Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article reports a classroom-based study of the effects of two types of corrective feedback (CF) on the acquisition of 3rd person -s. One hundred and nine Chinese university students completed three communicative tasks: One group received implicit CF consisting of a single corrective move (implicit recasts), a second group received explicit CF consisting of a dual corrective move (a prompt followed by a more explicit recast), a third group performed the tasks without feedback, and a control group just completed two tests. The groups completed two pre-tests, immediate post-tests and delayed post-tests. Gains in accuracy in a test of procedural knowledge (an elicited imitation test) and in a test of declarative knowledge (an untimed grammaticality judgement test) were evident in the first three groups but with few differences among the test scores of these groups. No gains occurred in the test control group. Explicit feedback involving a dual feedback move elicited more uptake-with-repair but this was unrelated to gains in accuracy and overall the implicit CF involving a single feedback move was as effective as the explicit. This finding, which was unexpected, may reflect the Chinese learners’ general orientation to form in this particular classroom context.

Keywords

classroom research grammar acquisition implicit and explicit corrective feedback noticing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ammar

Spada

(2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.

Bardovi-Harlig

(2018). Concept-oriented analysis: A reflection on one approach to studying interlanguage development. In Gudmestad

Edmonds

(Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 171–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Carroll

(2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Carroll

Swain

(1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357–386.

Doughty

C.J.

Varela

(1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty

Williams

(Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Egi

(2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94, 1–21.

Ellis

(2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.

Ellis

(2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis

(2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.

10.

Ellis

(2006). Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Appied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.

11.

Ellis

(2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Mackey

(Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Ellis

Shintani

(2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. London: Routledge.

13.

Ellis

Basturkmen

Loewen

(2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.

14.

Ellis

Loewen

Erlam

(2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368.

15.

Goo

(2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 445–474.

16.

Han

(2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572.

17.

Havranek

Cesnik

(2003). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In Foster- Cohen

Nizegorodzew

(Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 1 (pp. 99–122). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

18.

Kim

Mathes

(2001). Explicit vs. implicit corrective feedback. The Korea TESOL Journal, 4, 1–15.

19.

Leeman

(2003). Recasts and L2 development: beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63.

20.

(2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.

21.

Loewen

Philp

(2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.

22.

Loewen

Erlam

Ellis

(2009). The incidental acquisition of 3rd person -s as implicit and explicit knowledge. In Ellis

Loewen

Erlam

Elder

Philp

Reinders

(Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and Teaching (pp. 262–280). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

23.

Long

(1983). Native-speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141.

24.

Long

(1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie

Bhatia

(Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

25.

Long

M.H.

(2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

26.

Lyster

(1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 55–85.

27.

Lyster

(2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.

28.

Lyster

Izquierdo

(2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453–498.

29.

Lyster

Ranta

(1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.

30.

Lyster

Saito

(2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.

31.

Mackey

Goo

J.M.

(2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey

(Ed.), Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning (pp. 379–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

32.

Muranoi

(2000). Focus-on-form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617–673.

33.

Nassaji

(2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411–452.

34.

Nassaji

(2015). The interactional dimension in instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury.

35.

Pica

(1983). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69–78.

36.

Sanz

(2003). Computer delivered implicit vs. explicit feedback in processing instruction. In VanPatten

(Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 241–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

37.

Schmidt

(1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.

38.

Schmidt

(2001). Attention. In Robinson

(Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Sheen

(2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey

(Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

40.

Suzuki

DeKeyser

R.M.

(2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 860–895.

41.

Varnosfadrani

Basturkmen

(2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37, 82–98.

42.

Yilmaz

(2011). The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62, 1134–1169.

43.

Yilmaz

(2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368.

44.

Yilmaz

(2016). The role of exposure condition in the effectiveness of explicit correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 65–96.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material