This quasi-experimental classroom study examines the effects of recasts and negotiated prompts on oral interactions in a foreign language (FL) context where the instructional approach primarily focuses on grammar and accuracy. Ninety adult native speakers of Mandarin Chinese from two intact classes were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups (recast or negotiated prompt) or a control group, and were asked to complete pre-/post-tests on their use of question and past tense forms in English. Between the pre-test and the post-tests, the learners of the two experimental groups had three treatment lessons for feedback outside their usual English classes, the interaction data of which are reported. ANOVA analyses revealed that recasts were highly effective for accuracy development of wh-questions, interrogative questions and irregular past tense verbs. Negotiated prompts showed moderate effectiveness at most times for accuracy development of interrogative questions and both irregular and regular past tense verbs. These findings provide further insights into the role of corrective feedback (CF) in L2 development.
AmmarA.SpadaN. (2006). Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
2.
AndersonJ.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AndersonJ.R. (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley.
4.
BatstoneR. (2002). Contexts of engagement: A discourse perspective on ‘intake’ and ‘pushed output’. System, 30, 1–14.
5.
ChenQ.KlenowskiV. (2009). Assessment and curriculum reform in China: The college English test and tertiary English as a foreign language education. In Proceedings of the 2008 AARE International Education Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
6.
CollentineJ.FreedB.F. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153–171.
7.
CortazziM.JinL. (1996a). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In ColemanH. (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CortazziM.JinL. (1996b). English teaching and learning in China. Language Teaching, 29, 61–80.
9.
CortazziM.JinL. (2001). Large classes in China: ‘Good’ teachers and interaction. In WatkinsD.A.BiggsJ.B. (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 115–134). Camberwell, VIC / Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, the University of Hong Kong.
10.
DeKeyserR. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DoughtyC. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125–151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EllisN. (2004). The processes of second language acquisition. In VanPattenB.WilliamsJ.RottS.OverstreetM. (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 49–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
EllisR. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 18–41.
14.
EllisR. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
EllisR.BasturkmenH.LoewenS. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.
16.
GooJ.MackeyA. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127–165.
17.
GoochR.SaitoK.LysterR. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners. System, 60, 117–127.
18.
HanZ. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572.
19.
HanZ.KimJ.H. (2008). Corrective recasts: What teachers might want to know. Language Learning Journal, 36, 35–44.
20.
JinL.CortazziM. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: Large classes in China. Interactional Journal of Educational Research, 29, 739–761.
21.
LeemanJ. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63.
22.
LiS. (2010). The effectiveness of CF in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
23.
LiuM.XuW.RanQ. (2015). An empirical study of writing feedback analysis of non-English majors in China with natural language processing technologies. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 5, 85–93.
24.
LoewenS.NabeiT. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
LoewenS.PhilpJ. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.
26.
LongM. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In RitchieW.BhatiaT. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
LongM. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
LysterR. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 55–85.
29.
LysterR. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
30.
LysterR. (2015). The relative effectiveness of corrective feedback in classroom interaction. In MarkeeN. (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 213–228). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
LysterR.IzquierdoJ. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453–498.
32.
LysterR.MoriH. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.
33.
LysterR.RantaL. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in CF research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 167–184.
34.
LysterR.SaitoK.SatoM. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.
35.
MackeyA. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.
36.
MackeyA.PhilpJ. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.
37.
McDonoughK. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learner’s responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103.
38.
McDonoughK.MackeyA. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720.
39.
Mifka-ProfozicN. (2013). The effectiveness of corrective feedback and the role of individual differences in language learning. Frankfurt/Mein: Peter Lang.
40.
NicholasH.LightbownP.SpadaN. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.
41.
PallantJ. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 4th edition.Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
42.
PhilpJ. (2003). Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NN–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126.
43.
PicaT. (1983). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69–78.
44.
RobinsonP. (Ed.). (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
RussellJ.SpadaN. (2006). The effectiveness of CF for second language acquisition. In NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 131–164). Philadelphia, PA / Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
47.
SchmidtR. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.
48.
SchmidtR. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In SchmidtR.W. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i.
49.
SheenY. (2004). CF and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263–300.
50.
SheenY. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.
51.
SpadaN.LightbownP.M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205–224.
52.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.M.MaddenC. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
53.
SwainM. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In CookC.SeidlhoferB. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
SwainM. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
van de GuchteM.BraaksmaM.RijlaarsdamG.BimmelP. (2015). Learning new grammatical structures in task-based language learning: The effects of recasts and prompts. Modern Language Journal, 99, 246–262.
56.
VanPattenB. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
57.
VanPattenB.WilliamsJ.RottS. (2004). Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition. In VanPattenB.WilliamsJ.RottS.OverstreetM. (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 1–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
YangY.LysterR. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
