García MayoM.P.Villarreal OlaizolaI. (2011). The development of suppletive and affixal tense and agreement morphemes in the L3 English of Basque–Spanish bilinguals. Second Language Research, 27, 129–149.
2.
JohnsT.F. (1986). Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System, 14, 151–162.
3.
KeckC.M.Iberri-SheaG.Tracy-VenturaN.Wa-MbalekaS. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In OrtegaL.NorrisJ. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4.
KelloggR.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
MackeyA.GooJ. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 408–452). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Martínez AdriánM.Gutierrez MangadoJ. (2015). Is CLIL instruction beneficial in terms of general proficiency and specific areas of grammar?Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 3, 51–76.
7.
RobinsonP. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis on language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8.
SkehanP. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.
