Restricted accessBook reviewFirst published online 2015-8
Book Review: The Morphogenic Paradigm: Essay Review of 'Late Modernity: Trajectories towards Morphogenic Society' (2014) and 'Social Morphogenesis' (2013)
ARCHERM.S.1988. Culture and Agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
ARCHERM.S.2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ARCHERM.S.2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ARCHERM.S.2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ARCHERM.S.2013. “Social Morphogenesis and the Prospects of Morphogenic Society.”In Social Morphogenesis, p. 1–22. Springer
6.
ARCHERMargaret S.2014. “Introduction: ‘Stability’ or ‘Stabilization’ – On Which Would Morphogenic Society Depend?.” In Late Modernity, Archer, M.S.,(Ed). 1–20. Social Morphogenesis. Springer.
7.
CAETANOA. (2015), “Defining personal reflexivity: a critical reading of Archer's approach.” European Journal of Social Theory. 18(1): p. 60–75.
8.
DONATIP.2010. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. Routledge.
9.
DONATIP.2014. “Relational Sociology, Critical Realism and Social Morphogenesis.” Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, no. 1 (July): p. 9–26.
10.
PORPORADouglas V.2013. “Morphogenesis and Social Change.” In Social Morphogenesis, In Archer, M.S. (Ed.) p. 25–37. Netherlands: Springer.
