This article examines dead celebrities’ posthumous careers and considers how gendered inequalities around possession, value, and bodily capital are produced and consumed even after death. The concept of capital plays a significant role in studies of culture, usually in relation to individual possession and personal, social, and material advantage. ‘Bodily capital’ sheds particular light upon the different ways bodies can possess value and how the generation of value is unequally distributed for men and women. Through an analysis of the Forbes Magazine Top Dead Earning Celebrities List (2001–2018), the inequality of value between men and women generated from bodily capital is examined. This article extends the intellectual agenda of sociological research on gendered inequality in bodily capital through dead celebrity posthumous careers. It reveals how, why, and when value is generated unequally with celebrity women’s bodily capital becoming a symbolic resource for others to generate profit. Furthermore, it speculates upon the prospect of a revolution in the ownership and value of gendered bodily capital among dead celebrities and predicts a future shift for women’s bodily capital and value after death.
BakerWEFaulknerRR (1991) Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology97(2): 279–309.
4.
BerkersPVerboordMWeijF (2016) ‘These critics (still) don’t write enough about women artists’: Gender inequality in the newspaper coverage of arts and culture in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States, 1955– 2005. Gender & Society30(3): 515–539.
5.
BielbyDDBielbyWT (1996) Women and men in film: Gender inequality among writers in a culture industry. Gender and Society10(3): 248–270.
6.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research of the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.
7.
Butler BreeseE (2010) Meaning, celebrity, and the underage pregnancy of Jamie Lynn Spears. Cultural Sociology4(3): 337–355.
8.
ButlerJ (2002) Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
9.
ConnellRW (2013) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. London: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
ConwayH (2016) The Law and the Dead. London: Routledge.
11.
D’RozarioD (2016) Dead celebrity (Deleb) use in marketing: An initial theoretical exposition. Psychology and Marketing33(7): 486–504.
12.
DyerR (1987) Heavenly Bodies. London: Routledge.
13.
EatonO (2019) Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis: A celebrity afterlife in American culture. Journal of American Studies53(2): 1–16.
14.
ElamAB (2014) Gender and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
15.
ElliottA (2011) ‘I want to look like that!’: Cosmetic surgery and celebrity culture. Cultural Sociology5(4): 463–477.
16.
FerrisKO (2004) Seeing and being seen: The moral order of celebrity sightings. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33(3): 236–264.
17.
FoltynJL (2008) The corpse in contemporary culture: Identifying, transacting, and recoding the dead body in the twenty-first century. Mortality13(2): 99–104.
GaveyN (2012) Beyond ‘empowerment’? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles66(11–12): 718–724.
21.
GortonKGarde-HansenJ (2013) From old media whore to new media troll: The online negotiation of Madonna’s ageing body. Feminist Media Studies13(2): 288–302.
22.
GottschallJ (2008) Literature, Science, and a New Humanities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
Gouma-PetersonTMathewsP (1987) The feminist critique of art history. The Art Bulletin69(3): 326–357.
24.
GroszE (1994) Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
25.
HakimC (2010) Erotic capital. European Sociological Review26(5): 499–518.
HeinichN (1996) The Glory of Van Gogh: An Anthropology of Admiration (trans. BrowneP). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
HollaSKuipersG (2015) Aesthetic capital. In: HanquinetLSavageM (eds) International Handbook for the Sociology of Art and Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 290–304.
29.
HurtadoA (1989) Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society14(4): 833–855.
30.
JacksonS (1995) Gender and heterosexuality: A materialist feminist analysis. In: MaynardMPurvisJ (eds) (Hetero)Sexual Politics. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 11–26.
31.
JonesSJensenJ (eds) (2005) Afterlife as Afterimage: Understanding Posthumous Fame, vol. 2. New York: Peter Lang.
32.
JonssonA (2015) Post-mortem social death – Exploring the absence of the deceased. Contemporary Social Science10(3): 284–295.
33.
KearlMC (2010) The proliferation of postselves in American civic and popular cultures. Mortality15(1): 47–63.
34.
KitchCHumeJ (2008) Journalism in a Culture of Grief. London: Routledge.
35.
LeaverT (2013) The social media contradiction: Data mining and digital death. M/C Journal: A Journal of Media and Culture16(2): 1–8.
36.
LingelJ (2013) The digital remains: Social media and practices of online grief. The Information Society29(3): 190–195.
37.
McCormickL (2015) The agency of dead musicians. Contemporary Social Science10(3): 323–335.
38.
MaguireJMatthewsJ (2012) Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies15(5): 551–562.
39.
MearsAFinlayW (2005) Not just a paper doll: How models manage bodily capital and why they perform emotional labour. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography34(3): 317–343.
40.
MeyersE (2009) ‘Can you handle my truth?’: Authenticity and the celebrity star image. The Journal of Popular Culture42(5): 890–907.
41.
OatesJC (1987) On Boxing. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
42.
Penfold-MounceR (2018) Death, the Dead and Popular Culture. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
43.
PettyRDD’RozarioD (2009) The use of dead celebrities in advertising and marketing: Balancing interests in the right of publicity. Journal of Advertising38(4): 37–49.
44.
ReayD (2004) Gendering Bourdieu’s concepts of capitals? Emotional capital, women and social class. The Sociological Review52(2): 57–74.
45.
ReayD (2006) The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British Journal of Educational Studies54(3): 288–307.
SchweitzerM (2005) The mad search for beauty: Actresses’ testimonials, the cosmetics industry, and the ‘democratization of beauty’. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era4(3): 255–292.
49.
ShillingC (2017) Body pedagogics: Embodiment, cognition and cultural transmission. Sociology51(6): 1205–1221.
50.
ShillingC (2018) Embodying culture: Body pedagogics, situated encounters and empirical research. The Sociological Review66(1): 75–90.
51.
ShugartHA (2008) Sumptuous texts: Consuming ‘otherness’ in the food film genre. Critical Studies in Media Communication25(1): 68–90.
52.
SkeggsB (2011) Imagining personhood differently: Person value and autonomist working-class value practices. The Sociological Review59(3): 496–513.
53.
StasiaCL (2004) ‘Wham! Bam! Thank You Ma’am!’: The new public/private female action hero. In: GillisSHowieGMunfordR (eds) Third Wave Feminism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–184.
54.
StephensDLHillRPHansonC (1994) The beauty myth and female consumers: The controversial role of advertising. Journal of Consumer Affairs28(1): 137–153.
