This study investigates a teacher’s L1 use during focus-on-form episodes (FFEs). FFEs assist L2 learning by bringing learners’ attention to language. We studied the language used in FFEs in a Spanish as a foreign language (SFL) classroom to better understand the pedagogical purposes of L1 use in the classroom. We video-recorded 12 hours of an intermediate-high SFL classroom with an L1 English teacher at a US university. The audio data was segmented into FFEs and then coded (English L1, Spanish L2, mix) to reflect the language used in each of the teacher’s utterances. We also identified the linguistic areas (e.g., grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation) targeted in the FFEs. Chi-square and descriptive statistics were used to understand the relationship between the teacher’s language and the linguistic areas. Lastly, using the same data set, we conducted a qualitative analysis in order to depict the situations in which the teacher employed the L1 and L2. There was a significant relationship between the teacher’s language and the FFEs’ linguistic areas. Specifically, the L1 and L2 were used equally when FFEs concerned vocabulary and grammar. However, when FFEs concerned semantics, frequent code-switching occurred. The qualitative data illustrate that the language choice may depend on the interactional patterns and the complexity of the linguistic structure.
BretzM.L.DvorakT.KirschnerC.BrandorferR.KihyetC. (2008). ¡Avance! (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Brooks-LewisK.A. (2009). Adult learners’ perceptions of the incorporation of their L1 in foreign language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics, 30, 216–235.
3.
CookV. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 402–423.
4.
delaCampaJ.C.NassajiJ.C. (2009). The Amount, purpose and reasons for using L1 in L2 classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 742–759.
5.
DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DuffP.PolioC. (1990). How much foreign language is there in the foreign language classroom?The Modern Language Journal, 74, 154–166.
7.
EllisR. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46.
8.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
EllisR.BasturkmenH.LoewenS. (2001a). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.
10.
EllisR.BasturkmenH.LoewenS. (2001b). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407–432.
11.
EllisR.LoewenS.ErlamR. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquistion of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368.
12.
KanekoT. (1992). The role of the first languae in foreign language classroom. Philadelphia, PA:Temple University.
13.
KangD.-M. (2008). The classroom language use of a Korean elementary school EFL teacher: Another look at TETE. System, 36, 214–226.
14.
KrashenS. (1981). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London, UK: Prentice-Hall International Ltd.
15.
LevineG. (2011). Code choice in the language classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16.
LoewenS. (2003). Variation in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form. Language Teaching Research, 2003, 315–345.
17.
LoewenS. (2009). The use of the L1 in focus on form. Contact, 35, 59–70.
18.
LoewenS. (2011). Focus on form. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Volume II (pp. 576–592). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
LongM. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de BotK.GinsbergR.B.KramschC. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
20.
LongM. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In RitchieW.C.BhatiaT.K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
21.
LysterR. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
22.
LysterR.RantaL. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Secoond Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
23.
LysterR.SaitoK. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
24.
MacaroE. (2001). Analysing student teachers’ codeswitching in foreign language classrooms: Theories and decision making. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 531–548.
25.
MackeyA.GassS.McDonoughK. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.
26.
MackeyA.GooJ. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
MitchellR. (1988). Communicative language teaching in practice. London, UK: Centre for Information on language Teaching and Research.
28.
NassajiH. (2010). The occurence and effectiveness of spontaneous focus on form in adult ESL classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 6, 907–933.
29.
PolioC.DuffP. (1994). Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 402–426.
30.
RobinsonP. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331.
31.
Rolin-IanzitiJ.BrownlieS. (2002). Teacher use of learners’ native language in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 58, 402–426.
32.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11, 129–158.
33.
SchmidtR. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In SchmidtR. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–66). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
34.
SchmidtR. (2001). Attention. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SchweersC.W. (1999). Using L1 in the L2 classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37, 6–13.
36.
SwainM.LapkinS. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251–274.
37.
TangJ. (2002). Using L1 in the English classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40, 36–43.
38.
TianL.MacaroE. (2012). Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanation on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: A lexical focus-on-form study. Language Teaching Research, 16, 361–385.
39.
TomlinR.VillaV. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–204.
40.
TurnbullM. (2001). There is a role for the L1 in second and foreign language teaching, but…The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 531–540.
41.
van LierL. (1995). The use of the L1 in L2 classes. Babylonia, 2, 37–43.
42.
WilkersonC. (2008). Instructors’ use of English in the modern language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 310–320.
43.
WilliamsJ. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583–625.
