The present study employed a mixed methods quasi-experimental design to investigate the effectiveness of applying motivational strategies and mental imagery (i.e. visionary techniques) to facilitate second language (L2) vocabulary learning. Four treatment sessions were integrated into a six-week language course offered to 150 intermediate students in nine classes of English as a foreign language (EFL), which were divided into three groups: motivational group, visionary group and control group. The target language items involved 56 formulaic sequences, and the outcome was assessed by a multiple-choice vocabulary test. The quantitative results were accompanied by qualitative data, aimed at gaining a deeper understanding of the test results. The findings revealed that both motivational strategies and visionary techniques proved effective in increasing the students’ ability to recognize the form of the target sequences, and that the visionary condition was superior to the use of motivational strategies. The benefits of the deeper engagement level associated with mental imagery were corroborated by a delayed posttest. The article concludes with a theoretical discussion of the benefits of visualisation in vocabulary acquisition.
AlaliF.SchmittN. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same or different from teaching single words?TESOL Journal, 3, 153–180.
2.
AlrabaiF. (2014). The effects of teachers’ in-class motivational intervention on learners’ EFL achievement. Applied Linguistics, 37, 307–333.
3.
BarcroftJ. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323–363.
4.
BoersF.LindstrombergS. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110.
5.
BoersF.LindstrombergS.EyckmansJ. (2014). Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising?Language Awareness, 23, 291–303.
6.
BoersF.WarrenP.HeL.DeconinckJ. (2017). Does adding pictures to glosses enhance vocabulary uptake from reading?System, 66, 113–129.
7.
BoersF.DemecheleerM.HeL., et al. (2017). Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, 448–469.
8.
BooZ.DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145–157.
9.
ChenH.C. (1990). Lexical processing in a non-native language: Effects of language proficiency and learning strategy. Memory & Cognition, 18, 279–288.
10.
ChengH.-F.DörnyeiZ. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 153–174.
11.
ChoiS. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye-movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21, 403–426.
12.
Colovic-MarkovicJ. (2019). ‘The class changed the way I read’: The effects of explicit instruction of academic formulas on ESL writers. Applied Language Learning, 29, 17–51.
13.
CraikF.I.M.LockhartR.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671–684.
14.
CsizérK. (2017). Motivation in the L2 Classroom. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 418–432). Abingdon: Routledge.
15.
DörnyeiZ. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
19.
DörnyeiZ. (2014a). Motivation in second language learning. In Celce-MurciaM.BrintonD.M.SnowM.A. (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 518–531). 4th edition.Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning / Cengage Learning.
20.
DörnyeiZ. (2014b). Future self-guides and vision. In CsizérK.MagidM. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 7–18). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
21.
DörnyeiZ.ChanL. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self-images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63, 437–462.
22.
DörnyeiZ.CsizérK. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2, 203–229.
23.
DörnyeiZ.KubanyiovaM. (2014). Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Abingdon: Routledge.
25.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. 2nd edition.Harlow: Longman.
26.
EntwistleN.J. (2013). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Revised edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
27.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
28.
GardnerR.C.MacIntyreP.D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57–72.
29.
González-FernándezB.SchmittN. (2019). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics. Epub ahead of print 2 January 2019. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amy057.
30.
GuilloteauxM.J.DörnyeiZ. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 55–77.
31.
HigginsE.T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.
32.
HuangS.WillsonV.EslamiZ. (2012). The effects of task involvement load on L2 incidental vocabulary learning: A metaanalytic study. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 544–557.
33.
KeatingG. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12, 365–386.
34.
KimY.J. (2008). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 285–325.
35.
LambM.V. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50, 301–346.
36.
LauferB. (2017). The three ‘I’ s of second language vocabulary learning. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 343–352). Abingdon: Routledge.
37.
LauferB.GirsaiN. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 24, 29–49.
38.
LauferB.HulstijnJ. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.
39.
LauferB.Rozovski-RoitblatB. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19, 687–711.
40.
Le-ThiD.RodgersM.P.H.Pellicer-SánchezA. (2017). Teaching formulaic sequences in an english-language class: The effects of explicit instruction versus coursebook instruction. TESL Canada Journal, 34, 111–139.
41.
LindstrombergS.BoersF. (2008). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The mnemonic power of assonance. System, 36, 423–436.
42.
MacIntyreP.D.VinczeL. (2017). Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 61–88.
43.
MackayJ. (2014). Applications and implications of the L2 motivational self-system in a Catalan EFL context. In MagidM.CsizérK. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 377–402). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
44.
MagidM.ChanL. (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualize their ideal L2 self: Lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 113–125.
45.
MartinezR.SchmittN. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33, 299–320.
46.
NagyW.E.AndersonR.C.HermanP.A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.
47.
NationP. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PaivioA. (2010). Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 205–230.
49.
PapiM. (2018). Motivation as quality: Regulatory fit effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 707–730.
50.
PapiM.AbdollahzadehE. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning, 62, 571–594.
51.
Pellicer-SánchezA. (2015). Developing automaticity and speed of lexical access: the effects of incidental and explicit teaching approaches. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2, 126–139.
52.
Pellicer-SánchezA. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.
53.
Pellicer-SánchezA.BoersF. (2019). Pedagogical approaches to the teaching and learning of formulaic language. In Siyanova-ChanturiaA.Pellicer-SánchezA. (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 153–173). New York: Routledge.
54.
PetersE. (2012). Learning German formulaic sequences: the effect of two attention-drawing techniques. The Language Learning Journal, 40, 65–79.
55.
PetersE.PauwelsP. (2015). Learning academic formulaic sequences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 28–39.
56.
PintrichP.R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In ReynoldsW.M.MillerG.E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology: Volume 7 (pp. 103–122). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57.
PuimègeE.PetersE. (2019) Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: An exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, 47, 424–438.
58.
SagarraN.AlbaM. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 228–243.
59.
SampsonR. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16, 317–335.
SchmittN. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In SchmittN.McCarthyM. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SchmittN. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.
63.
SchmittN. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
64.
StengersH.BoersF.HousenA.EyckmansJ. (2010). Does chunking foster chunk uptake? In De KnopS.BoersF.De RyckerA. (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 99–117). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
65.
SzudarskiP. (2012). Effects of meaning- and formed-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb–noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1, 3–37.
66.
SzudarskiP.CarterR. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 245–265.
67.
TaylorS.E.PhamL.B.RivkinI.D.ArmorD.A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American Psychologist, 53, 429–439.
68.
TremblayP.F.GoldbergM.P.GardnerR.C. (1995). Trait and state motivation and the acquisition of Hebrew vocabulary. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 27, 356–370.
69.
TsengW.T.SchmittN. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58, 357–400.
70.
TsengW.T.DörnyeiZ.SchmittN. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78–102.
71.
UshiodaE. (2016). Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 49, 564–577.
72.
WebbS.ChangA.C. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading with audio support: How do frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning?Language Teaching Research, 19, 667–686.
73.
WebbS.KagimotoE. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 55–77.
74.
WebbS.NationP. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
WebbS.NewtonJ.ChangA. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91–120.
76.
WoodD. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
77.
WrayA. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
