Although boredom can be regarded as a ubiquitous emotion in most educational settings, including foreign and second language classrooms, and this condition can have a detrimental effect on the process of learning, it has to a large extent escaped the attention of second language acquisition researchers dealing with individual learner differences. The study reported in this article sought to fill this gap by investigating the trajectories of boredom exhibited in a practical English class by 11 Polish university students majoring in English. The data were collected by means of a background questionnaire, the Boredom in Practical English Language Classes Questionnaire (BPELC), and an in-class boredom questionnaire, including a self-report boredom grid, an open-ended query and an evaluation of the class based on a semantic differential scale. It was found that general proneness to experience boredom in practical English classes translated into distinct patterns of boredom in the class in question. At the same time, it turned out that the individual trajectories in experiencing boredom often deviated from the general patterns, being shaped by unpredictable constellations of individual and contextual factors.
AppletonJ.J.ChristensonS.L.FurlongM.J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the School, 45, 369–386.
2.
BeermannC.CronjägerH. (2011). Die Rolle der Fachwertschätzung für Freude, Langeweile und Angst im Fach Französisch: Eine mehrebenenanalytische Längsschnittstudie über die Sekundarstufe I unter Verwendung von Piecewise Growth Modellen [The role of technical appreciation for joy, boredom and fear in learning French: A multi-level longitudinal study among secondary learners using piecewise growth models]. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 16, 18–34.
3.
BridgelandJ.BruceM.HariharanA. (2013). The missing piece: A national teacher survey on how social and emotional learning can empower children and transform schools. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises.
4.
ChapmanK.E. (2013). Boredom in the German foreign language classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
5.
DanielsL.M.TzeM.C.GoetzT. (2015). Examining boredom: Different causes for different coping profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 255–261.
6.
DanielsL.M.StupniskyR.H.PekrunR., et al. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948–963.
7.
DaschmannE.C.GoetzT.StupinskyR.H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 421–440.
8.
DaviesJ.FortneyM. (2012). The Menton theory of engagement and boredom. Unpublished poster presented at the First Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
9.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
DörnyeiZ. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 19–30.
11.
EastwoodJ.D.FrischenA.FenskeM.J.SmilekD. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 482–495.
12.
FahlmanS.A. (2009). Development and validation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
13.
GoetzT.FrenzelA.C.HallN.C. (2014). Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 401–419.
14.
GoldbergY.K.EastwoodJ.D.LaGuardiaJ.DanckertJ. (2011). Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 647–666.
15.
HarrisM.B. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of boredom proneness and boredom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 576–598.
16.
HillA.B.PerkinsR.E. (1985). Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 235–240.
17.
JeanG.SimardD. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring?Foreign Language Annals, 44, 467–494.
18.
KassS.J.WallaceJ.C.VodanovichS.J. (2003). Boredom proneness and sleep disorders as predictors of adult attention deficit scores. Journal of Attention Disorders, 7, 83–91.
19.
KikuchiK. (2015). Demotivation in second language acquisition: Insights from Japan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
20.
KrukM. (2016a). Investigating the changing nature of boredom in the English language classroom: Results of a study. In DłutekA.PietrzakD. (Eds.), Nowy wymiar filologii (pp. 252–263). Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej w Płocku.
21.
KrukM. (2016b). Variations in motivation, anxiety and boredom in learning English in Second Life. The EUROCALL Review, 23, 25–39.
22.
KrukM.ZawodniakJ. (2017). Nuda a praktyczna nauka języka angielskiego [Boredom and practical learning of English]. Neofilolog, 49, 115–131.
23.
KrukM.ZawodniakJ. (2018). Boredom in practical English language classes: Insights from interview data. In SzymańskiL.ZawodniakJ.ŁobodziecA.SmolukM. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary views on the English language, literature and culture (pp. 177–191). Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski.
24.
LamS.WongB.P.H.YangH.LuiY. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403–419). New York: Springer.
25.
LarsonR.W.RichardsM.H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99, 418–433.
26.
LePeraN. (2011). Relationships between boredom proneness, mindfulness, anxiety, depression and substance use. The New Psychology Bulletin, 8, 15–25.
27.
MacIntyreP.D.DörnyeiZ.HenryA. (2014). Conclusion: Hot enough to be cool: The promise of dynamic systems research. In DörnyeiZ.MacIntyreP.D.HenryA. (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 419–429). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
28.
MacklemG.L. (2015). Boredom in the classroom: Addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. New York: Springer.
29.
MannS.RobinsonA. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 243–258.
30.
MartinM.SadloG.StewG. (2006). The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 193–211.
31.
Mercer-LynnK.B.FloraD.B.FahlmanS.A.EastwoodJ.D. (2011). The measurement of boredom: Differences between existing self-report scales. Assessment, 20, 585–596.
32.
MerrifieldC.DanckertJ. (2014). Characterizing the psychophysiological signature of boredom. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 481–491.
33.
MikulasW.L.VodanovichS.J. (1993). The essence of boredom. The Psychological Record, 43, 3–12.
34.
Mystkowska-WiertelakA.PawlakM. (2017). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
35.
NettU.E.GoetzT.DanielsL.M. (2010). What to do when feeling bored?: Students’ strategies for coping with boredom. Learning & Individual Differences, 20, 626–638.
36.
NettU.E.GoetzT.HallN.C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 49–59.
37.
PawlakM. (2012). The dynamic nature of motivation in language learning: A classroom perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 249–278.
38.
PawlakM. (2017). Overview of learner individual differences and their mediating effects on the process and outcome of interaction. In Gurzynski-WeissL. (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 19–40). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
39.
PawlakM.Mystkowska-WiertelakA.BielakJ. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate: A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20, 654–671.
40.
PeacockM. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51, 144–156.
41.
PekrunR. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
42.
PekrunR.GoetzT.DanielsL.M.StupinskyR.HPerryR.P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531–549.
43.
PinielK.CsizérK. (2013). L2 motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy: The interrelationship of individual variables in the secondary school context. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 523–550.
44.
ReidJ.M. (1987), The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–111.
45.
ShernoffD.J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.
46.
SiemerE.A. (2009). Bored out of their minds: The detrimental effects of no child left behind on gifted children. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 30, 539–560.
47.
SkinnerE.FurrerC.MarchandG.KindermannT. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.
48.
ThackrayR.I. (1981). The stress of boredom and monotony: A consideration of the evidence. Psychosomatic Medicine, 43, 165–176.
49.
VeigaF.H.ReeveJ.WentzelK.RobuV. (2014). Assessing students’ engagement: A review of instruments with psychometric qualities. In VeigaF.H. (Ed.), Students’ engagement in school: International perspectives of psychology and education (pp. 38–57). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.
50.
WeinermanJ.KennerC. (2016). Boredom: That which shall not be named. Journal of Developmental Education, 40, 18–23.
