The present study aimed to examine whether distributed practice works better than massed practice for proceduralization of grammatical knowledge. Learners of Japanese as a second language were trained on an element of Japanese morphology under either massed or distributed practice conditions. Results showed that massed practice led to accurate utterances to the same extent as distributed practice. It was also shown that massed practice may lead to more rapid utterances than distributed practice. A number of potential factors that mediate the effects of distributed practice are discussed.
AndersonJ.R.BothellD.ByrneM.D.DouglassS.LebiereC.QinY. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.
2.
BirdS. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635–650.
3.
BloomK.C.ShuellT.J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245–248.
4.
CarpenterS.K.PashlerH.CepedaN.J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of US history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760–771.
5.
CarpenterS.K.CepedaN.J.RohrerD.KangS.H.K.PashlerH. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369–378.
6.
CepedaN.J.PashlerH.VulE.WixtedJ.T.RohrerD. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CollinsL.WhiteJ. (2011). An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 106–133.
10.
De JongN. (2005). Can second language grammar be learned through listening. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 205–234.
11.
De JongN.SteinelM.P.FlorijnA.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 893–916.
12.
DeKeyserR.M. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DeKeyserR.M. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In: VanPattenB.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94–112). 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
14.
DonovanJ.J.RadosevichD.J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795–805.
15.
ForsterK.I.ForsterJ.C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
16.
KarpickeJ.D.BauernschmidtA. (2011). Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1250–1257.
17.
KimJ.W.RitterF.E.KoubekR.J. (2013). An integrated theory for improved skill acquisition and retention in the three stages of learning. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14, 22–37.
18.
LeveltW.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19.
NakataT. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Published online: 16April2015 (doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000825).
20.
PavlikP.I.AndersonJ.R. (2005). Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: An activation-based model of the spacing effect. Cognitive Science, 29, 559–586.
21.
RohrerD. (2015). Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review. Published online: 21July2015 (doi: 10.1017/S10648-015-9332-4).
22.
RohrerD.PashlerH. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 183–186.
23.
SchuetzeU. (2015). Spacing techniques in second language vocabulary acquisition: Short-term gains vs. long-term memory. Language Teaching Research, 19, 28–42.
24.
SeabrookR.BrownG.D.A.SolityJ.E. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 107–122.
25.
SegalowitzN.S. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Taylor & Francis.
26.
SerranoR. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61, 117–145.
27.
SerranoR.MuñozC. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL?System, 35, 305–321.
28.
SobelH.S.CepedaN.J.KaplerI.V. (2011). Spacing effects in real world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 763–767.
29.
SteigerJ.H. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 164–182.
30.
ToppinoT.C.GerbierE. (2014). About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 60, 113–189.
31.
VanceT.J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
