The marginalisation of transgender individuals in Kashmir is a complex and deeply ingrained problem characterised by various obstacles, including bias, intimidation, and domestic violence. In the Muslim-majority region of Kashmir, the marginalisation experienced by transgender individuals can be attributed to their perceived status as ‘other’ or a deviation from established social norms, resulting in their exclusion from the dominant societal framework. This paper will explore the socio-cultural and economic marginalisation experienced by the transgender community in Kashmir and critically examine the various policies/acts by the state and central government vis-à-vis transgender people Based on the narratives from members of the transgender community during the fieldwork, the paper also aims to unveil the various forms of discrimination and violence experienced by the members of the transgender community in Kashmir in private and public spaces. Finally, this paper will also shed light on the ‘rights’ of transgender people within the framework of Islam.
BhattacharyaSGhoshDPurkayasthaB (2022) ‘Transgender persons (protection of rights) act’ of India: An analysis of substantive access to rights of a transgender community. Journal of Human Rights Practice14(2): 676–697.
8.
BundAA (2017) Hijras of Kashmir: A Marginalized Form of Personhood. Srinagar, India: Jay Kay Books.
9.
BurdgeBJ (2007) Bending gender, ending gender: Theoretical foundations for social work practice with the transgender community. Social Work52(3): 243–250.
10.
ChakrapaniVNewmanPAShunmugamM, et al. (2017) Syndemics of depression, alcohol use, and victimisation, and their association with HIV-related sexual risk among men who have sex with men and transgender women in India. Global Public Health12(2): 250–265.
11.
ChatterjeeI (2000) A slave’s quest for selfhood in eighteenth-century Hindustan. The Indian Economic & Social History Review37(1): 53–86.
12.
CrenshawKW (2017) On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. New York: The New Press.
13.
DeyS (2013) Being a ‘kothi’: An ethnographic interrogation with a male transgender in Kolkata, India. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science11(6): 51–62.
14.
GarciaJVargasNClarkJL, et al. (2019) Social isolation and connectedness as determinants of well-being: Global evidence mapping focused on LGBTQ youth. Global Public Health15(4): 1–23.
15.
GildenA (2008) Toward a more transformative approach: The limits of transgender formal equality. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice23: 83–144.
16.
HamblyG (1974) A note on the trade in eunuchs in Mughal Bengal. Journal of the American Oriental Society94(1): 123–130.
17.
HinchyJ (2014) Obscenity, moral contagion and masculinity: Hijras in public space in colonial North India. Asian Studies Review38(2): 274–294.
NarrainS (2009) Crystallising queer politics–the Naz Foundation Case and its implications for India’s transgender communities. NUJS Law Review2: 455–470.
28.
NeumanWL (1997) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, p. 31.
29.
PrasadBD (2008) Content analysis. Research Methods for Social Work5: 1–20.
30.
PrestonLW (1987) A right to exist: Eunuchs and the state in nineteenth-century India. Modern Asian Studies21(2): 371–387.
SahastrabuddheSGuptaAStuartE, et al. (2012) Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors among transgender persons (Hijras) of Pune, India. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes59(1): 72–78.
van der ToornJPliskinRMorgenrothT (2020) Not quite over the rainbow: The unrelenting and insidious nature of heteronormative ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences34(34): 160–165.
38.
WilkinsonS (1998) Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum21(1): 111–125.
