The need for foreign language education in the US has increased in recent years, and teaching methods based on traditional textbooks are unlikely to meet the real-world needs of current learners. As a response, interest in Language for Specific Purposes programs has grown and so has Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) methodology. This article describes and evaluates a recently developed, task-based Spanish course for a governmental agency, which was put in place to help employees conduct their jobs more efficiently. Three exploratory empirical studies undertaken to evaluate this program are presented and discussed: (1) a pilot study comparing the oral proficiency of students in the grammar-based course and students in the TBLT course; (2) a study to establish whether the students’ overall proficiency had improved as a result of the TBLT program; and (3) a qualitative study of students’ perceptions about the Spanish TBLT program. The results indicate that the task-based course not only prepares trainees to complete critical job tasks in the L2, but it also improves participants’ overall Spanish proficiency. These results contribute to the increasing evidence of the potential of TBLT for language learning.
AldersonJ.C.BerettaA. (Eds.). (1992). Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BachmanL., (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453–476.
4.
BlakeR.WilsonN.CettoM.Pardo-BallesterC. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning and Technology, 12, 114–127.
5.
BrindleyG. (2009). Task-centered language assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. In Van den BrandenK.BygateM.NorrisJ.M. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 435–454). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
6.
ByrnesH. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437.
7.
ByrnesH.CraneC.MaximH.SprangK. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–109
8.
ChaudronC. (2003). Data collection in SLA research. In DoughtyC.LongM. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 762–828). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9.
ColpinM.GorpK.V. (2007). Task-based writing in primary education: The development and evaluation of writing skills through writing tasks, learner and teacher support. In Van den BrandenK.Van GorpK.VerhelstM. (Eds.), Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 194–234) . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DevliegerM.GoossensG. (2007). An assessment tool for the evaluation of teacher practice in powerful task-based language learning environments. In Van den BrandenK.Van GorpK.VerhelstM. (Eds.), Tasks in Action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 92–130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
11.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York: MacMIllan/Collier.
12.
DoughtyC.LongM.H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 50–80.
13.
DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (1998). In LongM.H.RichardsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
FoxJ.FraserW. (2009). Test Reviews: The Versant™ Spanish test. Language Testing, 26, 312–322.
16.
FurmanN.GoldbergD.LusinN. (2010). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, Fall2009, Modern Language Association of America. Retrieved from http://www.mla.org/pdf/2009_enrollment_survey.pdf.
17.
GilabertR. (2004). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
18.
González-LloretM. (2007). Implementing task-based language teaching on the web. In Van den BrandenK.GorpK.V.VerhelstM. (Eds.), Task-based language education (pp. 265–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
HedgcockJ. (1991) Foreign language retention and attrition: A study of maintenance patterns among adult learners of Spanish. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
21.
LongM.H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In HyltenstamK.PienemannM. (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
22.
LongM.H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de BotK.GinsbergR.B.KramschC. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
23.
LongM.H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
24.
LongM.H.CrookesG. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–55.
25.
LongM.H.NorrisJ.M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In ByramM. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). London, UK: Routledge.
26.
LongM.H.RobinsonP. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McDonoughK.ChaikitmongkolW. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 107–132.
29.
MislevyR.J.SteinbergL.S.AlmondR.G. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19, 477–496.
30.
National Research Council (2007). International education and foreign languages: Keys to securing America’s future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NorrisJ. (2009). Task-Based Teaching and Testing. In LongM.DoughtyC. (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
33.
NorrisJ.M.BrownJ.D.HudsonT.D.YoshiokaJ.K. (1998). Designing second language performance assessment. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
34.
OrtegaL. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.
35.
OrtegaL. (2000). Understanding syntactic complexity: The measurement of change in the syntax of instructed L2 Spanish learners. (Order No. 9977566, University of Hawai’i). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304591428?accountid=27140. (304591428).
RhodesN.C.PufahlI. (2010). Foreign language teaching in US schools: results of a national survey. Washington, D.C: CAL.
38.
RobinsonP. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140.
39.
SachsG.T. (2007). The challenges of adopting and adapting task-based cooperative teaching and learning in an EFL context. In Van den BrandenK.Van GorpK.VerhelstM. (Eds.), Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 235–264). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SamudaV. (2009). Guiding relationships between forma and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In van den BrandenK.BygateM.NorrisJ.M. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 379–400). Amsterdam, The Netherlands Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
41.
SkehanP. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.
42.
TowellR.TomlinsonP. (1999). Language curriculum development research at university level. Language Teaching Research, 3, 1–32.
43.
Van den BrandenK. (2009). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In Van den BrandenK.BygateM.NorrisJ.M. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 401–429). Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
44.
Van den BrandenK. (Ed.) (2006). Task-based language education: from theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Van den BrandenK. (2009). Diffusion and implementation of innovation. In LongM.H.DoughtyC. (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 659–672). Chichester, UK; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
WeirC.RobertsJ. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
WillisJ (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.
49.
ZhangE.Y. (2006). TBLT-Innovation in Primary School English Language Teaching in Mainland China. In Van den BrandenK.Van GorpK.VerhelstM. (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 68–91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
