The language learner strategies research field has often tried to identify the good language learner (GLL) by distinguishing more proficient from less proficient learners. However the notion of ‘good’ may be problematic without taking into account an individual’s linguistic knowledge (LK). This article foregrounds LK in relation to strategy use in the context of ‘listening to the teacher’: a language use task relatively under-researched. Secondary school students in Hong Kong (n = 646) completed a questionnaire and tests of LK including vocabulary and grammar. Lower LK learners reported using more translation strategies, whereas those with higher LK reported using a range of additional strategies. A further cluster analysis, however, indicated that a sub-group of lower LK learners were comparably strategic with the higher LK group perhaps compensating for low LK via strategy deployment. This article provides evidence that strategy deployment when listening to the teacher is not wholly constrained by levels of LK. Pedagogical implications are suggested.
AndersonN.J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 460–472.
2.
BachmanL.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BirdsongD. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer.
4.
BriggsJ.G. (2015). A context-specific research tool to probe the out-of-class vocabulary-related strategies of study-abroad learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25, 291–314.
5.
CanaleM.SwainM. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
6.
ChamotA.U.El-DinaryP.B. (1999). Children’s learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319–338.
7.
ChienC.N.LiW. (1998). The strategy use in listening comprehension for EFL learners in Taiwan. RELC Journal, 29, 66–91.
8.
ChouM.H. (2015). The influence of topics on listening strategy use for English for academic purposes. English Language Teaching, 8, 44–54.
9.
ClarkeM.A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121–150.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edition.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
12.
DongJ. (2016). A dynamic systems theory approach to development of listening strategy use and listening performance. System, 63, 149–165.
13.
EllisR. (1991). Grammaticality judgements and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161–186.
14.
EllisR. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
15.
FungD. (2016). Comprehension strategies when listening to the teacher in the ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford, UK.
16.
GohC.C.M. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 124–147.
17.
GohC.C.M. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30, 185–206.
18.
GrahamS. (1997). Effective language teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19.
GrahamS.SantosD. (2015). Strategies for second language listening. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GrahamS.SantosD.VanderplankR. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36, 52–68.
21.
GrahamS.SantosD.VanderplankR. (2010). Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 1–20.
22.
GrahamS.SantosD.VanderplankR. (2011). Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use. Language Teaching Research, 15, 435–456.
23.
GriffithsC. (Ed.). (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GriffithsC. (2018). The strategy factor in successful language learning: The Tornado effect. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
25.
GuY. (2014). To code or not to code: Dilemmas in analysing think-aloud protocols in learning strategies research. System, 43, 74–81.
HsiaoT.Y.OxfordR.L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language Journal, 86, 368–383.
28.
LiJ.J. (2009). ‘I know the word meaning but in Chinese’: The validity and implications of bilingual vocabulary tests. In EdwardesM. (Ed.), 41st Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics (BAAL) (pp. 75–76). London: Scitsiugnil Press.
29.
LoY.Y.MacaroE. (2012). The medium of instruction and classroom interaction: Evidence from Hong Kong secondary schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 29–52.
30.
LoY.Y.MurphyV.A. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge and growth in immersion and regular language-learning programmes in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 24, 215–238.
31.
LongD.R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65–80.
32.
MacaroE. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms. London: Continuum.
33.
MacaroE. (2010). The relationship between strategic behaviour and language learning success. In MacaroE. (Ed.), The continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 268–299). London: Continuum.
34.
MecarttyF.H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323–348.
35.
MorissetteL.ChartierS. (2013). The k-means clustering technique: General considerations and implementation in mathematica. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9, 15–24.
36.
MurphyJ.M. (1985). An investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, New York. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED278275 (August2019).
37.
NaimanN.FröhlichM.SternH.H.TodescoA. (1978). The good language learner. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
38.
NakataniY. (2006). Developing an Oral Communication Strategy Inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 151–168.
39.
NationI.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.
40.
NationI.S.P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.
O’MalleyJ.M.ChamotA.U.KüpperL. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418–437.
43.
O’MalleyJ.M.ChamotA.U.Stewner-ManzanaresG.KüpperL.RussoR.P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginner and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.
44.
OxfordR.L.Burry-StockJ.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23, 1–23.
45.
PanY.C.TsaiT.H.HuangY.K.LiuD. (2018). Effects of expanded vocabulary support on L2 listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 22, 189–207.
46.
RubinJ. (1975). What the ‘Good Language Learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.
47.
SağlamS. (2014). The role of vocabulary breadth, syntactic knowledge, and listening strategy use on listening comprehension. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 1, 54–72.
48.
TaguchiN. (2001). L2 learners’ strategic mental processes during a listening test. JALT Journal, 23, 176–201.
49.
TakeuchiO.IkedaM.MizumotoA. (2012). The cerebral basis for language learner strategies: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24, 136–157.
50.
TanP.N.SteinbachM.KumarV. (2006). Introduction to data mining. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
51.
TsuiA.B.M. (1985). Analyzing input and interaction in second language classrooms. RELC Journal, 16, 8–32.
52.
TsuiA.B.M.FulliloveJ. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics, 19, 432–451.
53.
Van ZeelandH. (2014). Lexical inferencing in first and second language listening. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 1006–1021.
54.
VandergriftL. (1998). Successful and less successful listeners in French: What are the strategy differences?The French Review, 71, 370–395.
55.
VandergriftL. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496.
56.
VandergriftL.GohC.C.M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.
57.
WangY.Treffers-DallerJ. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150.
58.
YeldhamM. (2017). Developing a framework for investigating L2 listeners’ longitudinal development. IRAL, 55, 1–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
