ShaferR., & SchapiroJ.Interpreting genotypic resistance tests. Published on HIVresistanceWeb: March 4, 2002.
2.
ShaferR.W., GonzalesM.J., & Brun-VezinetF.Online comparison of HV-1 drug resistance algorithms identifies rates and causes of discordant interpretations. Antiviral Therapy2001; 6(Suppl. 1): 134.
3.
LanierE.R., ScottJ., Ait-KhaledM., StoneC., MelbyT., SturgeG., St ClaiM.H., SteelH., HetheringtonS., PearceG., SpreenW., & LafonS.Predicting abacavir antiviral activity using HIV-1 reverse transcriptase genotype: a comparison of 12 algorithms. Antiviral Therapy2001; 6(Suppl. 1): 137.
4.
BeerewinkelN., ScmidtB., WalterH., KaiserK., LengauerlT., HoffmanD., KornK., & SelbingJ.Diversity and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance: a bioinformatics approach to predicting phenotype from genotype. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA2002; 99: 8271–8276.
5.
SchapiroJ.M.Resistance assay interpretation systems vary widely in method and approach. Antiviral Therapy2001; 6(Suppl. 1): 131.
6.
KijakG.H., RubioA.E., PampuroS.E., ZalaC., CahnP., GalliR., MontanerJ.S., & SalomonH.Discrepant results in the interpretation of HIV-1 drug-resistance genotypic data among widely used algorithms. HIV Medicine20034(1): 72–78.
7.
Puchhammer-StöcklE., SteiningerC., GeringerE., & HeinzF.X.Comparison of virtual phenotype and HIV-SEQ program (Stanford) interpretation for predicting drug resistance of HIV strains. HIV Medicine2002; 3: 200–206.