Focusing on the teaching of listening strategies to second language (L2) learners, this study sought to revisit Renandya and Farrell’s (2011) claims that explicit listening strategy instruction for lower-proficiency learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) is a fruitless endeavor. As such, we implemented a quasi-experimental study to measure the effectiveness of a metacognitive intervention for a convenience sample of lower-proficiency (CEFR A2) Japanese university EFL learners (n = 129). The training program focused on an explicit process-based approach, involving integrated experiential learning tasks and guided reflections, to develop learners’ L2 listening skills. Data collection consisted of TOEIC® test scores, listening comprehension tests, cloze tests, a listening self-efficacy questionnaire, and a post-treatment survey. While the training program was received favorably by students, and students displayed a slightly more confident stance towards listening in their L2, we were unable to find any strong empirical evidence that our lower-proficiency EFL learners’ listening performance improved. As such, these results provide evidence of a potential proficiency threshold for EFL learners to start to benefit from a strategy-focused metacognitive intervention.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
2.
BjörkmanB. (2014). An analysis of polyadic English as a lingua franca (ELF)speech: A communicative strategies framework. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 122–138.
3.
BuckG. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BurnsA. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Abingdon: Routledge.
5.
CanagarajahS. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 229–242.
6.
ChangA. (2012). Gains to L2 learners from extensive listening: listening development, vocabulary acquisition and perceptions of the intervention. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 25–47.
7.
ChangA.MillettS. (2016). The effects of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: Some hard evidence. ELT Journal, 68, 31–40.
8.
ChapmanM.NewfieldsT. (2008). The ‘new’ TOEIC. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12, 32–37. Available at: http://hosted.jalt.org/test/cha_new.htm (accessed March 2021).
9.
ChenA.-H. (2009). Listening strategy instruction: Exploring Taiwanese college students’ strategy development. Asian EFL Journal, 11, 54–85.
10.
ChildsM. (1995) Good and bad uses of TOEIC by Japanese companies. In BrownJ.D.YamashitaS.O. (Eds.). Language Testing in Japan (pp. 66–75). Tokyo: JALT.
11.
CrossJ. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13, 151–176.
12.
CrossJ. (2012). Listening strategy instruction (or extensive listening?): A response to Renandya (2012). ELTWorldOnline.com, 3, 1–6.
13.
CrossJ. (2015). Metacognition in L2 listening: Clarifying instructional theory and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 883–892. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43893793 (accessed March 2021).
14.
CrossJ.VandergriftL. (2014). Guidelines for designing and conducting L2 listening studies. ELT Journal, 69, 86–89.
15.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
FieldJ. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GohC.M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75.
18.
GraddolD. (2003). The decline of the native speaker. In AndermanG.RogersM. (Eds.), Translation today: Trends and perspectives (pp. 152–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19.
GrahamS. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learner’s perspective. System, 34, 165–182.
20.
GrahamS. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 113–117.
21.
GrahamS. (2017). Research into practice: listening strategies in an instructed classroom setting. Language Teaching, 50, 107–119.
22.
GrahamS.MacaroE. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–783.
23.
GrahamS.SantosD. (2015). Strategies for second language listening. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
GrahamS.SantosD.VanderplankR. (2011). Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use. Language Teaching Research, 15, 435–456.
25.
HasanA.S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13, 137–153.
26.
JenkinsJ. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
KaurJ. (2014). Teaching the effective use of ELF: Insights from research into ELF pragmatics. Waseda Working Papers in ELF (English as a Lingua Franca), 3, 158–168.
28.
KemmisS.McTaggartR., (Eds.) (1988). The action research planner. 3rd edition.Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
KobayashiA. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL Learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15, 310–328.
31.
LennonP. (2021). The foundations of teaching English as a foreign language. Abingdon: Routledge.
32.
LiaoC.HatrakN.YuF. (2010). Comparison of content, item statistics, and test-taker performance on the redesigned and classic TOEIC listening and reading test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Available at: https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-04.pdf (accessed March 2021).
33.
LynchT. (2009). Teaching second language listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
MacaroE.GrahamS.WooreR. (2016). Improving foreign language teaching: Towards a research-based curriculum and pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.
