This study investigates the use of formulaic sequences (FS) in academic writings of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language across different levels of studies at a public university in China. Frequency-based formulas were retrieved from a corpus of student academic texts written at five time points between Year 1 and Year 3. The structure, semantic transparency (as measured by mutual information, abbreviated as MI), function of the formulas and first language – second language (L1–L2) congruency were explored to identify factors influencing FS development over time using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling (GLMM). Results indicate that MI, structure and assumed learners’ proficiency (time points) and their interactions produced significant effects on the development of L2 FS, but function and congruency did not. The individual variation and nonlinearity of FS development were interpreted with Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). Based on the longitudinal study, we highlight the usefulness of GLMM in accounting for both systematicity and individual variation in L2 development from a CDST perspective.
ÄdelA.ErmanB. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 81–92.
2.
AdolphsS.DurowV. (2004). Social-cultural integration and the development of formulaic sequences. In: SchmittN. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 107–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3.
AkaikeH. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In ParzenE.TanabeK.KitagawaG. (Eds.), Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 199–213). Berlin: Springer.
4.
AnthonyL. (2014). AntConc Version 3.4.3 [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.
5.
BahnsJ.EldawM. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations?System, 21, 101–114.
6.
BarkaouiK. (2014). Quantitative approaches for analyzing longitudinal data in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 65–101.
7.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67.
8.
BestgenY.GrangerS. (2014). Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28–41.
9.
BiberD.BarbieriF. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263–286.
10.
BiberD.GrayB. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. ETS Research Report Series, RR-13-04.
11.
BiberD.ConradS.CortesV. (2004). If you look at . . .: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371–405.
12.
BiberD.JohanssonS.LeechG.ConradS.FineganE.QuirkR. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English: Volume 2. London: Longman.
13.
BlytheR.A.CroftW.A. (2009). The speech community in evolutionary language dynamics. Language Learning, 59, 47–63.
14.
BultéB.HousenA. (2020). A critical appraisal of the CDST approach to investigating linguistic complexity in L2 writing development. In FogalG.G.VerspoorM.H. (Eds.), Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 writing development (pp. 207–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15.
CandarliD. (2020). A longitudinal study of multi-word constructions in L2 academic writing: The effects of frequency and dispersion. Reading and Writing. Epub 6 December 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-020-10108-3.
16.
CarrollJ.B.WhiteM.N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95.
17.
CaspiT.LowieW. (2013). The dynamics of L2 vocabulary development: A case study of receptive and productive knowledge. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13, 437–462.
18.
CastroE. (2018). Complex adaptive systems, language advising, and motivation: A longitudinal case study with a Brazilian student of English. System, 74, 138–148.
19.
ChenY.-H.BakerP. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 30–49.
20.
ChenY.-H.BakerP. (2016). Investigating criterial discourse features across second Language development: lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37, 849–880.
21.
ChurchillE. (2007). A dynamic systems account of learning a word: From ecology to form relations. Applied Linguistics, 29, 339–358.
22.
CortesV. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 33–43.
23.
CoxheadA. (2008). Phraseology and English for academic purposes. In MeunierF.GrangerS. (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 149–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
CrossleyS.SalsburyT.L. (2011). The development of lexical bundle accuracy and production in English second language speakers. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, 1–26.
25.
CunningsI. (2012). An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research, 28, 369–382.
26.
DavisB.SumaraD.J.SumaraD. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Hove: Psychology Press.
27.
De BotK. (2017). Complexity theory and dynamic systems theory. In OrtegaL.HanZ. (Eds.) Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28.
De BotK.LowieW.VerspoorM. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.
29.
DingC.ReynoldsB.L. (2019). The effects of L1 congruency, L2 proficiency, and the collocate-node relationship on the processing of L2 English collocations by L1-Chinese EFL learners. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 331–357.
30.
DongJ. (2016). A dynamic systems theory approach to development of listening strategy use and listening performance. System, 63, 149–165.
31.
DongY. (2018). Complex dynamic systems in students of interpreting training. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 13, 185–207.
32.
DuanS. (2007). Investigating ‘Plateau Phenomenon’ in the process of vocabulary depth acquisition with chunks. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 27, 27–32.
33.
DuanS. (2015). A study of hedge sequences of Chinese EFL learners’ oral English under the framework of Complex Systems Theory. Foreign Language World, 171, 45–53.
