This study investigated the interactions between feedback type, proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target in the learning of Chinese as a foreign language. Seventy-eight learners from two large US universities participated in the study. The participants were divided into two proficiency levels based on their performance on a standardized proficiency test. At each proficiency level, they were randomly assigned to three feedback conditions: recasts, metalinguistic correction, and control. Learners in the experimental conditions received feedback on their nontargetlike use of classifiers and the perfective -le. Results revealed that for the perfective -le, recasts benefited the high-level but not low-level learners; at the high proficiency level, the effects of recasts were more sustainable than those of metalinguistic correction. With respect to classifiers, recasts were effective for learners at both proficiency levels. For both target structures, metalinguistic correction showed larger effects than recasts for the low-level learners, but the two feedback types were equally effective for the advanced learners. The results underscore the importance of taking an interactional approach to the investigation of corrective feedback. The results also undermine the commonly believed superiority of explicit feedback over implicit feedback.
AmmarA.SpadaN. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
2.
ChafeW. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
ChoiS.LiS. (2012). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in a child ESOL classroom. The RELC Journal, 43, 331–351.
4.
ChristensenM. (1994). Variation in spoken and written Mandarin narrative discourse. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
5.
DoughtyC.VarelaE. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DuffP.LiD. (2002). The acquisition and use of perfective aspect in Mandarin. In SalaberryR.ShiraiY. (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 417–452). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
7.
EgiT. (2007). Recasts, learners’ interpretations, and L2 development. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 249–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
EllisR. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
9.
EllisR. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
EllisR.SheenY. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575–600.
11.
EllisR.LoewenS.ErlamR. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 28, 339–368.
12.
ErbaughM. (1986). Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In CraigC. (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 399–436). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
13.
ErlamR. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464–491.
14.
GassS. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
GassS.SveticsI.LemelinS. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 497–546.
16.
GoldschneiderJ.DeKeyserR. (2005). Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 55 (Suppl.), 27–77.
17.
HanZ. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572.
18.
HulstijnJ. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129–140.
19.
IwashitaN. (2003). Positive and negative input in task-based interaction: Differential affects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1–36.
20.
KrashenS. (1995). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall Europe.
21.
Larson-HallJ. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
22.
LeemanJ. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63.
23.
LiC.ThompsonS. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
24.
LiP.ShiraiY. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25.
LiS. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
26.
LoewenS.NabeiT. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361–377). New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
LongM. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In RitchieW. C.BhatiaT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
28.
LongM.H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
LongM.InagakiS.OrtegaL. (1998). The role of negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357–371.
30.
LysterR. (2004). Different effects of prompts and effects in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
31.
LysterR.IzquierdoJ. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 59, 453–498.
32.
LysterR.MoriH. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.
33.
LysterR.RantaL. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
34.
LysterR.SaitoK. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
35.
LysterR.SaitoK.SatoM. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.
36.
MackeyA.GooJ. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 408–452). New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
MackeyA.PhilpJ. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings?The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.
38.
MorrisD.BransfordJ.FranksJ. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
39.
NassajiH. (2009). The effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411–452.
40.
PhilipJ. (2003). Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126.
41.
RobinsonP. (1997). Individual differences and fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99.
42.
RobinsonP. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstadt (1991). In RobinsonP., Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
43.
SchmidtR. (1993). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
44.
SheenY. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 203–234.
45.
SheenY. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences, and second language learning. London: Springer.
46.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.MaddenC. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
47.
VendlerZ. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.
48.
WuY.BodomoA. (2009). Classifiers ≠ determiners. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 487–503.
49.
XiaoR.McEneryT. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
50.
YangJ. (2003). Back to the basic: The basic function of particle LE in modern Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 38, 77–96.
51.
YangY.LysterR. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.
