The purpose of this research was to investigate the major patterns in content-based instruction (CBI) lesson plans among practicum teachers at the final stage of an MA TESOL program. One hundred and seven lesson plans were coded according to a typology developed to evaluate clarity and identify areas of potential difficulty in the design of content and language objectives by TESOL teacher candidates for use in PreK–12 ESL classrooms. Participants in our study tended to have more difficulty in designing language objectives than content objectives. There was also a tendency to write language objectives that focused heavily on the four language skills and on vocabulary, and considerably less often on grammatical structures, functions, or language learning strategies.
AndrewsS. (2001). The language awareness of the L2 teacher: Its impact upon pedagogical practice. Language Awareness, 10, 75–90.
2.
AndrewsS. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12, 81–95.
3.
AndrewsS. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArkoudisS. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 9, 415–433.
5.
BaecherL.FarnsworthT. (2011). Understanding teachers’ challenges in writing language objectives in content-based instruction. Paper presented at the Language Teacher Education Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, May, 2011.
6.
BaileyK. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. In BaileyK.NunanD. (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BigelowM. (2010). Learning to plan for a focus on form in CBI: The role of teacher knowledge and teaching context. In DavisJ. (Ed.), World language teacher education: Transitions and challenges in the twenty-first century (pp. 35–56). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
8.
BigelowM.RanneyS. (2005). Pre-service ESL teachers’ knowledge about language and its transfer to lesson planning. In BartelsN. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education: Volume 4 (pp. 179–200). New York: Springer Science/ Business Media.
9.
BulloughR.V. (1992). Beginning teacher curriculum decision making, personal teaching metaphors, and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 239–252.
10.
CammarataL. (2009). Negotiating curricular transitions: Foreign language teachers’ learning experience with content-based instruction. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 65, 559–585.
11.
CreeseA. (2006). Supporting talk? Partnership teachers in classroom interaction. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 9, 434–453.
12.
Dalton-PufferC. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13.
DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (1998). Focus on form in classroom SLA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DunnT.G.ShrinerC. (1999). Deliberate practice in teaching: What teachers do for self-improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 631–651.
15.
EchevarriaJ.ShortD.PowersK. (2008). Making content comprehensible for non-native speakers of English: The SIOP Model.The International Journal of Learning, 14, 41–50.
16.
EdigerA.McCormackB. (2007). Grammar knowledge requirements in ESL teacher preparation as evidenced through novice teachers’ written feedback on lexical and grammatical errors. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, Costa Mesa, CA, April 2007.
17.
FisherD.FreyN. (2010). Unpacking the language purpose: Vocabulary, structure, and function. TESOL Journal, 1, 315–337.
18.
GándaraP.Maxwell-JollyJ.DriscollA. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education.
19.
HoB. (1995). Using lesson plans as a means of reflection. ELT Journal, 49, 66–71.
20.
HudsonP.MillerS.P.ButlerF. (2006). Adapting and merging explicit instruction within reform based mathematics classrooms. American Secondary Education, 35, 19–32.
21.
JohnP.D. (1991). Course, curricular and classroom influences on the development of student teachers’ lesson planning perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 359–373.
22.
JohnP.D. (1994). The integration of research validated knowledge with practice: Lesson planning and the student history teacher. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24, 33–49.
23.
JohnP.D. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Re-thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 483–498.
24.
KaganD.TippinsD.J. (1992). The evolution of functional lesson plans among twelve elementary and secondary student teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 477–491.
25.
LiyanageI.BartlettB.J. (2010). From autopsy to biopsy: A metacognitive view of lesson planning and teacher trainees in ELT. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1362–1371.
26.
LongM. (2007). Problems in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
LysterR. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28.
MackeyA.PolioC.McDonoughK. (2004). The relationship between experience, education, and teachers’ use of incidental focus on form techniques. Language Teaching Research, 8, 301–327.
29.
MarzanoR.J.PickeringD.J.PollockJ.E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
30.
McCutcheonG.MilnerH. R. (2002). A contemporary study of teacher planning in a high school English class. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 81–94.
31.
MenkenK.AntunezB. (2001). An overview of the preparation and certification of teachers working with limited English proficient (LEP) students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
32.
MetM. (1991). Learning language through content: Learning content through language. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 281–295.
MuttonT.HaggerH.BurnK. (2011). Learning to plan, planning to learn: The developing expertise of beginning teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 17, 399–416.
35.
NunanD. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PicaT. (2008). Task-based instruction. In Van Deusen-SchollN.HornbergerN.H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education. 2nd ed. (pp. 71–82). New York: Springer Science/ Business Media.
37.
PopkoJ. (2005). How MA-TESOL students use knowledge about language in teaching ESL classes. In BartelsN. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education: Volume 4 (pp. 387–403). New York: Springer Science/ Business Media.
38.
ReevesA.R. (2011). Where great teaching begins: Planning for student thinking and learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
39.
RichardsJ.C. (1996). Teachers’ maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 281–296.
40.
RichardsJ.C.PenningtonM.C. (1998). The first year of teaching. In RichardsJ.C. (Ed.), Beyond training (pp. 173–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Sardo-BrownD. (1996). A longitudinal study of novice secondary teachers’ planning: Year two. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 519–530.
42.
ShortD. (2002). Language learning in sheltered social studies classes. TESOL Journal, 11, 18–24.
43.
ShortD.EchevarriaJ.Richards-TutorC. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15, 363–380.
44.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
45.
StollerF.L. (2004). Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 261–283.
46.
StollerF.L. (2008). Content-based instruction. In Van Deusen-SchollN.HornbergerN.H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education. 2nd ed. (pp. 59–70). New York: Springer Science/ Business Media.
47.
StollerF.L.GrabeW. (1997). A six-T’s approach to content-based instruction. In SnowM.A.BrintonD. (Eds.), The content-based classroom (pp. 78–94). New York: Longman.
48.
WarrenL.L. (2000). Teacher planning: A literature review. Educational Research Quarterly, 24, 37–42.
49.
WestermanD.A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 292–305.
50.
WigginsG.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design. 2nd ed.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
51.
WilliamsonJ.HardmanF. (1995). Time for refilling the bath?: A study of primary student-teachers’ grammatical knowledge. Language and Education, 9, 117–134.
52.
WoodsD. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
YildirimA. (2003). Instructional planning in a centralized school system: Lessons of a study among primary school teachers in Turkey. International Review of Education, 49, 525–543.