34.
DurrantP.SchmittN. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 157–177.
35.
DurrantP.SchmittN. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26, 163–188.
36.
EllisN.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
37.
EllisN.C.Simpson-VlachR.MaynardC. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. Tesol Quarterly, 42, 375–396.
38.
ErmanB.WarrenB. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20, 29–62.
39.
FernándezB.G.SchmittN. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166, 94–126.
40.
FogalG.G. (2019). Investigating variability in L2 development: Extending a complexity theory perspective on L2 writing studies and authorial voice. Applied Linguistics, 41, 575–600.
41.
FreemanD.L.CameronL. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 200–213.
42.
GablasovaD.BrezinaV.McEneryT. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67, 155–179.
43.
GarnerJ.CrossleyS. (2018). A latent curve model approach to studying L2 n-gram development. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 494–511.
44.
GarnierM.SchmittN. (2016). Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge?System, 59, 29–44.
45.
GrangerS. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and lexical phrases. In CowieA.P. (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and application (pp. 145–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
GrangerS. (2019). Formulaic sequences in learner corpora: Collocations and lexical bundles. In Siyanova-ChanturiaA.Pellicer-SanchezA. (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 228–247). London: Routledge.
47.
GrangerS.PaquotM. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In GrangerS.MeunierF. (Eds), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–49). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
48.
GroomN. (2009). Effects of second language immersion on second language collocational development. In BarfieldA.GyllstadH. (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (pp. 21–33). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
GyllstadH.WolterB. (2016). Collocational processing in light of the phraseological continuum model: Does semantic transparency matter?Language Learning, 66, 296–323.
50.
HouJ.LoertsH.VerspoorM.H. (2018a). Chunk use and development in advanced Chinese L2 learners of English. Language Teaching Research, 22, 148–168.
51.
HouJ.LoertsH.VerspoorM.H. (2018b). Exploring attitude and test-driven motivation towards English at Chinese universities. International Journal of Language Studies, 12, 37–60.
52.
HouJ.VerspoorM.LoertsH. (2016). An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 65–96.
53.
HowarthP. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 24–44.
54.
HunstonS. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
HylandK. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4–21.
56.
HylandK. (2012). Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150–169.
57.
JeongH.JiangN. (2019). Representation and processing of lexical bundles: Evidence from word monitoring. System, 80, 188–198.
58.
JiangN. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.
59.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP.B.ChristensenR.H.B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82.
60.
LangackerR.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In RobinsonP.EllisN.C. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 66–88). Abingdon: Routledge.
61.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
62.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics?Language Teaching, 45, 202–214.
63.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2018). Second language acquisition, WE, and language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). World Englishes, 37, 80–92.
64.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2019). On language learner agency: A Complex Dynamic Systems Theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 61–79.
65.
Larsen-FreemanD.CameronL. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
LauferB. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.
67.
LauferB.WaldmanT. (2011). Verb–noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647–672.
68.
LeedhamM. (2015). Chinese students’ writing in English: Implications from a corpus-driven study. Abingdon: Routledge.
69.
LiJ.SchmittN. (2009). The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 85–102.
70.
LiJ.SchmittN. (2010). The development of collocation use in academic texts by advanced L2 learners: A multiple case study approach. In WoodD. (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 22–46). London: Continuum.
71.
LowieW.VerspoorM. (2015). Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 65, 63–88.
72.
LuX.DengJ. (2019). With the rapid development: A contrastive analysis of lexical bundles in dissertation abstracts by Chinese and L1 English doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 21–36.
73.
MacisM.SchmittN. (2016). Not just ‘small potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research, 21, 321–340.
74.
ManchónR. (2012). L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives: Volume 6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
75.
MaroccoD.CangelosiA.NolfiS. (2003). The emergence of communication in evolutionary robots. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361, 2397–2421.
76.
MartinezR.MurphyV.A. (2011). Effect of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension. Tesol Quarterly, 45, 267–290.
MeunierF. (2012). Formulaic language and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 111–129.
79.
MiltonJ. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition: Volume 45. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
80.
MurakamiA. (2016). Modeling systematicity and individuality in nonlinear second language development: The case of English grammatical morphemes. Language Learning, 66, 834–871.
81.
NesselhaufN. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.
82.
