The aim of this article is twofold: to assess the effectiveness of a CLIL (content and language integrated learning) module on affective factors (motivation and self-esteem), and to test the purported blurring effect of CLIL on gender differences in foreign language learning. Forty-six students in their fourth year of compulsory secondary education were administered a background questionnaire, a questionnaire on motivation and self-esteem, and a vocabulary test. Participants’ learning of vocabulary was tested on a pre-test, immediate post-test and delayed post-test design. Results revealed that CLIL can help reduce gender differences in motivation. Similarly, vocabulary tests indicated that the CLIL module had a similar positive effect on both male and female students’ learning of the technical content-related vocabulary.
AmmarA.SpadaN. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
2.
CarrJ.PauwelsA. (2006). Boys and foreign language learning: Real boys don’t do languages. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
ChambersG.N. (1999). Motivating language learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
4.
ClarkA.TraffordJ. (1995). Boys into modern languages: an investigation of the discrepancy in attitudes and performance between boys and girls in modern languages. Gender and Education, 7, 315–325.
5.
CoyleD. (2008). CLIL: A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In Van Deusen-ShollN.HornbergerN.H. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education: Volume 4: Knowledge about language (pp. 97–111). New York: Springer.
6.
CoyleD. (2010). Foreword. In LasagabasterD.Ruiz de ZarobeY. (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. vii–viii). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
7.
CoyleD.HoodP.MarshD. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CsizérK.KormosJ. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
9.
Dalton-PufferC. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204.
10.
DekeyserR.M. (2000). The robustness of the critical period effect in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–534.
11.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
13.
DörnyeiZ.CsizérK.NémethN. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
14.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.) (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
15.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. ( 2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.
16.
EhrmanM.E.OxfordR.L. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74, 311–327.
17.
Eurydice (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: The Eurydice European Unit.
18.
GrahamS. (2001). Inferences about responsibility and values: Implications for academic motivation. In SaliliF.ChiuC.Y.HongY.Y. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. (pp. 31–59). New York: Kluwer.
19.
HenryA. (2009). Gender differences in compulsory school pupils’ L2 self-concepts: A longitudinal study. System, 37, 177–193.
20.
Jiménez CatalánR.M.OjedaJ. (2009). Disponibilidad léxica en inglés como lengua extranjera en dos tipos de instrucción [Lexical availability in English as a foreign language in three types of instruction]. Lenguaje y Textos, 30, 167–178.
21.
Jiménez CatalánR.M.Ruiz de ZarobeY. (2009). The receptive vocabulary of EFL learners in two instructional contexts: CLIL vs. Non-CLIL. In Ruiz de ZarobeY.Jiménez CatalánR.M. (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 81–92). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
22.
LasagabasterD. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated learning courses. The Open Applied Linguistic Journal, 1, 30–41
23.
LasagabasterD. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 3–18.
24.
LasagabasterD.Ruiz de ZarobeY. (Eds.) (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
25.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
26.
MasgoretA.M.GardnerR.C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 123–163.
27.
Merisuo-StormT. (2007). Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 226–235.
28.
NavésM.T.VictoriM. (2010). CLIL in Catalonia: An overview of research studies. In LasagabasterD.Ruiz de ZarobeY. (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 30–54). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
PowellR.BattersJ. (1985). Pupils’ perceptions of foreign language learning at 12+: Some gender differences. Educational Studies, 11, 11–23.
31.
RyanS. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 120–143). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
32.
San IsidroX. (2010). An insight into Galician CLIL: Provision and results. In LasagabasterD.Ruiz de ZarobeY. (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 55–78). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
33.
Seikkula-LeinoJ. (2007). CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21, 328–341.
34.
SchmidtR.BoraieD.KassagbyO. (1996). Foreign language motivation: international structure and external connections. In OxfordR.L. (Ed.), Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century (pp. 9–20). Hawaii: University of Hawaii.
35.
SpolskyB. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
TaguchiT.MagidM.PapiM. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
37.
UshiodaE. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation and identity. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
38.
WilliamsM.BurdenR.LanversU. (2002). ‘French is the language of love and stuff’: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 503–28.
39.
XanthouM. (2007). Current trends in L2 Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. Is CLIL the Right Approach?Paper presented at the 14th International Conference of the Greek Applied Linguistics Association, 14–16 December, Thessaloniki, Greece.
40.
YassinS.MarshD.TekO.YingL. (2009). Learners’ perceptions towards the teaching of science through English in Malaysia: A quantitative analysis. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 54–69.
