This study compared the effectiveness of deductive instruction and guided inductive instruction for developing semantic radical knowledge of Chinese characters. The evaluation was conducted through a quasi-experimental 3-week intervention involving 46 intermediate learners of Chinese as a foreign language (CFL). The results indicated that guided inductive instruction generated significantly greater gains in learners’ use of radical information for radical form-meaning mapping and for Chinese character recognition and inferencing. This study further found that the effectiveness of inductive instruction in strengthening radical form-meaning mapping varied for semantic radicals of different complexity levels. These findings suggest that instructors should apply guided induction in teaching semantic radicals, but also be flexible in varying instruction in response to the complexity of semantic radicals. The findings suggest that the inductive-deductive nature of instruction and the complexity of semantic radicals are important variables to consider in future research on the learning and instruction of Chinese characters.
Adair-HauckB.DonatoR.Cumo-JohanssenP. (2005). Using a story-based approach to teach grammar. In ShrumJ.L.GlisanE.W. (Eds.), Teacher’s handbook: Contextualizing language instruction. (pp. 189–213). 3rd edition.Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
2.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of memory and language, 68, 255–278.
3.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4: R package version 1.1–7. 2014.
4.
CerezoL.CarasA.LeowR.P. (2016). The effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish gustar structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265–291.
5.
ChangL.Y.XuY.PerfettiC.A.ZhangJ.ChenH.-C. (2014). Supporting orthographic learning at the beginning stage of learning to read Chinese as a second language. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 61, 289–306.
6.
ChenC.TruscottJ. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 693–713.
7.
ChenH.-C.ChangL.-Y.ChiouY.-S.SungY.-T.ChangK.-E. (2011). Chinese orthography database and its application in teaching Chinese characters. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43, 269–290.
8.
ChenM.J.WeekesB.S. (2004). Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46, 181–196.
9.
ChenY.PengD.L. (1994). A connectionist model of Chinese character recognition and naming. In ChangH.W.HuangJ.T.HueC.W.TzengO.J.L. (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing: Volume 1 (pp. 211–240). Taipei: Department of Psychology, Taiwan University.
10.
DeFrancisJ. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
11.
DeKeyserR.M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410.
12.
DeKeyserR.M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1–25.
13.
DeKeyserR. (2016). Of moving targets and chameleons: Why the concept of difficulty is so hard to pin down. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 353–363.
14.
DunlapS.PerfettiC.A.LiuY.WuS.M. (2011). Learning vocabulary in Chinese as a foreign language: Effects of explicit instruction and semantic cue reliability. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. Available at: http://www2.pitt.edu/~perfetti/PDF/DunlapLearningVocabulary.pdf (accessed September 2018).
15.
ErlamR. (2003). Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured-input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 559–582.
16.
EversonM.E. (2011). Best practices in teaching logographic and non-Roman writing systems to L2 learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 249–274.
17.
FanK.Y.GaoJ.Y.AoX.P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing scripts. Chinese Character Reform, 3, 23–27.
18.
FanS.I.WeekesB.S. (2007). Effects of frequency and semantic radical combinability on reading in Chinese: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 103, 111–112.
19.
FeldmanL.B.SiokW.W. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559–576.
20.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HaightC.E.HerronC.ColeS.P. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 288–310.
22.
HerronC.TomaselloM. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. The French Review, 65, 708–718.
23.
HoosainR. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In ChenH.C.TzengO.J.L. (Eds.), Advances in psychology: Volume 90 (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24.
HousenA.SimoensH. (2016). Introduction: Cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 163–175.
25.
HsiaoJ.H.W.ShillcockR.LavidorM. (2006). A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition. Brain Research, 1078, 159–167.
26.
HulstijnJ.de GraaffR. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97–112.
27.
KeC. (1996). An empirical study on the relationship between Chinese character recognition and production. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 340–349.
28.
KuoL.J.LiY.SadoskiM.KimT.J. (2014). Acquisition of Chinese characters: The effects of character properties and individual differences among learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 287–300.
29.
LawS.P.YumY.N.CheungG.W.L. (2017). Neural correlates of concreteness effect in semantic processing of single Chinese characters using mixed-effects modeling. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 223–238.
30.
LinckJ.A.CunningsI. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65, 185–207.
31.
LüC.KodaK.ZhangD.ZhangY. (2015). Effects of semantic radical properties on character meaning extraction and inference among learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Writing Systems Research, 7, 169–185.
32.
MasraiA.MiltonJ. (2015). An investigation of the relationship between L1 lexical translation equivalence and L2 vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5, 1–7.
33.
MoriY. (2014). Review of recent research on kanji processing, learning, and instruction. Japanese Language and Literature, 48, 403–430.
PackardJ.L.ChenX.LiW., et al. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 457–487.
36.
ShenH.H. (2010). Imagery and verbal coding approaches in Chinese vocabulary instruction. Language Teaching Research, 14, 485–499.
37.
ShuH.ChenX.AndersonR.C.WuN.XuanY. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.
38.
SmartJ. (2014). The role of guided induction in paper-based data-driven learning. ReCALL, 26, 184–201.
39.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
40.
SuX.KimY.S. (2014). Semantic radical knowledge and word recognition in Chinese for Chinese as foreign language learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26, 131–152.
41.
TagarelliK.M.RuizS.VegaJ.L.M.RebuschatP. (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 293–316.
42.
TongX.TongX.McBrideC. (2017). Radical sensitivity is the key to understanding Chinese character acquisition in children. Reading and Writing, 30, 1251–1265.
43.
VogelS.HerronC.ColeS.P.YorkH. (2011). Effectiveness of a guided inductive versus a deductive approach on the learning of grammar in the intermediate level college French classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 353–380.
44.
WangM.LiuY.PerfettiC.A. (2004). The implicit and explicit learning of orthographic structure and function of a new writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 357–379.
45.
WilliamsC.BeverT. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias?Reading and Writing, 23, 589–605.
46.
XuY.ChangL.Y.PerfettiC.A. (2014). The effect of radical-based grouping in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 773–793.
47.
YeungP.S.HoC.S.H.ChanD.W.O.ChungK.K.H. (2016). Orthographic skills important to Chinese literacy development: The role of radical representation and orthographic memory of radicals. Reading and Writing, 29, 1935–1958.
48.
YeungP.S.HoC. S. H.WongY. K., et al. (2013). Longitudinal predictors of Chinese word reading and spelling among elementary grade students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1245–1277.
49.
Y.N. (1958). 常用汉字笔画统计 [Stroke numbers of commonly used Chinese characters]. Character Reform, 文字改革, 3, 51.
50.
ZhangP. (1992). 词本位教学法和字本位教学法的比较 [Comparison of cibenwei and zibenwei teaching approaches]. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 222–223.
51.
ZhangJ.J.WangJ.ChenX.K. (2014). 义符研究 20 年: 理论探讨, 实验证据和加工模型 [Twenty years of research on semantic radicals: Theoretical discussions, empirical evidence and processing models]. Psychological Science Advancement, 心理科学进展, 22, 381–399.
52.
ZhouY. (1978). 现代汉字中声旁的表音问题 [Issues regarding the phonetic radicals in modern Chinese characters]. Chinese Linguistics, 中国语文, 3, 173–177.
