This study examines the motivation of 20 Japanese students of English as a foreign language (EFL) who chatted electronically with 19 Taiwanese EFL students using online synchronous chat software. In particular, we were interested in four factors that affect task-based motivation: the willingness to communicate, task attractiveness, task innovativeness, and the need to communicate in the target language. Qualitative analysis of a posttest questionnaire and the texts that students produced during their online task reveal that students were generally motivated throughout the task with respect to all four of the factors. It is suggested that well-designed online chat tasks, whereby students need to arrive at a consensus via interaction, can be very motivating to students. For teachers, electronic synchronous chat represents one more valuable tool for language teachers to facilitate interaction in the target language.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–48.
2.
BeauvoisM. (1995). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177–90.
3.
BeauvoisM. (1999). Computer-mediated communication: Reducing anxiety and building community. In: YoungD. (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 144–65). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
4.
BrownH. (1990). M & Ms for the language learning classroom? Another look at motivation. In: AlatisJ. (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics (pp. 383–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5.
BrownH. (1994). Teaching by principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChunD. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17–31.
8.
ClémentR. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of second language status and characteristics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 271–90.
9.
Cooke-PlagwitzJ. (2008). New directions in CALL: An objective: Introduction to second life. CALICO Journal, 25, 547–57.
10.
CordovaD.LepperM. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–30.
11.
CovingtonM. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CrookesG.SchmidtR. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469–512.
13.
CsizérK.KormosJ. (2009). Modelling the role of inter-cultural contact in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30, 166–85.
14.
DarhowerM. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249–77.
15.
DeciE.FlasteR. (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York: Penguin.
16.
DeciE.RyanR. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
17.
DonatoR. (2000). Sociocultural contributions in understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In: LantolfJ. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
DörnyeiZ. (1994a). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78, 273–84.
19.
DörnyeiZ. (1994b). Understanding L2 motivation: on with the challenge. Modern Language Journal, 78, 515–23.
20.
DörnyeiZ. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching Journal, 31, 117–35.
21.
DörnyeiZ. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DörnyeiZ. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In: RobinsonP. (Ed.), Individual differences in second language acquisition (pp. 137–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second Language acquisition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
DörnyeiZ.KormosJ. (2000). The role of the individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300.
25.
EcclesJ.WigfieldA.SchiefeleU. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In: EisenbergN. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume IV: Social and personality development (pp. 1017–95). New York: Wiley.
26.
FreiermuthM. (1998). Using a chat program to promote group equity. CAELL Journal, 8, 16–24.
27.
FreiermuthM. (2001). Native speakers or non-native speakers: Who has the Floor? Online and face-to-face interaction in culturally mixed small groups. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 14, 169–99.
28.
FreiermuthM. (2002). Internet chat: Collaborating and learning via e-conversations. TESOL Journal, 11, 36–40.
29.
FreiermuthM.JarrellD. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help?International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 191–213.
30.
GardnerR. (1968). Attitudes and motivation: Their role in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 2, 141–50.
31.
GardnerR. (1983). Learning another language: A true psychological experiment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 219–40.
32.
GardnerR.LambertW. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–72.
33.
GardnerR.LambertW. (1972). Attitudes and learning in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
34.
GardnerR.TremblayP.MasgoretA. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: an empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 81, 344–62.
35.
GassS. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
GassS.VaronisE. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302.
37.
Grantham O’BrienM.LevyR.OrichA. (2009). Virtual immersion: The role of CAVE and PC technology. CALICO Journal, 26, 337–62.
38.
HumphreysG.SprattM. (2007). Many languages, many motivations: A study of Hong Kong students’ motivation to learn different target languages. System, 36, 313–35.
39.
InyengarS.LepperM. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–66.
40.
InyengarS.LepperM. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 996–1006.
41.
JarrellD.FreiermuthM. (2005). The motivational power of Internet chat. RELC Journal, 36, 59–72.
42.
JohnsonD. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. White Plains, NY: Longman.
43.
KellerJ. (1979). Motivation and structural design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26–34.
44.
KellerJ. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In: ReigeluthC. (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 386–433). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
KelmO. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: a preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441–54.
46.
KernR. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457–76.
47.
KramschC. (2000). Social discursive constructions of self in L2 learning. In: LantolfJ. (Ed), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133–53). New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
KurataN. (2007). Language choice and second language learning opportunities in learners’ social networks: A case study of an Australian learner of Japanese. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 05.1–18.
49.
LazakidouG.SymeonR. (2009). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers and Education, 54, 3–13.
50.
LeeL. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning and Technology, 8, 83–100.
51.
LepperM. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 289–309.
52.
LepperM.CordovaD. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 187–208.
53.
LongM. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: RitchieW.BhatiaT. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–68). New York: Academic Press.
54.
LongM.SatoC. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In: DaviesA.CriperC.HowattA. (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253–79). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
55.
OrtegaL. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning and Technology, 1, 82–93.
56.
MacIntyreP. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11, 135–42.
57.
MacIntyreP.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–62.
58.
MacIntyreP.BakerS.ClémentR.ConrodS. (2001). Willingness communicate, social support and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369–88.
59.
MacIntyreP.BakerS.ClémentR.DonovanL. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 53, 537–64.
60.
MacIntyreP.BakerS.ClémentR.DonovanL. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589–607.
61.
MaloneT. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–69.
62.
MeunierL.E. (1998). Personality and motivational factors in computer-mediated foreign language communication. In: MuyskensJ.A. (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching (pp. 145–97). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
63.
NoelK.PelletierL.ClémentR.VallerandR. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 57–85.
64.
OhtaA. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development in the acquisition of L2 grammar. In: LantolfJ. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
PavlenkoA.LantolfJ. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In: LantolfJ. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
SadlerR. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and a cautionary tale of two cities. CALICO Journal, 25, 11–30.
67.
SwainM.LapkinS. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–37.
68.
TudiniV. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 141–59.
69.
van LierL. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
70.
VaronisE.GassS. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71–90.
71.
WarschauerM. (1996a). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7–26.
72.
WarschauerM. (1996b). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In: WarschauerM. (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai’i symposium (pp. 29–46). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
73.
WarschauerM. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470–81.
WenW.ClémentR. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16, 18–38.
76.
YashimaT. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66.
77.
YashimaT.Zenuk-NishideL.ShimizuK. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54, 119–52.
78.
YatesS. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In: HerringS. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 29–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
79.
ZuenglerJ. (1989). Performances variation in NS–NSS interaction: Ethnographic difference or discourse domain? In: GassS.MaddenC.PrestonD.SelinkerL. (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics (pp. 228–44). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
