Task-based language teaching (TBLT) and task-supported language teaching (TSLT) are often seen as incompatible as they draw on different theories of language learning and language teaching. The position adopted in this article, however, is that both approaches are needed especially in instructional contexts where ‘pure’ task-based teaching may be problematic for various reasons. The article makes a case for a modular curriculum consisting of separate (i.e. non-integrated) task-based and structure-based components. Different curriculum models are considered in the light of what is known about how a second language is learned. The model that is proposed assumes the importance of developing fluency first. It consists of a primary task-based module implemented with focus-on-form (Long, 1991) and, once a basic fluency has been achieved, supported by a secondary structural module to provide for explicit accuracy-oriented work to counteract learned selective attention (N. Ellis, 2006): one of the main sources of persistent error. The article also addresses the content and grading of the task-based and structural modules. It considers the factors that need to be considered in the vertical and horizontal grading of tasks but also points out that, for the time being, syllabus designers will have to draw on their experience and intuition as much as on research to make decisions about how to sequence tasks. An argument is presented for treating the structural component as a checklist rather than as a syllabus so as to allow teachers to address selectively those features that are found to be problematic for their students when they perform tasks.
BachmanL.PalmerA. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BrumfitC. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CameronL. (2001). Teaching languages to young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
DayE.ShapsonS. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 25–58.
5.
DeKeyserR. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DeKeyserR. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.
7.
DeKeyserR. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPattenB.WilliamsJ. (Eds), Theories of second language acquisition (2nd edition, pp. 91–112). New York: Routledge.
8.
De RidderI.VangehuchtenL.Sesena GomazM. (2007). Enhancing automaticity through task-based language learning. Applied Linguistics, 28, 309–315.
9.
DoughtyC.VarelaE. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DuranG.RamautG. (2006). Tasks for absolute beginners and beyond: Developing and sequencing tasks at basic proficiency levels. In Van den BrandenK. (Ed.). Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 47–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
EckerthJ. (2008). Task-based language learning and teaching: Old wine in new bottles? In EckerthJ.SickmannS. (Eds), Task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 13–46). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
12.
EllisN. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.
13.
EllisN. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.
14.
EllisR. (1984). Formulaic speech in early classroom second language development. In HandscombeJ.OremR.TaylorB. (Eds), On TESOL’83: The question of context (pp. 53–66). Washington, DC: TESOL.
15.
EllisR. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113.
16.
EllisR. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In EllisN. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 79–114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
EllisR. (2002). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In HinkelE.FotosS. (Eds), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 14–34). London: Routledge.
18.
EllisR. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.
19.
EllisR. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. 2nd edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
EllisR. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.
21.
EllisR. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20, 405–428.
22.
EstaireS.ZanonJ. (1994). Planning classwork: A task-based approach. Oxford: Heinemann.
23.
FotosS.EllisR. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605–628.
24.
González-LloretM.NielsonK. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19, 525–549.
25.
HallidayM. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
26.
HanZ.H. (2014). From Julie to Wes to Alberto: Revisiting the construct of fossilization. In HanZ.-H.TaroneE. (Eds), Interlanguage: Forty years later (pp. 347–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27.
HarleyB. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 19, 331–359.
28.
HymesD. (1970). On communicative competence. In GumperzJ.J.HymesD. (Eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinchart & Winston.
29.
JacksonD.O.SuethanapornkulS. (2012). The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63, 330–367.
30.
JohnsonR.K.SwainM. (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KrashenS. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
32.
LewisM. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
33.
LiS.EllisR. (forthcoming). The influence of pre-task grammar instruction on task performance and L2 learning in task-supported language instruction: A process-product study.
34.
LittlewoodW. (2014). Communication-oriented teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?Language Teaching, 47, 249–362.
35.
LongM. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In HyltenstamK.PienemannM. (Eds), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
36.
LongM. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In BeebeL. (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37.
LongM. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In De BotK.GinsbergR.KramschC. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38.
LongM. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
LongM. (2016). In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33.
40.
LongM.CrookesK. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quaterly, 26, 207–228.
41.
LoschkyL.Bley-VromanR. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In CrookesG.GassS. (Eds), Tasks and language learning: integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
42.
LysterR. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
43.
MackeyA. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.
44.
MochizukiN.OrtegaL. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.
45.
NassajiH.FotosS. (2007). Current issues in form-focused instruction. In FotosS.NassajiH. (Eds), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 7–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
47.
PhilpJ.DuchesneS. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.
48.
PicaT. (2006). The essential role of negotiation in the communicative classroom. JALT Journal, 18, 241–268.
49.
PienemannM. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In HyltenstamK.PienemannM. (Eds), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 23–75). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
50.
PrabhuN.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
RobinsonP. (2010). Task-based language teaching: A review of the issues. Language Learning, 61, 1–36.
52.
RobinsonP. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53.
SasayamaS. (2016). Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 100, 231–254.
54.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–58.
55.
SeedhouseP. (1997). The case of the missing ‘no’; the relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547–583.
56.
SheenR. (1994). A critical analysis of the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 127–157.
57.
SheenR. (2006). Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. In HousenA.PierrardM. (Eds), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 271–310). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
58.
ShehadehA. (2005). Task-based learning and teaching: Theories and applications. In EdwardsC.WillisL. (Eds), Teachers exploring tasks (pp. 13–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
59.
ShintaniN. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60.
SkehanP. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
SoarsL.SoarsJ. (2013). New headway. Oxford: Oxford University press.
62.
SpadaN. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 137–161.
63.
SwanM. (2005). Legislating by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376–401.
64.
SwanM.WalterC. (1984). The Cambridge English course. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
65.
Van AvermaetP.GysenS. (2006). From needs to tasks. In Van den BrandenK. (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 17–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Van den BrandenK. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
WhiteR. (1988). The ELT curriculum, design, innovation and management. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
68.
WilkinsD. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
YalçinS.SpadaN. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 239–263.
70.
YaldenJ. (1983). The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon.
71.
YaldenJ. (1986). An interactive approach to syllabus design: The frameworks project. In BrumfitC. (Ed.), The practice of communicative teaching: EKT Documents 124 (pp. 25–38). Oxford: Pergamon and the British Council.
