Current second language (L2) instruction research has encouraged the use of collaborative output tasks in L2 classrooms. This study examined and compared the effectiveness of two types of output tasks (reconstruction cloze tasks and reconstruction editing tasks) for learning English phrasal verbs. Of interest was whether doing the tasks collaboratively led to greater gains of knowledge of the target verbs than doing the tasks individually, and also whether the type of task made a difference. The study was conducted in two intact low-intermediate adult English-as-a-second-language (ESL) classrooms. The effectiveness of the tasks was determined by how successfully learners completed the tasks and also by means of a vocabulary knowledge test administered before and after the treatment. The results showed that completing the tasks collaboratively (in pairs) led to a greater accuracy of task completion than completing them individually. However, collaborative tasks did not lead to significantly greater gains of vocabulary knowledge than individual tasks. The results, however, showed an effect of task type, with the editing tasks being more effective than the cloze tasks in promoting negotiation and learning. The findings contribute to the research that has examined the effectiveness of pedagogical tasks in L2 classrooms.
Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. ( 1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal , 78, 465-83.
2.
Appel, G. & Lantolf, J. ( 1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. Modern Language Journal, 78, 437-52.
3.
Bennett, N. & Cass, A. ( 1988). The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 15, 19-32.
4.
Berg, E.C. ( 1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215-41.
5.
Darwin, C.M. & Gray, L.S. ( 1999). Going after the phrasal verbs: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 65-83.
6.
de la Colina, A.A. & García Mayo, M.P. ( 2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91-116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
7.
Donato, R. ( 1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & A. Gabriela. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-59). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
8.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. ( 1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Ellis, R. ( 2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Ellis, R. ( 2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-72.
11.
Folse, K. ( 2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 273-93.
12.
García Mayo, M.P. ( 2002a). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 12, 156-75.
13.
García Mayo, M.P. ( 2002b). Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 323-41.
14.
García Mayo, M.P. (Ed.) (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning: Volume 2. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
15.
Harley, B. & Swain, M. ( 1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A.P.R. Howatt (Ed.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
16.
Hulstijn, J. & Marchena, E. ( 1989). Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 241-55.
17.
Kao, R. ( 2001). Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39, 195-215.
18.
Kim, Y. ( 2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal , 92, 114-30.
19.
Kowal, M. & Swain, M. ( 1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
20.
Kowal, M. & Swain, M. ( 1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In M. Swain (Ed.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. ( 2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research , 37, 343-58.
22.
Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Shapson, S. ( 1990). French immersion research agenda for the 90s. Canadian Modern Language Review, 46, 638-74.
23.
Lapkin, S., Hart, D., & Swain, M. ( 1991). Early and middle French immersion programs: French language outcomes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 48, 11-40.
24.
Lapkin, S. & Swain, M. ( 2000). Task outcomes: A focus on immersion students’ use of pronominal verbs in their writing. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 7-22.
25.
Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. ( 2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal , 86, 485-507.
26.
Leeser, M. ( 2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81.
27.
Lewis, M. ( 1993). The lexical approach. Hove/ London: Language Teaching Publications.
28.
Lightbown, P. ( 1998). The importance of timing on focus on form. In J. Williams (Ed.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Long, M. (Ed.) (2006). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
30.
Moon, R. ( 1997). Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. In M. McCarthy (Ed.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 40-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Nabei, T. ( 1996). Dictogloss: Is it an effective language learning task ? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 12, 59-74.
32.
Nassaji, H. & Cumming, A. ( 2000). What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research, 4, 95-121.
33.
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. ( 2007). Current issues in form-focused instruction. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 7-15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. ( 2000). Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random vs. negotiated help on the learning of English articles . Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
35.
Paribakht, S. & Wesche, M. ( 1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal , 11, 9-29.
36.
Paribakht, S. & Wesche, M. ( 1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review , 52, 155-78.
37.
Pica, T. ( 2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. Modern Language Journal, 89, 339-59.
38.
Pica, T. ( 2007). Time, teachers, and task in focus on form instruction . In H. Nassaji (Ed.), Form focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 161-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Pica, T., Kang, H., & Sauro, S. ( 2006). Information gap tasks: Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 301-38.
40.
Read, J. & Chapelle, C. ( 2001). A framework for second language assessment. Language Testing, 18, 1-32.
41.
Samuda, V. & Bygate, M. ( 2008). Tasks in second language learning. London: Palgrave.
42.
Side, R. ( 1990). Phrasal verbs: Sorting them out. ELT Journal, 44, 144-52.
43.
Storch, N. ( 1997). The editing talk of adult ESL learners. Language Awareness, 6, 221-32.
44.
Storch, N. ( 1998). A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52, 291-300.
45.
Storch, N. ( 2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-73.
46.
Storch, N. ( 2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 2, 143-59.
47.
Swain, M. ( 1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-64.
48.
Swain, M. ( 1995). Three functions of output in second language learning . In B. Seidlhofer (Ed.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125- 44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Swain, M. ( 1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Swain, M. ( 2001a). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 275-302.
51.
Swain, M. ( 2001b). Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 44-63.
52.
Swain, M. ( 2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow: Pearson Education.
54.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
55.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 2007a). The distributed nature of second language learning: Neil’s perspective. In H. Nassaji (Ed.), Form focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 73-86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 2007b). ‘Oh, I get it now!’ From production to comprehension in second language learning. In D.M. Brinton & O. Kagan (Eds.), Heritage language acquisition: A new field emerging (pp. 301-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-85.
58.
Tocalli-Beller, A. ( 2003). Cognitive conflict, disagreement and repetition in collaborative groups: Affective and social dimensions from an insider’s perspective . Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 143-71.
59.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.) (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
62.
Wajnryb, R. ( 1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
Williams, J. ( 2005). Form-focused instruction. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 673-91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64.
Yuan, F.Y. & Ellis, R. ( 2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27.
