). Effects of group experience and information distribution on collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 47, 531–550.
79.
ZhengY.ChengL.KlingerD.A. (2007). Do test formats in reading comprehension affect second-language students’ test performance differently?TESL Canada Journal, 25, 65–80.
80.
ZinsJ.E.BloodworthM.R.WeissbergR.P.WahlbergH.J. (2007). The Scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 191–210.
81.
ZinsJ.E.EliasM.J. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 233–255.
82.
ZinsJ.E.WeissbergR.P.WangM.C.WalbergH.J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say?New York: Teachers College Press.
