When teaching foreign languages to very young learners, motivation is an issue that needs to be taken into account even more than in the case of any other age group. Teaching materials and students’ textbooks used in schools and preschools, however carefully crafted, often fail to cater for the genuine interests of children and to invoke intrinsic motivation for learning. This article aims to examine whether centring teaching around authentic media material, such as popular cartoons, and the accompanying branded toys, affects the level of second language (L2) knowledge and motivation for learning. The ‘one environment – one language’ approach was developed for this case study, which focuses on the learning progression of one four-year-old during the period of 18 months. The results speak in favour of using this approach both in kindergarten settings, exploiting role play with playschool character toys, as well as in home settings, where family characters can be used to connect home and preschool environments.
AblowJ.C.MeaselleJ.R. (1993). Berkeley puppet interview: Administration and scoring system manuals. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
2.
AlexiouT. (2015). Vocabulary uptake from Peppa Pig: A case study of preschool EFL learners in Greece’. In: GitsakiC.AlexiouT. (Eds.), Current issues in second/foreign language teaching and teacher education: Research and practice (pp. 285–301). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
3.
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Committee on Public Education. (1999). Media education. Pediatrics, 104, 341–343.
4.
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Council on Communications and Media. (2011). Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics, 128, 1040–1045.
5.
BakerC. (2007). A parents’ and teachers’ guide to bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
6.
Barron-HauwaertS. (2004). Language strategies for bilingual families: The one-parent-one-language approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Blanusa TroseljD.SricaS. (2014). Television contents and children’s free kindergarten play. Croatian Journal of Education, 16, 25–41.
9.
BroadheadP. (2004). Early years play and learning: Developing social skills and cooperation. London/New York: Routledge Falmer.
10.
BryantJ.A.MullikinJ.MaxwellM.et al. (1999). Effects of two years’ viewing of Blue’s Clues. Tuscaloosa, AL: Institute for Communication Research.
11.
BushmanB.J.StackA.D. (1996). Forbidden fruit versus tainted fruit: Effects of warning labels on attraction to television violence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 207–226.
12.
CameronL. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CameronL. (2003). Challenges for ELT from the expansion in teaching children. ELT Journal, 57, 105–112.
14.
ChristieJ.F.EnzB. (1992). The effects of literacy play interventions on preschoolers’ play patterns and literacy development. Early Education and Development, 3, 205–220.
15.
CookG. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
DaviesB. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
FischS.M. (2004). Children’s learning from educational television: Sesame Street and beyond. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
FletaM.T. (2003). Is-insertion in L2 grammars of English: A step forward between developmental stages? In: LicerasJ.M.et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2002) (pp. 85–96). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
24.
GarciaO.WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
GiffordC.Walsh ValdesV.WeinerE. (Producers) & ChialtasG.S.et al. (Directors). (2000). Dora the Explorer. USA: Nickelodeon Productions.
27.
Goorhuis-BrouwerS.de BotK. (2010). Impact of early English language teaching on L1 and L2 development in children in Dutch schools. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14, 289–302.
28.
GrammontM. (1902). Observations sur le langage des enfants [Observations of child language]. Paris: C. Klincksieck.
29.
HanM. (2009). Teacher-child co-play. In: CarlisleR.P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of play in today’s society (pp. 701–705). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
30.
HanM.MooreN.VukelichC.BuellM. (2010). Does play make a difference? How play intervention affects the vocabulary learning of at-risk pre-schoolers. American Journal of Play, 3, 82–105.
31.
Hauser-CramP.NugentJ.K.ThiesK.M.TraversJ.B. (2014). The development of children and adolescents. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
Howard GolaA.A.MayeuxL.NaiglesL.R. (2011). Electronic media as incidental language teachers. In: SingerD.G.SingerJ.L. (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 135–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
JohnsonJ.E.ChristieJ.F.WardleF. (2005). Play, development, and early education. Boston, MA: Pearson.
34.
KirkorianH.L.WartellaE.A.AndersonD.R. (2008). Media and young children’s learning. The Future of Children, 18, Children and Electronic Media, 39–61.
35.
Larson-HallJ. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35–63.
36.
LeopoldW.F. (1939–49) Speech development of a bilingual child: Volumes 1–4. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
37.
