Demotivation (Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2011) and non-participation (Norton, 2001) characterize negative responses to classroom practice of a generally chronic nature. In this article, focus is directed to negativity that emerges within the context of a particular language developing activity, and which can be understood as a situated response to the activity’s demands. In conceptualizing negative responses at the activity level, disaffection – the negative face of engagement – is a construct of central importance. Drawing on data from a large-scale ethnographic project in secondary English classrooms in Sweden, in this exploratory case study disaffection (Skinner, 2016) is examined in the context of two language developing activities. Analyses reveal that disaffection can transform into active engagement, and that when called upon to perform an inauthentic identity, students can ‘redesign’ activities in ways that enable them to act authentically.
AndermanE.M.PatrickH. (2012). Achievement goal theory, conceptualization of ability/ intelligence, and classroom climate. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 173–192). New York: Springer.
2.
CanagarajahA.S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
DarvinR. (2020). L2 motivation and investment. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 245–264). Houndmills: Palgrave.
4.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
5.
DörnyeiZ. (2020). From integrative motivation to directed motivational currents: The evolution of understanding L2 motivation over 3 decades. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 39–69). Houndmills: Palgrave.
6.
DörnyeiZ.MuirC. (2019). Creating a motivating classroom environment. In GaoX.A. (Ed.), Springer international handbooks of education: Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 719–736). New York: Springer.
7.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. 2nd edition.Harlow: Pearson.
8.
DuffP.A. (2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 1–23.
9.
DuffP.A. (2017). Social dimensions and differences in instructed SLA. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 379–396). New York: Routledge.
10.
EllisR. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–349.
11.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
12.
FredricksJ.A.McColskeyW. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York: Springer.
13.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
14.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
15.
HanY.HylandF. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44.
16.
HenryA. (2019). Online media creation and L2 motivation: a socially-situated perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 372–404.
17.
HenryA.KorpH.SundqvistP.ThorsenC. (2018). Motivational strategies and the reframing of English: Activity design and challenges for teachers in contexts of extensive extramural encounters. TESOL Quarterly, 52, 247–273.
18.
HenryA.ThorsenC. (2018a). Teacher-student relationships and L2 motivation. Modern Language Journal102, 218–241.
19.
HenryA.ThorsenC. (2018b). Teachers’ self-disclosures and influences on students’ motivation: A relational perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1441261
20.
HenryA.ThorsenC. (2019). Weaving webs of connection: Empathy, perspective taking, and students’ motivation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 31–53.
21.
KramschC. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
LantolfJ.P.PavlenkoA. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity: Understanding learners as people. In BreenM. (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). London: Pearson.
23.
MercerS.DörnyeiZ. (2020). Engaging students in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MillerE.R. (2015). Power, resistance and second language learning. In MarkeeN. (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 461–474). Chichester: John Wiley.
25.
NortonB. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom. In BreenM. (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 159–171). London: Pearson.
26.
NortonB. (2013). Identity, language and language learning: Extending the conversation. Toronto, ON: Multilingual Matters.
27.
Norton PeirceB. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9–31.
28.
PetersonC.MaierS.F.SeligmanM.E.P. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
PhilpJ.DuchesneS. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.
30.
ReeveJ. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer.
31.
ReeveJ.TsengC.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267.
32.
RothD.SnyderC.R.PaceL. (1986). Dimensions of favorable self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 867–874.
33.
ShernoffD.J.KellyS.TonksS.M., et al. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60.
34.
SkinnerE. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In WentzelK.R.MieleD.B. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 145–168). New York: Routledge.
35.
SkinnerE.A.KindermannT.A.ConnellJ.P.WellbornJ.G. (2009a). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In WentzelK.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223–245). Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
SkinnerE.A.KindermannT.A.FurrerC.J. (2009b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
37.
SkinnerE.A.PitzerJ.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York: Springer.
38.
StakeR. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
39.
SvalbergA.M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18, 242–258.
40.
SvalbergA.M.-L. (2018). Researching language engagement: Current trends and future directions. Language Awareness, 27, 21–39.
41.
ThorneS. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal, 89, 393–409.
42.
TracyK.RoblesJ.S. (2013). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guildford Press.
43.
van LierL. (2013). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. New York: Routledge.
44.
VanniniP. (2006). ‘Dead Poets’ Society: Teaching, publish-or-perish, and professors’ experience of authenticity. Symbolic Interaction, 29, 235–258.
45.
VanniniP.BurgessS. (2009). Authenticity as motivation and aesthetic experience. In VanniniP.WilliamsJ.P. (Eds.), Authenticity in culture, self and society (pp. 103–120). Farnham: Ashgate.
46.
VanniniP.FranzeseA. (2008). The authenticity of self: Conceptualization, personal experience, and practice. Sociology Compass, 5, 1621–1637.
47.
WebbL.TempleN. (2016) Social media and gender issues. In GuzzettiB.LesleyM. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media (pp. 638–669). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
48.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
