The developing understandings of teacher-trainees of language and content connections in `subject' teaching in Singapore's bilingual primary schools are explored in this article. I narrate the development of the project, the trainee responses, and my own reflections on the process. Throughout, I take an Exploratory Practice (Allwright, 2003) stance by attempting to understand teacher-trainee understanding, to adopt a more collegial attitude in the teacher-trainer/teacher-trainee relationship, and to integrate appropriate research methods with relevant teacher training activities.
Allwright, D. (1984). Why don't learners learn what teachers teach? The interaction hypothesis. In D. M. Singleton and D. Little (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts (pp. 3—18). Dublin: Irish Association for Applied Linguistics.
2.
Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory Practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research , 7(2), 113—141.
3.
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of Exploratory Practice. The Modern Language Journal , 89, 343—366.
4.
Aman, N. & Bokhorst-Heng, W.D. (2006, April). Singapore's multilingual hothouse: Multilingualism and the challenges for pedagogy and practice. Keynote presentation at the International Baccalaureate Organisation conference, Singapore.
5.
Brinton, D. & Master, P. (Eds.), (1997). New ways in content-based instruction. Alexandria, VA: TESOL .
6.
Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (1993). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. In M. Cochran-Smith and S. Lytle (Eds.), Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge (pp. 5—22). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Curriculum Planning and Development Division. ( 2001). English language syllabus 2001 for primary and secondary schools. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
8.
Dale, T.C. & Cuevas, G. (1992). Integrating mathematics and language learning . In P. Richard-Amato and M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 330—348). White Plains, NY: Longman.
9.
Durkin, K. (1991). Language in mathematical education: An introduction . In K. Durkin and B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education: Research and practice (pp. 3—16). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
10.
Freeman, D. (1996). Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. In K. Bailey and D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 88—115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Gianelli, M. (1997). Thematic units: Creating an environment for learning . In M. A. Snow and D. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 142—148). White Plains, NY: Longman.
12.
Goh, C.T. (2004, March). Speech at the Chinese High School's 85th Anniversary and Hwa Chong Junior College's 30th Anniversary Dinner. Retrieved 26 April 2004, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/speeches/2004/sp20040321.htm
13.
Gupta, A. (1994). The step-tongue: Children's English in Singapore . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters .
14.
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 241—272.
15.
Jing, H. (2006). Learner resistance in metacognition training? An exploration of mismatches between learner and teacher agendas. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 95—117.
16.
Kuschnir, A. & Machado, B. (2003). Puzzling, and puzzling about puzzle development . Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 163—180.
17.
Li, N. (2006). Researching and experiencing motivation: A plea for `balanced research'. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 437—456.
18.
Li W., Saravanan, V., & Ng, H.L. (1997). Language shift in the Teochew community in Singapore: A family domain analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(5), 364—384.
19.
Murphy, J. & Byrd, P. (2001). Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on English language teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20.
Murphy, J. & Stoller, F. (August, 2001). Sustained-content language teaching: An emerging definition. TESOL Journal, 10(2/3), 3—5.
21.
Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction . TESOL Quarterly, 29, 133—157.
22.
Pappas, C., Kiefer, B., & Levstik, L. (1990). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school. White Plains, NY: Longman .
23.
Pica, T. (2000, March). The content-based L2 Curriculum: Does it provide an optimal or optional approach to second language learning?Paper presented at Regional English Language Centre Seminar, Singapore.
24.
Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners?Modern Language Journal, 86: 1—19.
25.
Pica, T., Washburn, G., Evans, B., & Jo, V. (1998, March). Negative feedback in the second language content based classroom: How does it contribute to second language learning?Paper presented at PacSLRF Conference, Tokyo.
26.
Richard-Amato, P. & Snow, M. A. (Eds.), (1992). The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers. White Plains, NY: Longman.
27.
Seda, M.M., Liguori, O.Z., & Seda, C.M. (1999). Bridging literacy & social studies: Engaging prior knowledge through children's books. TESOL Journal, 8(3): 34—40.
28.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2000). Singapore census of population, 2000 — advance data release No. 3: Literacy and language. Released 1 December 2000. Retrieved 10 August 2001 from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/C2000/census.html
29.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2005). General Household Survey, Release 1 — Education and Language . Released 14 June 2006. Retrieved 6 October 2006 from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/keystats/annual/ghs/r1/chap2.pdf
30.
Snow, M. A. & Brinton, D. (Eds.), (1997). The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
31.
Spack, R.1988. Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go?TESOL Quarterly, 22, 29—51.
32.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235—253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
33.
Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition and the classroom (pp. 91—103). Lexington, MA: Heath.
34.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning . In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125—144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Vardell, S. (1995). Decisions about curriculum in a literature-based program. In M. Sorensen and B. Lehmen (Eds.), Teaching with children's books: Paths to literature-based instruction (pp. 129—136). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English .
