This case study analyses the impact of intermediate mock exams in a first-year statistics course on the social inequalities observed in tertiary education. Through descriptive analysis and regression models of a sample of 478 students, we examine how these exams influence subsequent educational decisions. Our hypothesis states that students without a university-educated parent are more likely to attribute failure to innate ability, impacting their participation in subsequent exams. Findings reveal a decline in participation rates over the semester, with disparities between students with and without university-educated parents, the latter demonstrating higher participation and pass rates. Students without a university-educated parent are more influenced by negative results in subsequent participation decisions compared to their peers with a university-educated parent.
AtkinsonW (2023) Class. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
BernardiFCebolla-BoadoH (2014) Previous school results and social background: Compensation and imperfect information in educational transitions. European Sociological Review30(2): 207–217.
3.
BreenRGoldthorpeJH (1997) Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/104346397009003002
4.
BoudonR (1974) Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. John Wiley.
5.
BourdieuPPasseronJC (1977) Reproduction in Education. Society and Culture. London: SAGE Publications.
6.
BukodiEGoldthorpeJH (2013) Decomposing ‘social origins’: The effects of parents’ class, status, and education on the educational attainment of their children. European Sociological Review29(5): 1024–1039.
7.
CincinnatoSEngelsNConsuegraE (2020) Effort and ability attributions as explanation for differences in study choice after failure: Evidence from a hypothetical vignette study among first-entry bachelor students in a Belgian university. European Journal of Psychology of Education35(4): 931–953.
8.
CondronDJBeckerJHBzhetajL (2018) Sources of students’ anxiety in a multidisciplinary social statistics course. Teaching Sociology46(4): 346–355.
9.
ContiniDCugnataFScagniA (2018) Social selection in higher education. enrolment, dropout and timely degree attainment in Italy. Higher Education75(5): 785–808.
10.
DrägerJRöhlkeLDippelA (2014) Social stratification in secondary school success after ambitious track choices. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility80: 100710.
11.
FonteyneLde FruytFDewulfN, et al. (2015) Basic mathematics test predicts statistics achievement & overall first year academic success. European Journal of Psychology of Education30(1): 95–118.
12.
HerbautE (2021) Overcoming failure in higher education: Social inequalities & compensatory advantage in dropout patterns. Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom)64(4): 383–402.
KarlsonK (2015) Expectations on track? High school tracking & adolescent educational expectations. Social Forces94(1): 115–141.
15.
KarlsonK (2019) Expectation formation for all? Group differences in student response to signals about academic performance. Sociological Quarterly60(4): 716–737.
16.
KorolkiewiczMFewster-YoungNMarmolejo-RamosF, et al. (2024) Fear of the unknown: Relationship between statistics anxiety and attitudes toward statistics of university students in three countries. Teaching Statistics. Epub ahead of print 5August. DOI: 10.1111/test.12381.
17.
LaurijssenIGlorieuxI (2020) Verdiepende Analyse van de Rol van Onderwijsprestaties En Achtergrondkenmerken Voor Keuzeverschillen in de Overgang van de Tweede Naar de Derde Graad. Gent: Steunpunt Onderwijsonderzoek.
18.
MeravigliaCBuisML (2015) Class, status and education: The influence of parental resources on IEO in Europe, 1893-1987. International Review of Social Research5(1): 35–60.
19.
MizeTD (2019) Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science6: 81–117.
20.
OakesJ (1985) Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
OECD, Education at a Glance (2019) OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
22.
SchelfhoutSWilleBFonteyneL, et al. (2019) The effects of vocational interest on study results: Student person – environment fit & program interest diversity. PLoS One14(4): 1–26.
23.
SpieglerTBednarekA (2013) First-generation students: What we ask, what we know and what it means: An international review of the state of research. International Studies in Sociology of Education23(4): 318–337.
24.
Van de WerfhorstHGHofstedeS (2007) Cultural capital or relative risk aversion? Two mechanisms for educational inequality compared. The British journal of sociology, 58(3), 391–415.
25.
WeinerB (2010) The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist45: 28–36.