LevyR. (2008). ‘Third spaces’ are interesting places: Applying ‘third space theory’ to nursery-aged children’s constructions of themselves as readers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8, 43–66.
38.
LinebargerD.L. (2001). Summative evaluation of Dora the Explorer, Part 1: Learning outcomes. Kansas City: ABCD Ventures.
39.
Linguaphone Group. (2011). Pingu. London: LG & DE Limited. Retrieved from: http://www.pingusenglish.com (March2016).
40.
LovelaceV. (1990). ‘Sesame Street’ as a continuing experiment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, Children’s Learning from Television: Research and Development at the Children’s Television Workshop, 17–24.
41.
Mandel MorrowL. (2007). Developing literacy in preschool. New York: The Guilford Press.
42.
MeaselleJ.R.AblowJ.C.CowanP.A.CowanC.P. (1998). Assessing young children’s views of their academic, social, and emotional lives: An evaluation of the self-perception scales of the Berkeley puppet interview. Child Development, 69, 1556–1576.
43.
Mihaljevic DjigunovicJ. (2010). Starting age and L1 and L2 interaction. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14, 303–314.
44.
MossP. (2001). The otherness of Reggio. In: AbbottL.NutbrownC. (Eds.), Experiencing Reggio Emilia: Implications for preschool provision (pp. 125–137). Buckingham/Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
NikolovM. (Ed.). (2009). The age factor and early language learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
47.
NikolovM.Mihaljevic DjigunovicJ. (2006). Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 234–260.
48.
Paige JohnsonT.KesslerT.SantomeroA.C. (Producers) & SheridanM. (Director). (1996). Blue’s Clues. USA: Nick Jr Productions.
49.
ParkC. (2008). ‘One Person – One Language (OPOL).’ In: GonzálezJ.M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of bilingual education (pp. 635–637). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
PavlovichM. (1920). Le langage enfantin: Acquisition du serbe et du français par un enfant serbe [Child language: Acquisition of Serbian and French by a Serbian child]. Paris: Champion.
Prosic-SantovacD. (2009). Home and school use of Mother Goose. Belgrade: Andrejevic Endowment.
53.
Prosic-SantovacD. (2014). Happily ever after: (De)constructing cultural values across centuries. In: LopicicV.Misic-IlicB. (Eds.), Values across cultures and times (pp. 23–36). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
54.
RiceM.L.WoodsmallL. (1988). Lessons from television: Children’s word learning when viewing. Child Development, 59, 420–429.
55.
RiceM.L.HustonA.C.TruglioR.WrightJ. (1990). Words from Sesame Street: Learning vocabulary while viewing. Developmental Psychology, 26, 421–428.
RonjatJ. (1913). Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue [The development of language observed in a bilingual child]. Paris: Librairie Ancienne H. Champion.
58.
RoseberryS.et al. (2009). Live action: Can young children learn verbs from video?Child Development, 80, 1360–1375.
59.
RoskosK.ErgulC.BryanT.BursteinK.ChristieJ.HanM. (2008). Who’s learning what words and how fast? Preschoolers’ vocabulary growth in an early literacy program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 275–90.
60.
SchorJ.B. (2004). Born to buy: The commercialized child and the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner.
61.
ShinJ.K.CrandallJ. (2014). Teaching young learners English: From theory to practice. Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.
62.
SingerJ.L.SingerD.G. (1981). Television, imagination, and aggression: A study of preschoolers. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63.
Van HoornJ.L.Monighan NourotP.ScalesB.Rodriguez AlwardK. (2003). Play at the center of the curriculum. 3rd edition.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
64.
Van LierL. (2004). The semiotics and ecology of language learning: Perception, voice, identity and democracy. Utbildning & Demokrati, 13, 79–103.
65.
Walker CaffreyJ. (2008). Drive. Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press.
66.
WangH.J.GuthrieJ.T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.
67.
WardL.M. (2005). Children, adolescents, and the media: The molding of minds, bodies, and deeds. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 109, 63–71.
68.
WidenS.C.RussellJ.A. (2003). A closer look at preschoolers’ freely produced labels for facial expressions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 114–128.
69.
WigfieldA. (1997). Children’s motivations for reading and reading engagement. In: GuthrieJ.T.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 14–33). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
70.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ.T.McGoughK. (1996). A questionnaire measure of children’s motivations for reading. Instructional Resource No. 22. Washington, DC: National Reading Research Center.
