This article reports findings from an investigation into how novice teachers’ classroom discursive practices were influenced by history-in-person processes. Thought-based and practice-based data sources of two novice teachers were analysed to understand how history is brought to the present through the minds and bodies of individuals as they are addressed by external forces. Findings suggested that one’s history-in-person interacts in complex and unpredictable ways with external factors and can result in contentious local practice. Thus, attention to both personal history and to institutional constraints must figure into interpretations of how novice teachers perform and how changing practice is approached.
AretxagaB. (2001). Engendering violence: Strip-searching of women in Northern Ireland. In HollandD.LaveJ. (Eds.), History in person (pp. 37–61). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
2.
BaileyK.M. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. In BaileyK.M.NunanD. (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BallD.L.ForzaniF.M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511.
4.
BorgS. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
5.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
CartierJ.L.SmithM.S.SteinM.K.RossD. (2013). Five practices for orchestrating task-based discussions in science. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8.
CrossR. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. Modern Language Journal, 94, 434–452.
9.
DavinK.J.TroyanF.J. (2015). Teacher candidates’ implementation of high leverage teaching practices: From the university classroom to the field site. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 124–142.
10.
EngeströmY. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamäkiR.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
FaloutJ. (2015). Past selves: Emerging motivational guides across temporal contexts. In KingJ. (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 47–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
FaloutJ. (2016). The dynamics of past selves in language laerning and well-being. In MacIntyreP.D.GregersenT.MercerS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 112–129). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
13.
FreemanD. (1993). Renaming experience/reconstructing practice: Developing new understandings of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 485–497.
14.
FreemanD. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. Language Teaching, 35, 1–13.
15.
GlisanE.DonatoR. (2017). Enacting the work of language instruction: High-leverage teaching practices. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL Press.
16.
GolombekP.R.JohnsonK.E. (2004). Narrative inquiry as a mediational space: Examining emotional and cognitive dissonance in second-language teachers’ development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 307–327.
17.
GregoryS. (2001). Placing the politics of black class formation. In HollandD.LaveJ. (Eds.), History in person (pp. 137–170). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
18.
HallJ.K.WalshM. (2002). Teacher–student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186–203.
19.
HlasA.C.HlasC.S. (2012). A review of high-leverage teaching practices: Making connections between mathematics and foreign languages. Foreign Language Annals, 45, S76–S97.
20.
HollandD.LaveJ. (2001). History in person: An introduction. In HollandD.LaveJ. (Eds.), History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities (pp. 3–33). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
21.
HollandD.LaveJ. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1–15.
22.
HollandD.LachicotteW.Jr.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Holt-ReynoldsD. (1992). Beliefs as relevant personal history-based prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 325–349.
24.
JohnsonK.E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10, 439–452.
25.
JohnsonK.E.GolombekP.R. (2002). Inquiry into experience: Teachers’ personal and professional growth. In JohnsonK.GolombekP. (Eds.), Teachers narrative inquiry as professional development (pp. 1–14). New York: Cambridge University Press.
JuzwikM.M.Borsheim-BlackC.CaughlanS.HeintzA. (2013). Inspiring dialogue: Talking to learn in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
KucanL.PalincsarA.S. (2013). Comprehension instruction through text-based discussion. Neward, DE: International Reading Association.
29.
LampertM.GrazianiF. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 491–509.
30.
LantolfJ.P.JohnsonK.E. (2007). Extending Firth and Wagner’s (1997) ontological perspective to L2 classroom praxis and teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 91, 877–892.
31.
LantolfJ.P.ThorneS.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
MercerS. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39, 427–436.
35.
MerriamS.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
NathanM.J.KnuthE.J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 175–207.
37.
NumrichC. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 131–151.
38.
NystrandM. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 392–412.
39.
PhippsS.BorgS. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380–390.
40.
RamanathanV. (2002). The politics of TESOL education: Writing, knowledge, critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.
41.
SeedhouseP.WalshS. (2010). Learning a second language through classroom interaction. In SeedhouseP.WalshS.JenksC. (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 127–146). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
SiryC.ZieglerG.MaxC. (2012). ‘Doing science’ through discourse-in-interaction: Young children’s science investigations at the early childhood level. Science Education, 96, 311–326.
43.
SmithM.S.SteinM.K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
44.
SwainM. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediation acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In LantolfJ.P. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
SwainM.LapkinS. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). London: Pearson Education Limited.
46.
SwainM.LapkinS.KnouziI.SuzukiW.BrooksL. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5–29.
47.
ThomsJ.J. (2012). Classroom discourse in foreign language classrooms: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 45, S8–S27.
48.
TroyanF.DavinK.J.DonatoR. (2013). Integration of the practice-based approach into teacher preparation programs: A work in progress. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 154–180.
49.
van LierL. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. New York: Longman.
50.
van LierL. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
51.
VargheseM.MorganB.JohnstonB.JohnsonK.A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 4, 21–44.
52.
WalshS. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.
53.
WarrenK.B. (2001). Indigenous activism across generations: An intimate social history of antiracism organizing in Guatemala. In LaveJ.HollandD. (Eds.), History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities (pp. 63–91). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
54.
YoungR.F. (2009). Discursive practice in language learning and teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
55.
YoungR.F. (2014). Trapped in the transcript. American Association of Applied Linguistics. Portland, OR.
56.
YoungR.F.AstaritaA.C. (2013). Practice theory in language learning. Language Learning, 63, 171–189.
