Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper first presents and then discusses the attitudes towards and perceptions of education officers regarding introducing a school-based continuous assessment of speaking in the Botswana General Certificate of Secondary Education (BGCSE) ESL examinations as provided for in the BGCSE English syllabus in Botswana. Three categories of education officers that are responsible for developing and evaluating syllabuses, teaching supervision (quality assurance), and assessment of the BGCSE ESL curriculum in senior secondary schools in Botswana were interviewed, using an interview guide. The findings indicate that there are two opposing views held by the various categories of education officers regarding the importance of speaking in English in the Botswana linguistic situation. While on the one hand Curriculum Development and Evaluation (CD & E) officers and Senior Education Officers (SEOs) generally regard English speaking in the Botswana linguistic situation to be just as important as reading or writing, Examinations, Research and Testing Division (ERTD) officers did not think that speaking in English was that important.

Keywords

assessment reform communicative language teaching curriculum reform language proficiency sociolinguistics washback theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akiyama, T. (2004). Introducing EFL speaking tests into Japanese senior high school entrance examination. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Alderson, C.J. , & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics , 14, 115-129.

Bagwasi, M.M. (2003). The functional distribution of Setstwana and English in Botswana. Language, culture and curriculum, 16(2), 212-217.

Crafter, G. , Crook, P. , & Reid, A. (2006). Success for all: Ministrial Review of Senior Secondary Education in South Australia. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.

Davies, A. (1990). Principles of language testing. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kellaghan, T. , & Greaney, V. (1992). Using examination to improve education: A study of fourteen African countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Kachru, B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

La Pelle, N. (2004). Simplifying qualitative data analysis using general purpose software tools. Fields Methods, 16, 85-108.

McNamara, T.F. , & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Oxford: Blackwell.

10.

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(4), 241-257.

11.

Mgadla, P.T. (1986). Missionary and colonial education among the Bangwato: 1862-1948. Unpublished PhD thesis, Boston University, Boston, MA.

12.

Ministry of Education. (2000). Botswana General Certificate of Secondary Education (BGCSE) Teaching Syllabus . Gaborone: Ministry of Education .

13.

Moss, P.A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5-12.

14.

Moss, P.A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from Interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 20-28.

15.

Nkosana, L.B.M. (2006). The impact of curriculum reform and assessment on teaching: The case of the BGCSE English curriculum in Botswana. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, University of Melbourne, Australia.

16.

Pakir, A. (1999). Connecting with English in the context of internalisation . TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 103-114.

17.

Parson, J. (1984). Botswana: Liberal democracy and labour reserve in Southern Africa. Gower: Western Press.

18.

Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.

19.

Pitman, J.A. , O'Brien, J.E. , & McCollow, J.E. (1999). High-quality assessment: We are what we believe and do. Paper presented at the International-Association-for-Educational-Assessment (IAEA) Conference , Bled-Slovenia.

20.

Qi, L. (2004). Has a high-stakes test produced the intended changes? In L. Cheng , Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 171-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22(2), 123-141.

22.

Ryan, G.W. (2004). Using a word processor to tag and retrieve blocks of texts. Field Methods, 16(1), 109-130.

23.

Sadler, D.R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory . Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.

24.

Shohamy, E. , Donitsa-Schmidt, S. , & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time . Language Testing, 13, 298-317.

25.

Shohamy, E. , Reves, T. , & Bejarano, Y. (1986). Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency . ELT Journal, 40(3).

26.

Steffy, B.E. , & English, F.W. (1997). Curriculum and assessment for world-class schools . Lancaster, PA: TECHNOMIC Publication .

27.

Wall, D. (1996). Introducing new tests into traditional systems: Insights from general education and from innovation theory. Language Testing, 13, 334-354.

28.

Wall, D. (1999). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching: A case study in using insights from testing and innovation theory. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

29.

Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System , 28, 499-509.

30.

Wall, D. , & Alderson, J.C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10, 41-70.

31.

Weir, C. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

32.

Wilmut, J. , Wood, R. , & Murphy, R. (1996). A review of research into the reliability of examinations. Discussion paper prepared for the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

33.

Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Attitudinal obstacles to curriculum and assessment reform

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References