This quantitative study examines whether and to what extent affective factors (i.e. motivation, self-confidence, risk-taking, L2 speaking anxiety, and grit) and virtual intercultural experiences are linked to willingness to communicate in a second language (L2 WTC) in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Participants included 176 Korean undergraduate and graduate students of English as a foreign language (EFL). After adjusting for demographic factors, hierarchical regression analyses revealed three major results: first, those with higher levels of L2 motivation and grit as well as a lower level of L2 speaking anxiety had higher L2 WTC inside the classroom. Second, students who majored in English and had higher levels of L2 self-confidence and risk-taking had higher L2 WTC outside the classroom. Third, individuals who were younger, had a higher level of L2 self-confidence and engaged more frequently in virtual intercultural experiences had higher L2 WTC in digital settings. Results suggest that demographic and affective variables as well as involvement in virtual intercultural activities play distinct roles in influencing EFL students’ WTC in three different L2 communication contexts. Based on these findings, this study provides pedagogical suggestions for L2 practitioners.
BaraltM.Gurzynski-WeissL. (2011). Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15, 201–229.
2.
BartlettM.S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various X2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16, 296–298.
3.
BuckinghamL.AlpaslanR.S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37.
4.
CaoY. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468–479.
5.
CaoY. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789–814.
6.
CattellR.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
7.
ChaJ.-S.KimT.-Y. (2013). Effects of English-learning motivation and language anxiety of the elementary school students on willingness to communicate in English and English speaking. Primary English Education, 19, 271–294.
8.
ChenG.-M. (2012). The impact of new media on intercultural communication in global context. China Media Research, 8, 1–10.
9.
CredéM.TynanM.C.HarmsP.D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 492–511.
10.
DeniesK.YashimaT.JanssenR. (2015). Classroom versus societal willingness to communicate: investigating French as a second language in Flanders. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 718–739.
11.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237–274.
12.
DewaeleJ.-M.WitneyJ.SaitoK.DewaeleL. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22, 676–697.
13.
DörnyeiZ.CsizérK. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2, 203–229.
14.
DörnyeiZ.KormosJ. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300.
15.
DörnyeiZ.MurpheyT. (2009). Group dynamics in language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DuckworthA.L. (2017). Grit: Why passion and resilience are the secrets to success. London: Penguin Random House.
17.
DuckworthA.L.QuinnP.D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174.
18.
DuckworthA.L.PetersonC.MatthewsM.KellyD. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
19.
ElyC.M. (1986). An analysis of discomfort, risktaking, sociability, and motivation in the L2 classroom. Language Learning, 36, 1–25.
20.
FabrigarL.R.WegenerD.T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis (understanding statistics). New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
FinchJ.FWestS.G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439–485.
22.
FreiermuthM.R.HuangH.-C. (2012). Bringing Japan and Taiwan closer electronically: A look at an intercultural online synchronic chat task and its effect on motivation. Language Teaching Research, 16, 61–88.
23.
FriedmanT. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24.
HairJ.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L.BlackW.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. 4th edition.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.
HashimotoY. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: the Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20, 29–70.
26.
HorwitzE.K. (2016). Factor structure of the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale: Comment on Park (2014). Psychological Reports, 119, 71–76.
27.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
28.
JungY.KimY.LeeH., et al. (2017). Learner perception of multimodal synchronous computer-mediated communication in foreign language classrooms. Language Teaching Research. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 1 November 2017 (doi: 10.1177/1362168817731910).
29.
KaiserH.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
30.
KangD.-M. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319–332.
31.
KangS.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33, 277–292.
32.
KeI.-C.CahyaniH. (2014). Learning to become users of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): How ELF online communication affects Taiwanese learners’ beliefs of English. System, 46, 28–38.
33.
KhajavyG.H.GhonsoolyB.FatemiA.H.ChoiC.W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 154–180.
34.
KikuchiK. (2009). Listening to our learners’ voices: what demotivates Japanese high school students?Language Teaching Research, 13, 453–471.
35.
KormosJ.PréfontaineY. (2017). Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks. Language Teaching Research, 21, 699–716.
36.
LeeJ.S. (2018). Informal digital learning of English and English learning outcomes. Paper presented at TESOL 2018 International Convention and English Language Expo, Chicago, Illinois.
37.
LeeJ.S.LeeK. (2018). Informal digital learning of English and English as an international language: The path less traveled. British Journal of Educational Technology. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 29 August 2018 (doi:10.1111/bjet.12652).
38.
LeeJ.S.LeeK. (2019). Perceptions of English as an international language by Korean English-major and non-English-major students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40, 76–89.
39.
LefkowitzN.HedgcockJ. (2002). Sound barriers: Influences of social prestige, peer pressure and teacher (dis)approval on FL oral performance. Language Teaching Research, 6, 223–244.
40.
MacintyreP.D.CharosC. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3–26.
41.
MacIntyreP.D.DörnyeiZ.ClémentR.NoelsK. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
42.
MackL. (2012). Does every student have a voice? Critical action research on equitable classroom participation practices. Language Teaching Research, 16, 417–434.
43.
MatsudaA. (Ed.). (2017). Preparing teachers to teach English as an international language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
44.
McCroskeyJ.C. (1978). Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension. Communication Monographs, 45, 192–203.
45.
NationP. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 2–13.
46.
ParkG.P. (2014). Factor analysis of the foreign language classroom anxiety scale in Korean learners of English as a Foreign Language. Psychological Reports, 115, 261–275.
47.
PawlakM.Mystkowska-WiertelakA.BielakJ. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20, 654–671.
48.
PortoM.HoughtonS.A.ByramM. (2018). Intercultural citizenship in the (foreign) language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 22, 484–497.
49.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
50.
PyunD.O.KimJ.S.ChoH.Y.LeeJ.H. (2014). Impact of affective variables on Korean as a foreign language learners’ oral achievement. System, 47, 53–63.
51.
ReindersH.WattanaS. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 101–123.
52.
ReindersH.WattanaS. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27, 38–57.
53.
RichardsJ.C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46, 5–22.
54.
SamimyK.K.TabuseM. (1992). Affective variables and a less commonly taught language: A study in beginning Japanese classes. Language Learning, 42, 377–398.
55.
SauroS. (2017). Online fan practices and CALL. CALICO Journal, 34, 131–146.
56.
YashimaT. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66.
57.
YashimaT.MacIntyreP.D.IkedaM. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22, 115–137.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
