This article reports on a pedagogical project aimed at helping second language (L2) learners of English develop the ability to detect and appropriately interpret spoken sarcasm. The study used a pre- and posttest procedure to assess the development of learners’ ability to both detect sarcasm and impute appropriate speaker intentions and attitudes conveyed through sarcastic utterances as result of a 10-week instructional program. The study also used interviews to gauge changes in learners’ conceptual understanding of English sarcasm. Beyond improving learners’ ability in the L2, a side effect of the project was that learners reported an enhanced awareness of the use and functions of sarcasm in their first language (L1), Korean.
BoutonL.F. (1994a). Can non-native speakers’ skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In: BoutonL.F. (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning: Volume 5 (pp. 88–109). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
2.
BoutonL.F. (1994b). Conversational implicature in the second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 157–167.
3.
BoutonL.F. (1999). Developing non-native speaker skills in interpreting conversational implicatures in English: Explicit teaching can ease the process. In: HinkelE. (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 47–70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ChoiH.B. (1937). Urimalbon [The Korean language]. Seoul: Yeonhui School Press.
5.
ChoiH.B. (1971). Urimalbon [The Korean language]. Seoul: Jeong Eum Sa.
6.
EganK. (2002). Getting it wrong from the beginning: Our progressive inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Gal’perinP.Ia. (1989). Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, 27, 45–64.
8.
González-IbáñezR.MuresanS.WacholderN. (2011). Identifying sarcasm in twitter: A closer look. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 581–586). Portland, Oregon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
9.
GriceH.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: ColeP.MorganJ.L. (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
10.
HaenenJ. (2001). Outlining the teaching–learning process: Piotr Gal’perin’s contribution. Learning and Instruction, 11, 157–170.
11.
HanG. (2003). Hyeondae ulimalui baneobeob yeongu [Investigation of irony in modern Korean language]. Seoul: Yeoglag.
12.
HeoW. (1995). Isibsegi ulimalui hyeongtaelon [Korean morphology in the twentieth century]. Seoul: Sam Munhwasa.
13.
KimJ. (2014). How Korean EFL learners understand sarcasm in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 193–206.
14.
KimY.K. (1985). Hangyeol Kim Yoon Kyoung jeonjib [Hangyeol collected works of Kim Yoon Kyoung]. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
15.
KohY.G. (1989). Gugeo hyeongtaelon yeongu [Study of Korean morphology in Korean]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
16.
KreuzR.J. (2000). The production and processing of verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 99–107.
17.
KubotaM. (1995). Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. The Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin, 9, 35–67.
18.
LandisJ.R.KochG.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
19.
LantolfJ.P. (2010). Minding your hands: The function of gesture in L2 learning. In: BatstoneR. (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 131–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York: Routledge.
21.
McManusK.MarsdenE. (in press). L2 grammatical development: Investigating meaning-based practice and awareness about the L1 in L2 learning. Applied Linguistics.
22.
MillerR. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RatnerC. (2012). Macro cultural psychology: A political philosophy of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
RoseK.R. (2005). On the effect of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399.
25.
ShivelyR.L.MenkeM.R.Manzón-OmundsonS.M. (2008). Perception of irony by L2 learners of Spanish. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 16, 101–132.
26.
SwainM. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In: ByrnesH. (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
27.
TaguchiN. (2005). Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 89, 543–562.
28.
TaguchiN. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in EFL. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 313–338.
29.
TaguchiN. (2008). Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in English as a second language. Language Learning, 58, 33–71.
30.
TalyzinaN. (1981). The psychology of learning: Theories of learning and programmed instruction. Moscow: Progress Press.
31.
VygotskyL.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
VygotskyL.S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 1. New York: Plenum.
33.
VygotskyL.S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. RieberR.W.WollockJ. (Eds.). New York: Plenum.
34.
WellsG. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yus RamosF. (2000). On reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 27–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