NesselhaufN. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus: Volume 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83.
ÖksüzD.BrezinaV.RebuschatP. (2020). Collocational Processing in L1 and L2: The effects of word frequency, collocational frequency, and association. Language Learning, 71, 55–98.
84.
OrtegaL. (2012). Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404–415.
85.
OrtegaL.ByrnesH. (2009). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. Abingdon: Routledge.
86.
OrtegaL.Iberri-SheaG. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45.
87.
PaquotM. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, 35, 121–145.
88.
PetersE. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20, 113–138.
89.
PolatB.KimY. (2013). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35, 184–207.
90.
PouporeG. (2018). A complex systems investigation of group work dynamics in L2 interactive tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 350–370.
91.
PuimègeE.PetersE. (2019). Learning formulaic sequence through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 525–549.
92.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software manual]. Vienna: R Core Team.
93.
ReppenR. (2009). Exploring L1 and L2 writing development through collocations: A corpus-based look. In BarfieldA.GyllstadH. (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (pp. 49–59). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
94.
RuanZ. (2016). Lexical bundles in Chinese undergraduate academic writing at an English medium university. RELC Journal, 48, 327–340.
95.
SchmittN.CarterR. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action. Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
96.
SchmittN.DornyeiZ.AdolphsS.DurowV. (2004). Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences. In SchmittN. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 55–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
97.
Siyanova-ChanturiaA. (2015). Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System, 53, 148–160.
98.
Siyanova-ChanturiaA.MartinezR. (2015). The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics, 36, 549–569.
99.
Siyanova-ChanturiaA.SpinaS. (2020). Multi-word expressions in second language writing: A large-scale longitudinal learner corpus study. Language Learning, 70, 420–463.
100.
Siyanova-ChanturiaA.ConklinK.SchmittN. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251–272.
101.
SpinaS. (2019). The development of phraseological errors in Chinese learner Italian: A longitudinal study. Unpublished paper presented at the Widening the Scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected Papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
102.
StaplesS.EgbertJ.BiberD.McClairA. (2013). Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 214–225.
103.
SteenbeekH.JansenL.Van GeertP. (2012). Scaffolding dynamics and the emergence of problematic learning trajectories. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 64–75.
104.
TomaselloM. (2010). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT press.
105.
ToomerM.ElgortI. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69, 405–439.
106.
Van GeertP. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3–53.
107.
VerspoorM. (2012). Symposium: Dynamic systems/complexity theory as a new approach to second language development. Language Teaching, 45, 533–534.
108.
VerspoorM. (2013). Dynamic systems theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In García MayoM.Gutiérrez MangadoM.J.Martínez-AdriánM. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
109.
VerspoorM.SmiskovaH. (2012). Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage based perspective. In ManchónR. (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–46 ). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
110.
VerspoorM.De BotK.LowieW. (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques: Volume 29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
111.
VerspoorM.SchmidM.S.XuX. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 239–263.
112.
VoS. (2019). Use of lexical features in non-native academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 1–12.
113.
VyatkinaN.HirschmannH.GolcherF. (2015). Syntactic modification at early stages of L2 German writing development: A longitudinal learner corpus study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 28–50.
114.
WebbS.NewtonJ.ChangA. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91–120.
115.
WenQ. (2006). A longitudinal study on the changes in speaking vocabulary by English majors in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 38, 189–195.
116.
WolterB.GyllstadH. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430–449.
117.
WolterB.GyllstadH. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451–482.
118.
WolterB.YamashitaJ. (2018). Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing: what accounts for L2 performance?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 395–416.
119.
WrayA. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120.
WrayA.PerkinsM.R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20, 1–28.
121.
YamashitaJ.JiangN. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647–668.
122.
YoonH.J. (2016). Association strength of verb-noun combinations in experienced NS and less experienced NNS writing: Longitudinal and cross-sectional findings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 42–57.
123.
YorioC.A. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In HyltenstamK.OblerL.K. (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 55–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124.
ZhangJ. (2013). Study on Chinese EFL learners’ processing of formulaic language. Foreign Language World, 158, 76–85.
125.
ZhengY. (2012). Exploring long-term productive vocabulary development in an EFL context: The role of motivation. System, 40, 104–119.
126.
ZhengY. (2016). The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use: A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English. System, 56, 40–53.
