A brief ‘language learning experience’ (LLE) in Thai was integrated into a second language development course as part of postgraduate TESOL study at an Australian university. Sixty primary and secondary teachers from a range of schools evaluated the impact of the LLE by means of a questionnaire; the teachers proved highly affirming of its value, nominating awareness of experiential learning and affective factors as the most salient outcomes. An additional and unexpected outcome was its impact upon the lecturer himself, who also served as the language instructor. This dual role of lecturer-instructor resulted in the creation of a different tenor of relationships with teachers; in the lecturer’s deeper understanding of the constraints of teaching a language other than one’s own; and, most directly, in his enhanced capacity to present key concepts in the field of second language development.
AngelovaM. (2005). Using Bulgarian mini-lessons in an SLA course to improve the KAL of American ESL teachers. In BartelsN. (Ed.), Researching applied linguistics in language teacher education (pp. 27–42). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
2.
BaileyK.M. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In SeligerH.W.LongM.H. (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 67–102). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
3.
BaileyK.M.CurtisA.NunanD. (2001). Pursuing professional development: The self as a source. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
4.
BarkhuisenG.BorgS. (2010). Editorial: Researching language teacher education. Language Teaching Research, 14, 237–240.
5.
BartelsN. (2002). Professional preparation and action research: Only for language teachers?TESOL Quarterly, 36, 71–79.
6.
BigelowM.TedickD.J. (2005). Combining foreign and second language teacher education: Rewards and challenges. In TedickD.J. (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 295–311). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BorgS. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
8.
BrownH.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. 4th edition.New York: Longman.
9.
de CourcyM. (2005). The effect of learning a new language on ESL teachers’ beliefs about language pedagogy. Australian Language and Literacy Matters, 2, 7–13.
10.
CookV. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 185–209.
11.
CumminsJ. (1991). Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In BialystokE. (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EllisE.M. (2004). Language background and professional competencies in teaching ESOL. English Australia, 21, 55–71.
13.
EllisE.M. (2006). Language learning experience as a contributor to ESOL teacher cognition. TESL-EJ, 10. Retrieved from: http://tesl-ej.org/ej37/a3.html (July2014).
14.
EllisE.M. (2012). Language awareness and its relevance to TESOL. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 7, 1–23.
15.
EllisR. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy, Language Teaching, 43, 182–201.
16.
FlowerdewJ. (1998). Language learning experience in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 529–536.
17.
FormanR. (2010). Ten principles of bilingual pedagogy. In MahboobA. (Ed.), The NNEST lens: non native speakers in TESOL (pp. 54–86). Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
18.
FormanR. (2012). Six functions of bilingual EFL teacher talk: Animating, translating, explaining, creating, prompting and dialoguing. RELC Journal, 43, 239–253.
19.
GibbonsP. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 247–273.
20.
GorsuchG.J.BeglarD. (2004). Teaching second language acquisition courses: Views from new faculty. TESL-EJ, 8. Retrieved from: http://tesl-ej.org/ej29/a2.html (July2014).
21.
HaddockD (1998). New Zealand TESOL professional characteristics and the indicators of competence. TESOLANZ Journal, 6, 89–99.
22.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
23.
KramschC. (2000). Language and identity in language learning. University Park, CA: Centre for Language Acquisition Speaker Series.
24.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN. (1999). How languages are learned. 2nd edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN. (2006). How languages are learned. 3rd edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Linguaphone Thai Language Course. (1995). London: Linguaphone Institute.
27.
LiyanageI.BartlettB.J. (2008). Contextually responsive transfer: Perceptions of NNES on an ESL/EFL teacher training programme. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1827–1836.
28.
LoG.Y.-H. (2005). Relevance of knowledge of second language acquisition. In BartelsN. (Ed.), Researching applied linguistics in language teacher education (pp. 135–158). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
29.
MacDonaldM.BadgerR.WhiteG. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning and teaching?Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 949–963.
30.
OdlinT. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