35.
MatthewsJ. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23–36.
36.
McBrideP. (2020). Considering English teaching in the context of ELF. In LeeH.SpolskyB. (Eds.), Localizing global English (pp. 3–19). Abingdon: Routledge.
37.
McLeanS.KramerB.BeglarD. (2015). The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research, 19, 741–760.
38.
MeeceJ.L.WigfieldA.EcclesJ.S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.
39.
MendelsohnD.J. (2006). Learning how to listen using learning strategies. In Usó-JuanE.Martínez-FlorA. (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 75–90). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
40.
MillettS. (2017). Speed readings for ESL learners, 500 BNC. ELI Occasional Publication No. 28. Wellington, New Zealand: School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
41.
MillinerB.ChaikulR. (2018). Extensive listening in the ELF Classroom with ELLLO. The Center for ELF Journal, 4, 36–50.
42.
MillinerB.DimoskiB. (2019). Explicit listening strategy training for ELF learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 16, 833–859.
43.
MillsN.PajaresF.HerronC. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language learning, 57, 417–442.
44.
PhakitiA. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London: Bloomsbury.
45.
PlonskyL.OswaldF.L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
46.
RahimiM.AbediS. (2014). The relationship between listening self-efficacy and metacognitive awareness of listening strategies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1454–1460.
47.
RenandyaW. (2012). Five reasons why listening strategy instruction might not work with lower proficiency learners. ELTWorldOnline.com, 4, 1–11.
48.
RenandyaW.A.FarrellT.S.C. (2011). ‘Teacher the tape is too fast!’ Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65, 52–59.
49.
RostM. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 listening instruction. In Uso-JuanE.Martínez-FlorA. (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 47–74). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
50.
RostM. (2016). Teaching and researching listening. Abingdon: Routledge.
51.
RubinJ.ChamotA.U.HarrisV.AndersonN.J. (2007). Intervening in the use of strategies. In CohenA.D.MacaroE. (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 141–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SiegelJ.SiegelA. (2013). Empirical and attitudinal effects of bottom-up listening activities in the L2 classroom. ELT World Online, 5, 1–25.
56.
SiegelJ.SiegelA. (2015). Getting to the bottom of L2 listening instruction: Making a case for bottom-up activities. Studies in Second Language Teaching and Research, 5, 637–662.
57.
StaffordM. (2017). Successful keys to the TOEIC® listening and reading test: Goal 400. 2nd edition.Tokyo: Kirihara Shoten.
58.
TakeiA. (2002). Eigo listening ron [Introduction to English listening]. Tokyo: Kagensha.
59.
VandergriftL. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied linguistics, 26, 70–89.
60.
VandergriftL. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210.
61.
VandergriftL.BakerS. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390–416.
62.
VandergriftL.TafaghodtariM.H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.
63.
VandergriftL.GohC.C.MareschalC.J.TafaghodtariM.H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462.
64.
WalkerR. (2010). Teaching the pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
WangY.Treffers-Daller, (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150.
66.
WenQ. (2012). English as a lingua franca: A pedagogical perspective. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1, 371–376.
67.
YeldhamM. (2009). Approaches to second language listening instruction: Investigating the top/down/bottom-up debate. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.
68.
YeldhamM. (2016). Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies-based approach with an interactive, strategies/bottom-up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 394–420. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43893825 (accessed March 2021).
69.
YeldhamM. (2017). Techniques for researching L2 listeners. System, 66, 13–26.
70.
YeldhamM. (2018). L2 listening instruction: More bottom-up or more top-down?The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15, 805–810.
71.
YeldhamM.GrubaP. (2016). The development of individual learners in an L2 listening strategies course. Language Teaching Research, 20, 9–34.
72.
YonezakiH. (2017). A study on how to enhance spoken word recognition by Japanese EFL Learners with lower levels of proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hyogo University of Education, Hyogo, Japan.
73.
ZanjaniB.A.IzadpanahS. (2016). The impact of listening strategies on improving learners’ listening skill in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7, 1089–1096.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
